In-house protocol for fully guided zygomatic implant surgery and prosthesis repositioning A technical note

被引:0
|
作者
Bertos-Quilez, Jorge [1 ]
Pindaros-Georgios, Foskolos [1 ]
Ragucci, Gian Maria [1 ]
Valls-Ontanon, Adaia [1 ,2 ]
Liaropoulou, Yolanda-Maria [1 ]
Paternostro-Betancourt, Daniel [1 ]
Hernandez-Alfaro, Federico [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Catalunya, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Josep Trueta S-N, Barcelona 08195, Spain
[2] Teknon Med Ctr, Inst Maxillofacial Surg, Barcelona, Spain
来源
关键词
implantology; prosthodontics; PROVISIONAL RESTORATIONS; BOND STRENGTH; POLYMERIZATION; ROUGHNESS; CROWN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim: The present study aims to describe an in-house protocol for fully guided zygomatic implant surgery and prosthesis repositioning. Materials and methods: Four extramaxillary zygomatic dental implants (ZIs) were placed in one patient. The preoperative phase included digital planning, through which a surgical guide was designed and created. The analysis of the accuracy of guided surgery and the guided prosthesis repositioning was carried out by superimposing the digital planning with the final postsurgical implant positioning through CbCT. The radiologic evaluation included implant angular deviation, entrance and exit deviation, platform deviation, and apex apicocoronal and mesiodistal deviation. The prosthetic evaluation was performed in three directions: buccopalatal, apicocoronal, and mesiodistal. Results: All the ZIs successfully osseointegrated after 3 months of healing, with no complications. The mean axial angular implant deviation was 0.52 +/- 0.36 degrees, and the mean implant depth deviation was 0.47 +/- 0.28 mm. The entrance and exit deviation of the implants was 0.74 +/- 0.42 mm and 0.7 +/- 0.43 mm, respectively. The virtual prosthesis was superimposed and compared with the standard tessellation language file of the provisional polymethyl methacrylate prosthesis at the level of the first molars and central incisors; the mean buccopalatal deviation was 0.6 +/- 0.035 mm, the mean apicocoronal deviation was 0.65 +/- 0.11 mm, and the mean mesiodistal deviation was 0.3 +/- 0.07 mm. Conclusions: According to the results obtained in this first case of the present case series, careful and meticulous digital planning based on the correct pros-thetic parameters can safely guide the performance of surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:100
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Magnetic resonance imaging-guided lumbar nerve root infiltrations: optimization of an in-house protocol
    Scheffler, Max
    Guillemin, Pauline Coralie
    Lorton, Orane
    Maturana, Enrique
    Lauper, Nicolas
    Dominguez, Dennis E.
    Terraz, Sylvain
    Poletti, Pierre-Alexandre
    Salomir, Rares
    Boudabbous, Sana
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [22] Technical Accuracy of Printed Surgical Templates for Guided Implant Surgery with the coDiagnostiX™ Software
    Kuehl, Sebastian
    Payer, Michael
    Zitzmann, Nicola Ursula
    Lambrecht, Joerg Thomas
    Filippi, Andreas
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 : E177 - E182
  • [23] Cubik system: maximizing possibilities of in-house computer-guided surgery for complex craniofacial reconstruction
    Tel, A.
    Tuniz, F.
    Sembronio, S.
    Costa, F.
    Bresadola, V
    Robiony, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 50 (12) : 1554 - 1562
  • [24] Computer-Guided In-House Cranioplasty: Establishing a Novel Standard for Cranial Reconstruction and Proposal of an Updated Protocol
    Tel, Alessandro
    Tuniz, Francesco
    Fabbro, Sara
    Sembronio, Salvatore
    Costa, Fabio
    Robiony, Massimo
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 78 (12) : 2297.e1 - 2297.e16
  • [25] Vertical Mouth Opening Requirements for CAD/CAM Fully Guided Implant Surgery: An Analysis of Different Implant Systems
    Limmeechokchai, Sunee
    Goodacre, Charles
    Kan, Joseph Y. K.
    Adams, Blake
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2024, 39 (03) : e47 - e51
  • [26] Virtual implant planning and fully guided implant surgery using magnetic resonance imaging-Proof of principle
    Fluegge, Tabea
    Ludwig, Ute
    Hoevener, Jan-Bernd
    Kohal, Ralf
    Wismeijer, Daniel
    Nelson, Katja
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (06) : 575 - 583
  • [27] An open protocol for evaluating the accuracy of guided implant surgery by using digital casts
    Liu, Yushu
    Ye, Hongqiang
    Wang, Shimin
    Zhang, Lei
    Zhou, Yongsheng
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 126 (06): : 731 - 734
  • [28] Accuracy of guided dental implant surgery using a fully digital workflow: A case series
    Massuda, Carlos Kiyoshi Moreira
    de Carvalho, Marcia Rosa
    de Moraes, Joao Baptista
    Pallos, Debora
    Kim, Yeon Jung
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 132 (05): : 973 - 980
  • [29] Fully Digital Workflow for Planning Static Guided Implant Surgery: A Prospective Accuracy Study
    Lin, Chia-Cheng
    Wu, Ching-Zong
    Huang, Mao-Suan
    Huang, Chiung-Fang
    Cheng, Hsin-Chung
    Wang, Dayen Peter
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (04)
  • [30] A Prospective Study on Accuracy of Computer-Based Fully Guided Versus Pilot-Guided Implant Surgery
    Kim, Hyo Joon
    Kim, Hee Jin
    Moon, Seong Yong
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (06):