Systematic review and meta-analysis of developmental assets scales: A study protocol for psychometric properties

被引:0
|
作者
Habibi Asgarabad, Mojtaba [1 ]
Salehi Yegaei, Pardis [2 ]
Trejos-Castillo, Elizabeth [3 ,4 ]
Seyed Yaghoubi Pour, Nazanin [5 ]
Wiium, Nora [6 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Psychol, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Hlth Promot Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Tehran Inst Psychiat, Sch Behav Sci & Mental Hlth, Dept Hlth Psychol, Tehran, Iran
[4] Texas Tech Univ, Human Dev & Family Sci, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[5] Univ Tabriz, Fac Educ & Psychol, Dept Psychol, Tabriz, Iran
[6] Univ Bergen, Fac Psychol, Dept Psychosocial Sci, Bergen, Norway
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 09期
关键词
POSITIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT; COSMIN; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0309909
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background and aims Application of developmental assets, one of existing Positive Youth Development (PYD) frameworks, has gained momentum in research, policy formulations, and interventions, necessitating the introduction of the most efficient scales for this framework. The present study protocol aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of developmental assets scales to document the underlying logic, objectives, and methodologies earmarked for the identification, selection, and critical evaluation of these scales.Methods and materials In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P), the intended search will encompass databases of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, and PsycINFO, spanning from the inception of 1988 to 1st of April 2024. The review will include articles published published in English language focusing on individuals aged 10 to 29 years and reporting at least one type of reliability or validity of developmental assets scales. The review process will be in compliance with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN), and the overall quality of evidence will be determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines.Discussion This comprehensive assessment aims to identify potential biases in prior research and offer guidance to scholars regarding the optimal scales for developmental assets in terms of validity, reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability The evidence-based appraisal of the scales strengths and limitations is imperative in shaping future research, enhancing their methodological rigor, and proposing refinements to existing instruments for developmental assets.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Antibiotic treatment for ocular toxoplasmosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis: study protocol
    Feliciano-Alfonso, John E.
    Vargas-Villanueva, Andres
    Alejandra Marin, Maria
    Trivino, Laura
    Carvajal, Natalia
    Moreno, Manuela
    Luna, Tatiana
    Lopez de Mesa, Clara
    Munoz-Ortiz, Juliana
    de-la-Torre, Alejandra
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (1)
  • [32] Research Review: Developmental origins of depression - a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Su, Yingying
    D'Arcy, Carl
    Meng, Xiangfei
    JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 62 (09) : 1050 - 1066
  • [33] Psychometric properties of the Facial Disability Index in patients with facial palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fatih Özden
    İsmet Tümtürk
    Zübeyir Sarı
    Neurological Sciences, 2022, 43 : 4157 - 4165
  • [34] Psychometric properties of the Facial Disability Index in patients with facial palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ozden, Fatih
    Tumturk, Ismet
    Sari, Zubeyir
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 43 (07) : 4157 - 4165
  • [35] The neuroanatomy of developmental language disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ullman, Michael T.
    Clark, Gillian M.
    Pullman, Mariel Y.
    Lovelett, Jarrett T.
    Pierpont, Elizabeth I.
    Jiang, Xiong
    Turkeltaub, Peter E.
    NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2024, 8 (05) : 962 - 975
  • [36] Systematic review meta-analysis protocol preparation and registration - A narrative review
    Maurya, Indubala
    Garg, Rakesh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2025, 69 (01) : 132 - 137
  • [37] Meta-analysis of the efficacy of Er Chen Tang in the adjuvant treatment of obesity: A study protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lv, Xueyan
    Kang, Xingyu
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (23)
  • [38] A systematic review of Tuina for women with primary dysmenorrhea A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lv, Yueming
    Feng, Huichao
    Jing, Fushi
    Ren, Yonghui
    Zhuang, Qian
    Rong, Jiao
    Pan, Qi
    Li, Mengtian
    Zhang, Jing
    Jing, Fujie
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (47)
  • [39] Radiotherapy for glioblastoma in the elderly A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Puxin
    Li, Liqiang
    Qiao, Juntang
    Li, Xiang
    Zhang, Peng
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (52)
  • [40] Erchen decoction for hyperlipemia Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luo, Huan
    Xiong, Min
    Zhu, Wenyu
    Shen, Tao
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (42) : E22374