Expressions of uncertainty in online science communication hinder information diffusion

被引:0
|
作者
Stavrova, Olga [1 ,2 ]
Kleinberg, Bennett [3 ,4 ]
Evans, Anthony M. [5 ]
Ivanovic, Milena [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lubeck, Dept Psychol, Maria Goeppert Str 9a, D-23562 Lubeck, Schleswig Holst, Germany
[2] Tilburg Univ, Dept Social Psychol, NL-5000LE Tilburg, North Brabant, Netherlands
[3] Tilburg Univ, Dept Methodol & Stat, NL-5000LE Tilburg, North Brabant, Netherlands
[4] UCL, Dept Secur & Crime Sci, London WC1E 6BT, England
[5] Allstate Corp, Claims Strateg Design, Chicago, IL 60605 USA
[6] Ipsos Strateg Mkt, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
来源
PNAS NEXUS | 2024年 / 3卷 / 10期
关键词
uncertainty; science communication; information diffusion; text analysis; social media; DECISION-MAKING; CONFIDENCE; TRUST; PSYCHOLOGY; LANGUAGE; PREDICT; SPREAD; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae439
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Despite the importance of transparent communication of uncertainty surrounding scientific findings, there are concerns that communicating uncertainty might damage the public perception and dissemination of science. Yet, a lack of empirical research on the potential impact of uncertainty communication on the diffusion of scientific findings poses challenges in assessing such claims. We studied the effect of uncertainty in a field study and a controlled experiment. In Study 1, a natural language processing analysis of over 2 million social media (Twitter/X) messages about scientific findings revealed that more uncertain messages were shared less often. Study 2 replicated this pattern using an experimental design where participants were presented with large-language-model (LLM)-generated high- and low-uncertainty messages. These results underscore the role of uncertainty in the dissemination of scientific findings and inform the ongoing debates regarding the benefits and the risks of uncertainty in science communication.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] COMMUNICATION IN LIBRARY AND INFORMATION-SCIENCE
    MEADOW, CT
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L INFORMATION, 1987, 12 (01): : 1 - 9
  • [22] Information and communication technologies in science education
    Suduc, Ana-Maria
    Bizoi, Mihai
    Gorghiu, Gabriel
    Gorghiu, Laura Monica
    3RD WORLD CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES - 2011, 2011, 15 : 1076 - 1080
  • [23] Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age
    van der Sanden, Maarten C. A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 61 (07): : 1508 - 1511
  • [24] Information Science and Communication: An Specific Field?
    Gonzalez Dominguez, Carlos
    CIENCIA ERGO-SUM, 2010, 17 (02) : 205 - 213
  • [25] Communication and public consultations online in Science and Technology
    Barbosa, Henrianne
    Dias Rigolin, Camila Carneiro
    Piumbato Innocentini Hayashi, Maria Cristina
    REDES COM-REVISTA DE ESTUDIOS PARA EL DESARROLLO SOCIAL DE LA COMUNICACION, 2013, (07): : 141 - 161
  • [26] UNDERSTANDING SCIENCE - STUDIES OF COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION
    GRIFFITH, BC
    COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1989, 16 (05) : 600 - 614
  • [27] Fundamentals of Molecular Information and Communication Science
    Akan, Ozgur B.
    Ramezani, Hamideh
    Khan, Tooba
    Abbasi, Naveed A.
    Kuscu, Murat
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2017, 105 (02) : 306 - 318
  • [28] INFORMATION-SCIENCE AS A METHOD OF COMMUNICATION
    ALLARD, M
    USE AND ABUSE OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1988, 14 : 129 - 134
  • [29] Adaptive Heuristics That (Could) Fit: Information Search and Communication Patterns in an Online Forum of Investors Under Market Uncertainty
    Casnici, Niccolo
    Castellani, Marco
    Squazzoni, Flaminio
    Testa, Manuela
    Dondio, Pierpaolo
    SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2019, 37 (06) : 734 - 749
  • [30] Uncertainty in risk analysis: Bridging science, management, and communication
    Greiner, Matthias
    Merten, Caroline
    Martino, Laura
    Boel, Gaby-Fleur
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2022, 42 (02) : 223 - 223