Bayesian joint residual moveout and amplitude-variation-with-offset inversion

被引:0
|
作者
Saadallah, Yanis [1 ,2 ]
Buland, Arild [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, Dept Energy Resources, Stavanger, Norway
[2] Equinor, Oslo, Norway
[3] Equinor, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
VELOCITY ANALYSIS; LITHOLOGY; FLUID; AVO; MIGRATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1190/GEO2023-0371.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Residual moveout (RMO) can have a severe impact on seismic amplitude-variation-with-offset (AVO) analysis. It is, therefore, common practice to quality control and correct the processed seismic data for RMO before AVO analysis. However, a complicating factor is that AVO effects and tuning may result in up- or down-dipping events that are easily mistaken for events with RMO, e.g., AVO Class 2p response. Flattening these events will lead to an incorrect AVO estimation. We present a new Bayesian joint RMO and AVO inversion to estimate the RMO time shifts and the AVO intercept and gradient. The joint inversion corrects the seismic data based on the RMO and AVO prior models rather than explicitly assuming that the data should be flattened. The prior models will typically guide toward flat gathers but will also allow for up- and down-dipping events when these are possible within the prior model. The method is illustrated on synthetic and real seismic data. For cases wherein flat events are correct, the results are similar to sequential methods with RMO correction before AVO analysis, but in situations wherein dipping seismic reflectors may be misinterpreted as events with RMO, the joint inversion provides better results by evaluating RMO and AVO simultaneously. The inversion results include the posterior covariance matrix, which represents uncertainties for the AVO intercept and gradient, the RMO time shifts, and the correlations between these at all samples. The uncertainty of the RMO time shift varies within seismic gathers and depends on the seismic quality and how clear and well determined the seismic events are. The uncertainty of the RMO is lower for clear and continuous events but increases in the zones with weaker and noisy events. The uncertainty of the RMO time shifts has a low impact on the uncertainty of the AVO intercept but increases the uncertainty of the AVO gradient significantly.
引用
收藏
页码:R329 / R337
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Bayesian inversion for effective pore-fluid bulk modulus based on fluid-matrix decoupled amplitude variation with offset approximation
    Yin, Xingyao
    Zhang, Shixin
    GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 79 (05) : R221 - R232
  • [42] OFFSET AMPLITUDE VARIATION AND CONTROLLED AMPLITUDE PROCESSING
    YU, G
    GEOPHYSICS, 1986, 51 (02) : 500 - 500
  • [43] Amplitude variation with offset and azimuth inversion to predict and evaluate coal seam fracture parameters
    Wu, Haibo
    Zhu, Shujie
    Liu, Qinjie
    Dong, Shouhua
    Huang, Yanhui
    Zhang, Pingsong
    FRONTIERS OF EARTH SCIENCE, 2023, 17 (02) : 505 - 513
  • [44] Amplitude variation with offset and azimuth inversion to predict and evaluate coal seam fracture parameters
    Haibo WU
    Shujie ZHU
    Qinjie LIU
    Shouhua DONG
    Yanhui HUANG
    Pingsong ZHANG
    Frontiers of Earth Science, 2023, 17 (02) : 505 - 513
  • [45] Nonlinear petrophysical amplitude variation with offset inversion with spatially variable pore aspect ratio
    Guo, Qiang
    Ba, Jing
    Luo, Cong
    GEOPHYSICS, 2022, 87 (04) : M111 - M125
  • [46] Amplitude variation with offset and azimuth inversion to predict and evaluate coal seam fracture parameters
    Haibo Wu
    Shujie Zhu
    Qinjie Liu
    Shouhua Dong
    Yanhui Huang
    Pingsong Zhang
    Frontiers of Earth Science, 2023, 17 : 505 - 513
  • [47] Two-step joint PP- and PS-wave three-term amplitude-variation with offset inversion
    Du, Qizhen
    Zhang, Bo
    Meng, Xianjun
    Guo, Chengfeng
    Chen, Gang
    Huo, Guodong
    INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2016, 4 (04): : T613 - T625
  • [48] A direct inverse method for subsurface properties: The conceptual and practical benefit and added value in comparison with all current indirect methods, for example, amplitude-variation-with-offset and full-waveform inversion
    Weglein, Arthur B.
    INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2017, 5 (03): : SL89 - SL107
  • [49] Source wavelet and local wave propagation effects on the amplitude-variation-with-offset response of thin-layer models: A physical modeling study
    Assis, Carlos A. M.
    Oliveira, Sergio A. M.
    Missagia, Roseane M.
    de Ceia, Marco A. R.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 82 (04) : N27 - N41
  • [50] Reservoir-oriented wave-equation-based seismic amplitude variation with offset inversion
    Gisolf, Dries
    Haffinger, Peter R.
    Doulgeris, Panos
    INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2017, 5 (03): : SL43 - SL56