Navigating psychological barriers in agricultural innovation adoption: A multi-stakeholder perspective

被引:1
|
作者
Chindasombatcharoen, Nopparuj [1 ,2 ]
Tsolakis, Naoum [1 ,3 ]
Kumar, Mukesh [1 ]
O'Sullivan, Eoin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, 17 Charles Babbage Rd, Cambridge CB3 0FS, England
[2] Thailand Dev Res Inst, 565 Ramkamhaeng 39, Bangkok 10310, Thailand
[3] Int Hellen Univ, Dept Supply Chain Management, Thessaloniki 57001, Greece
关键词
Psychological barriers; Innovation resistance; Innovation adoption; Sustainable agriculture development; Smallholder farmers; SMALLHOLDER FARMERS; MANAGEMENT; RESISTANCE; INTENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143695
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agricultural innovation is pivotal for enabling cleaner production within the sector. Nonetheless, smallholder farmers in the Global South encounter functional and psychological challenges impeding innovation adoption efforts. Existing literature tends to narrowly focus on common barriers associated with individual innovations, often limiting the broader significance of psychological hindrances. This study takes a unique approach by delving primarily into the realm of psychological barriers, encompassing internal challenges that impede adoption, and explores external support strategies to overcome such hindrances. A multi-stakeholder approach was employed to gather validated insights based on data from eighteen semi-structured interviews involving rice farmers and agricultural technology companies. Research findings revealed that trust, effort, attitudinal, and normative barriers are prominent psychological hindrances to innovation adoption. To this effect, pertinent enabling factors and overcoming strategies should demonstrate clear benefits, infuse trust, reduce effort requirements, and develop human capital. This research is among the first to demystify and categorise psychological barriers and corresponding overcoming strategies into an integrated framework. The resulting framework allows for a novel and comprehensive analysis of the potential strategies to overcome the psychological barriers collectively, a complex issue involving interrelations and hidden dynamics that are challenging to explore otherwise. This study contributes to the Innovation Resistance Theory through its application within the context of smallholder farmers and leads to implications to expedite the transformation towards a more sustainable and innovative agriculture sector.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of policy changes on the mustard ecosystem: a multi-stakeholder perspective
    Ray, Mohit
    Kumar, Avinash
    Srivastava, Samir K.
    JOURNAL OF AGRIBUSINESS IN DEVELOPING AND EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2024, 14 (05) : 1127 - 1147
  • [42] Moral considerations on social robots in education: A multi-stakeholder perspective
    Smakman, Matthijs
    Vogt, Paul
    Konijn, Elly A.
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2021, 174
  • [43] The core of secondary level quantum education: a multi-stakeholder perspective
    Merzel, Avraham
    Bitzenbauer, Philipp
    Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, Kim
    Stadermann, Kirsten
    Andreotti, Erica
    Anttila, Daria
    Bondani, Maria
    Chiofalo, Maria Luisa
    Faletic, Sergej
    Frans, Renaat
    Goorney, Simon
    Greinert, Franziska
    Jurcic, Leon
    Koupilova, Zdenka
    Malgieri, Massimiliano
    Mueller, Rainer
    Onorato, Pasquale
    Pospiech, Gesche
    Ubben, Malte
    Woitzik, Andreas
    Pol, Henk
    EPJ QUANTUM TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [44] Framework for Evaluating and Implementing Inpatient Portals: a Multi-stakeholder Perspective
    Walker, Daniel M.
    Hefner, Jennifer L.
    Sieck, Cynthia J.
    Huerta, Timothy R.
    McAlearney, Ann Scheck
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2018, 42 (09)
  • [45] A multi-stakeholder perspective on sustainable healthcare: From 2030 onwards
    Pereno, Amina
    Eriksson, Daniel
    FUTURES, 2020, 122
  • [46] Port performance in container transport logistics: A multi-stakeholder perspective
    Ha, Min-Ho
    Yang, Zaili
    Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2019, 73 : 25 - 40
  • [47] Options for imaging cellular therapeutics in vivo: a multi-stakeholder perspective
    Helfer, Brooke M.
    Ponomarev, Vladimir
    Patrick, P. Stephen
    Blower, Philip J.
    Feitel, Alexandra
    Fruhwirth, Gilbert O.
    Jackman, Shawna
    Mouries, Lucilia Pereira
    Park, Margriet V. D. Z.
    Srinivas, Mangala
    Stuckey, Daniel J.
    Thu, Mya S.
    van den Hoorn, Tineke
    Herberts, Carla A.
    Shingleton, William D.
    CYTOTHERAPY, 2021, 23 (09) : 757 - 773
  • [48] Discursive Tensions in CSR Multi-stakeholder Dialogue: A Foucauldian Perspective
    Christiane Marie Høvring
    Sophie Esmann Andersen
    Anne Ellerup Nielsen
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 152 : 627 - 645
  • [49] Overburdening of peer reviewers: A multi-stakeholder perspective on causes and effects
    Severin, Anna
    Chataway, Joanna
    LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2021, 34 (04) : 537 - 546
  • [50] A multi-stakeholder perspective of relationship marketing in higher education institutions
    Jain, Varsha
    Mogaji, Emmanuel
    Sharma, Himani
    Babbili, Anantha S.
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, 2024, 34 (02) : 502 - 520