Navigating psychological barriers in agricultural innovation adoption: A multi-stakeholder perspective

被引:1
|
作者
Chindasombatcharoen, Nopparuj [1 ,2 ]
Tsolakis, Naoum [1 ,3 ]
Kumar, Mukesh [1 ]
O'Sullivan, Eoin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, 17 Charles Babbage Rd, Cambridge CB3 0FS, England
[2] Thailand Dev Res Inst, 565 Ramkamhaeng 39, Bangkok 10310, Thailand
[3] Int Hellen Univ, Dept Supply Chain Management, Thessaloniki 57001, Greece
关键词
Psychological barriers; Innovation resistance; Innovation adoption; Sustainable agriculture development; Smallholder farmers; SMALLHOLDER FARMERS; MANAGEMENT; RESISTANCE; INTENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143695
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agricultural innovation is pivotal for enabling cleaner production within the sector. Nonetheless, smallholder farmers in the Global South encounter functional and psychological challenges impeding innovation adoption efforts. Existing literature tends to narrowly focus on common barriers associated with individual innovations, often limiting the broader significance of psychological hindrances. This study takes a unique approach by delving primarily into the realm of psychological barriers, encompassing internal challenges that impede adoption, and explores external support strategies to overcome such hindrances. A multi-stakeholder approach was employed to gather validated insights based on data from eighteen semi-structured interviews involving rice farmers and agricultural technology companies. Research findings revealed that trust, effort, attitudinal, and normative barriers are prominent psychological hindrances to innovation adoption. To this effect, pertinent enabling factors and overcoming strategies should demonstrate clear benefits, infuse trust, reduce effort requirements, and develop human capital. This research is among the first to demystify and categorise psychological barriers and corresponding overcoming strategies into an integrated framework. The resulting framework allows for a novel and comprehensive analysis of the potential strategies to overcome the psychological barriers collectively, a complex issue involving interrelations and hidden dynamics that are challenging to explore otherwise. This study contributes to the Innovation Resistance Theory through its application within the context of smallholder farmers and leads to implications to expedite the transformation towards a more sustainable and innovative agriculture sector.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi-stakeholder Initiatives and Legitimacy: A Deliberative Systems Perspective
    Apffelstaedt, Kristin
    Schrage, Stephanie
    Gilbert, Dirk Ulrich
    BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2024, 34 (03) : 375 - 408
  • [32] Supplier Development Practices for Sustainability: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective
    Liu, Lingxuan
    Zhang, Min
    Hendry, Linda C.
    Bu, Maoliang
    Wang, Shi
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 27 (01) : 100 - 116
  • [33] Drivers and barriers to rural electrification in India - A multi-stakeholder analysis
    Palit, Debajit
    Kumar, Atul
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 166
  • [34] Social network analysis of multi-stakeholder platforms in agricultural research for development: Opportunities and constraints for innovation and scaling
    Hermans, Frans
    Sartas, Murat
    Van Schagen, Boudy
    van Asten, Piet
    Schut, Marc
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02):
  • [35] Sustainability indicators for festival tourism: A multi-stakeholder perspective
    Liu, Chyong-Ru
    Lin, Wei-Rong
    Wang, Yao-Chin
    Chen, Shan-Pei
    JOURNAL OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HOSPITALITY & TOURISM, 2019, 20 (03) : 296 - 316
  • [36] Barriers to Personalised Prevention: Perspectives from a Multi-Stakeholder Consultation
    Costa, A.
    Cardoso, M. L.
    Carvalho, A.
    Osti, T.
    Farina, S.
    Flodkvist, E.
    Gyllenberg, A.
    Boccia, S.
    Vicente, A. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 34
  • [37] A Boundary Tool for Multi-stakeholder Sustainable Business Model Innovation
    Velter M.G.E.
    Bitzer V.
    Bocken N.M.P.
    Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2022, 2 (2): : 401 - 431
  • [38] Navigating Input and Output Legitimacy in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: Institutional Stewards at Work
    Kruuse, Mikkel
    Tangbaek, Kasper Reming
    Jespersen, Kristjan
    Gallemore, Caleb
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (23)
  • [39] Breaking barriers to adoption: A multi-stakeholder platform approach to promoting improved common bean varieties among farmers in Malawi
    Rambiki, Ivy Kadakoma
    Phiri, Alexander
    Magreta, Ruth
    Birachi, Eliud
    Larochelle, Catherine
    Mutua, Mercy
    Rubyogo, Jean Claude
    Nkhata, Wilson
    OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE, 2024, 53 (01) : 30 - 36
  • [40] Discursive Tensions in CSR Multi-stakeholder Dialogue: A Foucauldian Perspective
    Hovring, Christiane Marie
    Andersen, Sophie Esmann
    Nielsen, Anne Ellerup
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 152 (03) : 627 - 645