Pathologic and Short-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Prostate Cancer Patients Following Transvesical Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Benidir, Tarik [1 ]
Ferguson, Ethan L. [1 ]
Lone, Zaeem [1 ]
Soputro, Nicolas A. [1 ]
Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana [1 ]
Weight, Christopher J. [1 ]
Kaouk, Jihad [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
Robotic surgery; Single-port; Radical prostatectomy; Oncological outcomes; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; TIME; EXPERIENCE; SURVIVAL; COHORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To study the pathologic and short-term oncological and survival outcomes following Transvesical Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed on prospectively collected data on 169 patients with low and intermediate-risks prostate cancer, who either underwent Single-Port Transvesical or Multi-Port Transperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy by a single surgeon between 2015 and 2022. Preoperative clinicopathologic characteristics, as well as final histopathology outcomes, were compared. Univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to evaluate the impact of the surgical approach on biochemical recurrence-free survival within 12 months. Results: Single-Port Transvesical and Multi-Port Transperitoneal Robotic Radical Prostatectomy were completed in 85 and 84 patients, respectively. Preoperative clinicopathologic features were similar between the 2 groups. In terms of histopathology outcomes, the 2 groups had identical final Gleason Grades, T stage, as well as the rates of adverse pathological features and positive surgical margins (P P = > 0.05). Despite the lower median number of nodes in the single-port cohort of 2 (0-5) compared to 6 (4-9) in the multi-port cohort (P P = < 0.001), there remained no statistically significant difference in the rates of lymph node invasion (P P = 0.08). At a median follow-up of 12 months, there were no differences in the biochemical recurrence-free survival rates among both groups (P P = 0.38). Univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis did not consider surgical approach to be an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence (HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.13-2.23, - 2.23, P = 0.39). Conclusion: In well-selected patients, single-port transvesical robotic radical prostatectomy provided a similar short-term oncologic control as the multi-port approach with similar surgical margin status and 1-year biochemical recurrence rates. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:370e15 / 370e21
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Potential Cancer Control in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer
    Takagi, Kimiaki
    Kawase, Makoto
    Kato, Daiki
    Kawase, Kota
    Takai, Manabu
    Iinuma, Koji
    Nakane, Keita
    Hagiwara, Noriyasu
    Yamada, Toru
    Tomioka, Masayuki
    Koie, Takuya
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (04) : 2864 - 2870
  • [42] ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES OF ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN ISUP GRADE 5 PROSTATE CANCER
    Govorov, Alexander
    Kolontarev, Konstantin
    Rasner, Pavel
    Dyakov, Vladimir
    Pushkar, Dmitry
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E197 - E198
  • [43] Prostate volume and pathologic prostate cancer outcomes following radical prostatectomy
    Pierorazio, Phillip M.
    Kinnaman, Michael D.
    Wosnitzer, Matthew S.
    Benson, Mitchell C.
    McKieman, James M.
    Goluboff, Erik T.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 626 - 627
  • [44] Comparative analysis of oncologic outcomes for open vs. robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer
    Lee, Donghyun
    Choi, Seung-Kwon
    Park, Jinsung
    Shim, Myungsun
    Kim, Aram
    Lee, Sangmi
    Song, Cheryn
    Ahn, Hanjong
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 56 (08) : 572 - 579
  • [45] Changes in pathologic outcomes and operative trends with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Bernie, Aaron
    Ramasamy, Ranjith
    Ali, Adnan
    Tewari, Ashutosh K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 30 (04) : 378 - 382
  • [46] IMPACT OF PROSTATE WEIGHT ON ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY OUTCOMES
    Munver, Ravi
    Rankin, James
    Yates, Jennifer
    Jain, Samay
    Nyirenda, Themba
    Sawczuk, Ihor S.
    Shin, David
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A170 - A171
  • [47] OUTCOMES OF ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH A HISTORY OF PREVIOUS SURGERY TO THE PROSTATE
    Gavazzi, A.
    Belba, A.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 : 59 - 60
  • [48] Robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: short-term outcomes for 113 consecutive patients
    Akio Shiomi
    Yusuke Kinugasa
    Tomohiro Yamaguchi
    Hiroyuki Tomioka
    Hiroyasu Kagawa
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2014, 29 : 1105 - 1111
  • [49] Robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: short-term outcomes for 113 consecutive patients
    Shiomi, Akio
    Kinugasa, Yusuke
    Yamaguchi, Tomohiro
    Tomioka, Hiroyuki
    Kagawa, Hiroyasu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 29 (09) : 1105 - 1111
  • [50] Short-term outcomes following radical prostatectomy.
    Lu-Yao, GL
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 1998, 46 (03) : 211A - 211A