Systematic review and meta-analysis of developmental assets scales: A study protocol for psychometric properties

被引:0
|
作者
Habibi Asgarabad, Mojtaba [1 ]
Salehi Yegaei, Pardis [2 ]
Trejos-Castillo, Elizabeth [3 ,4 ]
Seyed Yaghoubi Pour, Nazanin [5 ]
Wiium, Nora [6 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Psychol, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Hlth Promot Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Tehran Inst Psychiat, Sch Behav Sci & Mental Hlth, Dept Hlth Psychol, Tehran, Iran
[4] Texas Tech Univ, Human Dev & Family Sci, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[5] Univ Tabriz, Fac Educ & Psychol, Dept Psychol, Tabriz, Iran
[6] Univ Bergen, Fac Psychol, Dept Psychosocial Sci, Bergen, Norway
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 09期
关键词
POSITIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT; COSMIN; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0309909
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background and aims Application of developmental assets, one of existing Positive Youth Development (PYD) frameworks, has gained momentum in research, policy formulations, and interventions, necessitating the introduction of the most efficient scales for this framework. The present study protocol aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of developmental assets scales to document the underlying logic, objectives, and methodologies earmarked for the identification, selection, and critical evaluation of these scales.Methods and materials In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P), the intended search will encompass databases of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, and PsycINFO, spanning from the inception of 1988 to 1st of April 2024. The review will include articles published published in English language focusing on individuals aged 10 to 29 years and reporting at least one type of reliability or validity of developmental assets scales. The review process will be in compliance with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN), and the overall quality of evidence will be determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines.Discussion This comprehensive assessment aims to identify potential biases in prior research and offer guidance to scholars regarding the optimal scales for developmental assets in terms of validity, reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability The evidence-based appraisal of the scales strengths and limitations is imperative in shaping future research, enhancing their methodological rigor, and proposing refinements to existing instruments for developmental assets.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Therapies for bruxism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (protocol)
    Mauro Elias Mesko
    Brian Hutton
    Jovito Adiel Skupien
    Rafael Sarkis-Onofre
    David Moher
    Tatiana Pereira-Cenci
    Systematic Reviews, 6
  • [42] Tuina for perimenopausal insomnia A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhi, Xiaoyu
    Zhang, Hongshi
    Liu, Yangshengjie
    Zhang, Ye
    Sun, Jiabao
    Zhao, Xuewei
    Yang, Yuesong
    Liu, Peng
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (02)
  • [43] Auricular acupuncture for migraine A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Yuqin
    Liu, Bingyang
    Gong, Weina
    Liu, Guoqiang
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (44) : E23036
  • [44] Zinc and thyroid cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
    Soares, Aline Alves
    Nagashima, Yasmin Guerreiro
    Alves, Camila Xavier
    de Medeiros, Kleyton Santos
    Lopes, Marcia Marilia Gomes Dantas
    Brandao-Neto, Jose
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (08):
  • [45] Heart failure in Nigeria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ogah, Okechukwu S.
    Kushimo, Oyewole A.
    Adebiyi, Adewole
    Onyema, Chuka T.
    Uchenna, Onubogu C.
    Adebayo, Bosede E.
    Agaja, Oyinkansola T.
    Orimolade, Olanike A.
    Durodola, Amina
    Makinde, Isa A.
    Akinyemi, Rufus O.
    Adedeji, Waheed A.
    Adekanmi, Ademola J.
    Akinyemi, Joshua O.
    Adedokun, Babatunde
    AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES, 2023, 23 (02) : 530 - 536
  • [46] Cupping for psoriasis vulgaris A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Jie
    Yu, Qianying
    Peng, Li
    Zhang, Feng
    Lin, Wenxia
    Guo, Jing
    Xiao, Min
    Chen, Mingling
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (20)
  • [47] Adverse effects of psychotherapy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Klatte, Rahel
    Strauss, Bernhard
    Fluckiger, Christoph
    Rosendahl, Jenny
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
  • [48] Therapies for bruxism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (protocol)
    Mesko, Mauro Elias
    Hutton, Brian
    Skupien, Jovito Adiel
    Sarkis-Onofre, Rafael
    Moher, David
    Pereira-Cenci, Tatiana
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [49] Acupuncture for the postcholecystectomy syndrome Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yin, Zihan
    Cheng, Ying
    Xiao, Qiwei
    Xu, Guixing
    Yang, Han
    Zhou, Jun
    Fu, Yanan
    Chen, Jiao
    Zhao, Ling
    Liang, Fanrong
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (32)
  • [50] Is there a social gradient of sarcopenia? A meta-analysis and systematic review protocol
    Green, Darci
    Duque, Gustavo
    Fredman, Nick
    Rizvi, Aoun
    Brennan-Olsen, Sharon Lee
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (01):