Enablers and barriers to nurse practitioners working in Australian aged care: A scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Peters, Micah D. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Marnie, Casey [1 ,2 ]
Helms, Christopher [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Rosemary Bryant AO Res Ctr, UniSA Clin & Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Australian Nursing & Midwifery Federat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth Evidence Synth Recommendat & Impact HESRI, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide Nursing Sch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Aalborg Univ, Inst Ctr Excellence, Dept Clin Med, Danish Ctr Systemat Reviews A Joanna Briggs, Aalborg, Denmark
[6] Charles Darwin Univ, Fac Hlth, Sch Nursing, Darwin, NT, Australia
关键词
Australia; Health Services for the Aged; Home care services; Nursing homes; Nurse practitioners; PRISMA-ScR; PRACTICE SETTINGS; CLINICAL-TRIAL; SERVICE; RESOURCE; OUTCOMES; PEOPLE; POLICY; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104861
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify evidence reporting on nurse practitioners working in aged care in Australia and to categorise the reported factors found to be barriers or facilitators to operation in terms of establishment, sustainability, and expansion. Introduction: Nurse practitioners work in a variety of aged care contexts throughout Australia but are underutilised and uncommon. Despite evidence for their effectiveness, it is unclear what barriers or enabling factors contribute to the successful and sustainable implementation of nurse practitioners working in this sector. Methods: Based on an a-priori protocol the JBI methodology for scoping reviews was used and the review reported against the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Databases searched included MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science, and Scopus. Peer reviewed and grey literature describing the role of Australian nurse practitioners in aged care were included. Results: Of 2968 retrieved sources, 18 were included representing studies of a variety of designs from all Australian states and territories. Residential care and in-home care contexts as well as metropolitan, regional, and remote locations were represented. Overall, 123 individual barriers and facilitators were identified across seven inductively derived categories: staff/individual, organisational, system, operational, resource, data, and consumers/clients/residents. In many cases, factors appeared across both positive (facilitators) and negative (barriers) categories. Conclusions: Nurse practitioners can improve the quality of care being provided to older people accessing aged care in Australia. When establishing or maintaining nurse practitioner roles in aged care knowledge users should have a comprehensive understanding of the range of factors potentially contributing to or limiting success or sustainability. As implementation is highly contextual, various types of organisational and sectoral factors as well as individual and overarching factors related to the regulation of nurse practitioners practice should be considered. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The enablers and barriers to children visiting their ill parent/carer in intensive care units: A scoping review
    Ewens, Beverley
    Collyer, Doreen
    Kemp, Vivien
    Arabiat, Diana
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 34 (06) : 604 - 619
  • [32] Nurse Practitioners' Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice Into Routine Care: A Scoping Review
    Clarke, Vanessa
    Lehane, Elaine
    Mulcahy, Helen
    Cotter, Patrick
    WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2021, 18 (03) : 180 - 189
  • [33] Nurse practitioners' use of diagnostic imaging: A scoping review
    Kearns, Mary
    Brennan, Patrick
    Buckley, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024, 33 (02) : 432 - 453
  • [34] What are the attitudes and perceptions of general practitioners about the role of nurse practitioners in the community care setting: A scoping review
    Summers, Anthony
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2024, 80
  • [35] Facilitators and barriers to using telepresence robots in aged care settings: A scoping review
    Hung, Lillian
    Wong, Joey
    Smith, Chelsea
    Berndt, Annette
    Gregorio, Mario
    Horne, Neil
    Jackson, Lynn
    Mann, Jim
    Wada, Mineko
    Young, Erika
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION AND ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGIES ENGINEERING, 2022, 9
  • [36] Seeking residents' views regarding Australian residential aged care: A scoping review
    Caine, Anne-Maree
    Gustafsson, Louise
    Molineux, Matthew
    Aplin, Tammy
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2024, 43 (03) : 442 - 453
  • [37] Dermatology experience of nurse practitioners working in primary care
    Ogden, S.
    Benton, E. C.
    McElhone, K.
    Owen, C. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 155 : 52 - 53
  • [38] Primary care healthcare professionals supporting patients to discontinue antidepressants: A scoping review of barriers, enablers and interventions
    Atkins, Bethany
    Maden, Michelle
    Birt, Linda
    Tromans, Samuel
    Swithenbank, Zoe
    Kersey, Olivia Rose
    Smith, Pam
    Scott, Sion
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2025, 21 (06): : 431 - 443
  • [39] Modified scoping review of the enablers and barriers to implementing primary health care in the COVID-19 context
    Edelman, Alexandra
    Marten, Robert
    Montenegro, Hernan
    Sheikh, Kabir
    Barkley, Shannon
    Ghaffar, Abdul
    Dalil, Suraya
    Topp, Stephanie M.
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2021, 36 (07) : 1163 - 1186
  • [40] Physiotherapists' perceptions, readiness, enablers, and barriers to use telerehabilitation: A scoping review
    Sia, Lee Lee
    Sharma, Shobha
    Ing, Janet Bong May
    Kumar, Saravana
    Singh, Devinder Kaur Ajit
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2024, 37 (06) : 1441 - 1454