Bayesian joint residual moveout and amplitude-variation-with-offset inversion

被引:0
|
作者
Saadallah, Yanis [1 ,2 ]
Buland, Arild [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, Dept Energy Resources, Stavanger, Norway
[2] Equinor, Oslo, Norway
[3] Equinor, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
VELOCITY ANALYSIS; LITHOLOGY; FLUID; AVO; MIGRATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1190/GEO2023-0371.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Residual moveout (RMO) can have a severe impact on seismic amplitude-variation-with-offset (AVO) analysis. It is, therefore, common practice to quality control and correct the processed seismic data for RMO before AVO analysis. However, a complicating factor is that AVO effects and tuning may result in up- or down-dipping events that are easily mistaken for events with RMO, e.g., AVO Class 2p response. Flattening these events will lead to an incorrect AVO estimation. We present a new Bayesian joint RMO and AVO inversion to estimate the RMO time shifts and the AVO intercept and gradient. The joint inversion corrects the seismic data based on the RMO and AVO prior models rather than explicitly assuming that the data should be flattened. The prior models will typically guide toward flat gathers but will also allow for up- and down-dipping events when these are possible within the prior model. The method is illustrated on synthetic and real seismic data. For cases wherein flat events are correct, the results are similar to sequential methods with RMO correction before AVO analysis, but in situations wherein dipping seismic reflectors may be misinterpreted as events with RMO, the joint inversion provides better results by evaluating RMO and AVO simultaneously. The inversion results include the posterior covariance matrix, which represents uncertainties for the AVO intercept and gradient, the RMO time shifts, and the correlations between these at all samples. The uncertainty of the RMO time shift varies within seismic gathers and depends on the seismic quality and how clear and well determined the seismic events are. The uncertainty of the RMO is lower for clear and continuous events but increases in the zones with weaker and noisy events. The uncertainty of the RMO time shifts has a low impact on the uncertainty of the AVO intercept but increases the uncertainty of the AVO gradient significantly.
引用
收藏
页码:R329 / R337
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Time-lapse amplitude variation with offset inversion using Bayesian theory in two-phase media
    Zhi, Longxiao
    Gu, Hanming
    GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 84 (03) : N55 - N79
  • [32] Seismic amplitude variation with offset inversion in a vertical transverse isotropy medium
    Sams, Mark
    Annamalai, Annushia
    Gallop, Jeremy
    INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2019, 7 (03): : T581 - T593
  • [33] Nonlinear inversion of seismic amplitude variation with offset for an effective stress parameter
    Chen H.
    Li J.
    Innanen K.A.
    Geophysics, 2020, 85 (04): : R299 - R311
  • [34] Constrained nonlinear amplitude variation with offset inversion using Zoeppritz equations
    Gholami, Ali
    Aghamiry, Hossein S.
    Abbasi, Mostafa
    GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 83 (03) : R245 - R255
  • [35] Nonlinear inversion of seismic amplitude variation with offset for an effective stress parameter
    Chen, Huaizhen
    Li, Junxiao
    Innanen, Kristopher A.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 85 (04) : R299 - R311
  • [36] Quantifying amplitude-variation-with-offset uncertainties related to calcite-cemented beds using a Monte Carlo simulation
    Tschache, Saskia
    Vinje, Vetle
    Lie, Jan Erik
    Iversen, Einar
    INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2023, 11 (02): : T313 - T327
  • [37] Value of information analysis and Bayesian inversion for closed skew-normal distributions: Applications to seismic amplitude variation with offset data
    Rezaie, Javad
    Eidsvik, Jo
    Mukerji, Tapan
    GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 79 (04) : R151 - R163
  • [38] Estimation and accounting for the modeling error in probabilistic linearized amplitude variation with offset inversion
    Madsen, Rasmus Bodker
    Hansen, Thomas Mejer
    GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 83 (02) : N15 - N30
  • [39] A new prestack three-parameter amplitude variation with offset inversion method
    Lu, Qi
    Song, Chao
    Liu, Cai
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 15 (04) : 1300 - 1309
  • [40] Amplitude variation with offset inversion using acoustic-elastic local solver
    Jaimes-Osorio, Ligia Elena
    Malcolm, Alison
    Gholami, Ali
    GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 85 (03) : R251 - R262