Pathologic and Short-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Prostate Cancer Patients Following Transvesical Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Benidir, Tarik [1 ]
Ferguson, Ethan L. [1 ]
Lone, Zaeem [1 ]
Soputro, Nicolas A. [1 ]
Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana [1 ]
Weight, Christopher J. [1 ]
Kaouk, Jihad [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
Robotic surgery; Single-port; Radical prostatectomy; Oncological outcomes; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; TIME; EXPERIENCE; SURVIVAL; COHORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To study the pathologic and short-term oncological and survival outcomes following Transvesical Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed on prospectively collected data on 169 patients with low and intermediate-risks prostate cancer, who either underwent Single-Port Transvesical or Multi-Port Transperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy by a single surgeon between 2015 and 2022. Preoperative clinicopathologic characteristics, as well as final histopathology outcomes, were compared. Univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to evaluate the impact of the surgical approach on biochemical recurrence-free survival within 12 months. Results: Single-Port Transvesical and Multi-Port Transperitoneal Robotic Radical Prostatectomy were completed in 85 and 84 patients, respectively. Preoperative clinicopathologic features were similar between the 2 groups. In terms of histopathology outcomes, the 2 groups had identical final Gleason Grades, T stage, as well as the rates of adverse pathological features and positive surgical margins (P P = > 0.05). Despite the lower median number of nodes in the single-port cohort of 2 (0-5) compared to 6 (4-9) in the multi-port cohort (P P = < 0.001), there remained no statistically significant difference in the rates of lymph node invasion (P P = 0.08). At a median follow-up of 12 months, there were no differences in the biochemical recurrence-free survival rates among both groups (P P = 0.38). Univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis did not consider surgical approach to be an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence (HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.13-2.23, - 2.23, P = 0.39). Conclusion: In well-selected patients, single-port transvesical robotic radical prostatectomy provided a similar short-term oncologic control as the multi-port approach with similar surgical margin status and 1-year biochemical recurrence rates. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:370e15 / 370e21
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effect of prostate weight on the outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Boylu, Ugur
    Turan, Turgay
    Basatac, Cem
    Onol, Fikret Fatih
    Gumus, Eyup
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 39 (04): : 209 - 213
  • [32] COMPARING THE 8-YEAR ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES OF OPEN AND ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR HIGH RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Sharma, Vidit
    Moschini, Marco
    Zattoni, Fabio
    Tollefson, Matthew K.
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Thompson, R. Houston
    Frank, Igor
    Gettman, Matthew T.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E892 - E892
  • [33] PROGNOSTIC FACTORS AND ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN PT3B PROSTATE CANCER
    Kim, Dae Keun
    Alatawi, Atalla
    Sheikh, Abulhasan
    Alabdulaali, Ibrahim
    Raheem, Ali Abdel
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Rha, Koon Ho
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E555 - E556
  • [34] Oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for clinical locally advanced T3a prostate cancer
    Labanaris, A. P.
    Zugor, V
    Wagner, C.
    Lange, P.
    Witt, J. H.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (01) : E356 - E356
  • [35] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy of clinical high-risk patients with prostate cancer: A controlled study of operative and short-term postoperative events
    Brennhovd, Bjorn
    Axcrona, Karol
    Fossa, Sophie D.
    Giercksky, Karl-Erik
    Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
    Dahl, Alv A.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 47 (06) : 449 - 455
  • [36] Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate glands ≥ 100 gr. surgical, oncologic and functional outcomes
    Labanaris, A.
    Witt, J. H.
    Wagner, C.
    Lange, P.
    Zugor, V
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (01) : E567 - U219
  • [37] Outcomes of Salvage Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Focal Ablation for Prostate Cancer in Comparison to Primary Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Matched Analysis
    Bhat, K. R. Seetharam
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Sandri, Marco
    Noel, Jonathan
    Reddy, Sunil
    Perera, Roshane
    Rogers, Travis
    Roof, Shannon
    Patel, Vipul R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (05): : 1192 - 1197
  • [38] Predictors of short-term and long-term incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Shao, I-Hung
    Chang, Ying-Hsu
    Hou, Chun-Ming
    Lin, Zheng-Feng
    Wu, Chun-Te
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 46 (01) : 421 - 429
  • [39] SALVAGE ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER
    Abreu, Andre Luis de Castro
    Aron, Monish
    Swann, Noah
    Samavedi, Srinivas
    Bates, Anthony
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Chopra, Sameer
    Azhar, Raed
    Wong, Kelvin
    Satkunasivam, Raj
    Metcalfe, Charles
    Thurn, Tadzia
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Desai, Mihir
    Gill, Inderbir
    Patel, Vipul
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E1054 - E1054
  • [40] Comparison of surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer
    Inkaya, Abdurrahman
    Tahra, Ahmet
    Sobay, Resul
    Kumcu, Ali
    Kucuk, Eyup Veli
    Boylu, Ugur
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 45 (06): : 410 - 417