Enablers and barriers to nurse practitioners working in Australian aged care: A scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Peters, Micah D. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Marnie, Casey [1 ,2 ]
Helms, Christopher [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Rosemary Bryant AO Res Ctr, UniSA Clin & Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Australian Nursing & Midwifery Federat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth Evidence Synth Recommendat & Impact HESRI, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide Nursing Sch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Aalborg Univ, Inst Ctr Excellence, Dept Clin Med, Danish Ctr Systemat Reviews A Joanna Briggs, Aalborg, Denmark
[6] Charles Darwin Univ, Fac Hlth, Sch Nursing, Darwin, NT, Australia
关键词
Australia; Health Services for the Aged; Home care services; Nursing homes; Nurse practitioners; PRISMA-ScR; PRACTICE SETTINGS; CLINICAL-TRIAL; SERVICE; RESOURCE; OUTCOMES; PEOPLE; POLICY; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104861
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify evidence reporting on nurse practitioners working in aged care in Australia and to categorise the reported factors found to be barriers or facilitators to operation in terms of establishment, sustainability, and expansion. Introduction: Nurse practitioners work in a variety of aged care contexts throughout Australia but are underutilised and uncommon. Despite evidence for their effectiveness, it is unclear what barriers or enabling factors contribute to the successful and sustainable implementation of nurse practitioners working in this sector. Methods: Based on an a-priori protocol the JBI methodology for scoping reviews was used and the review reported against the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Databases searched included MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science, and Scopus. Peer reviewed and grey literature describing the role of Australian nurse practitioners in aged care were included. Results: Of 2968 retrieved sources, 18 were included representing studies of a variety of designs from all Australian states and territories. Residential care and in-home care contexts as well as metropolitan, regional, and remote locations were represented. Overall, 123 individual barriers and facilitators were identified across seven inductively derived categories: staff/individual, organisational, system, operational, resource, data, and consumers/clients/residents. In many cases, factors appeared across both positive (facilitators) and negative (barriers) categories. Conclusions: Nurse practitioners can improve the quality of care being provided to older people accessing aged care in Australia. When establishing or maintaining nurse practitioner roles in aged care knowledge users should have a comprehensive understanding of the range of factors potentially contributing to or limiting success or sustainability. As implementation is highly contextual, various types of organisational and sectoral factors as well as individual and overarching factors related to the regulation of nurse practitioners practice should be considered. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enablers and Barriers in the Physical Environment of Care for Older People in Ordinary Housing: A Scoping Review
    Pettersson, Cecilia
    Malmqvist, Inga
    Gromark, Sten
    Wijk, Helle
    JOURNAL OF AGING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 34 (03): : 332 - 350
  • [22] Indicators of job quality in the Australian aged care workforce: A scoping review
    Carnemolla, Phillippa
    Taylor, Philip
    Gringart, Eyal
    Adams, Claire
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2022, 41 (02) : E94 - E102
  • [23] Australian social work research on ageing and aged care: A scoping review
    Hughes, Mark
    Bigby, Christine
    Tilbury, Clare
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2018, 18 (04) : 431 - 450
  • [24] Barriers and enablers to structured care delivery in Australian rural primary care
    Mullan, Leanne
    Armstrong, Kylie
    Job, Jennifer
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2023, 31 (03) : 361 - 384
  • [25] International practice settings, interventions and outcomes of nurse practitioners in geriatric care: A scoping review
    Chavez, Krista S.
    Dwyer, Andrew A.
    Ramelet, Anne-Sylvie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2018, 78 : 61 - 75
  • [26] Evidence synthesis methodology for questions relating to barriers and enablers in health care: a scoping review protocol
    Lizarondo, Lucylynn
    Stern, Cindy
    Puljak, Livia
    Zhu, Zheng
    Munn, Zachary
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2020, 18 (10) : 2148 - 2156
  • [27] Competencies and scope of practice of nurse practitioners in primary health care: a scoping review protocol
    Schlunegger, Margarithe Charlotte
    Aeschlimann, Simona
    Palm, Rebecca
    Zumstein-Shaha, Maya
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (04) : 899 - 905
  • [28] Barriers and enablers to care-leavers engagement with multi-agency support: A scoping review
    Prendergast, L.
    Davies, C.
    Seddon, D.
    Hartfiel, N.
    Edwards, R. T.
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2024, 159
  • [29] How do nurse practitioners work in primary health care settings? A scoping review
    Grant, Julian
    Lines, Lauren
    Darbyshire, Philip
    Parry, Yvonne
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2017, 75 : 51 - 57
  • [30] Competencies of nurse practitioners in family practices: A scoping review
    Schlunegger, Margarithe Charlotte
    Aeschlimann, Simona
    Palm, Rebecca
    Zumstein-Shaha, Maya
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (11-12) : 2521 - 2532