Minimally-invasive lateral thoracic and lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with expandable interbody cages - Considerations, complications & outcomes

被引:2
|
作者
Stienen, Martin N. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fischer, Gregor [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Battig, Linda [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Veeravagu, Anand [4 ]
Martens, Benjamin [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cantonal Hosp St Gallen, Spine Ctr Eastern Switzerland, St Gallen, Switzerland
[2] Med Sch St Gallen, Rorschacher Str 95, CH-9007 St Gallen, Switzerland
[3] Cantonal Hosp St Gallen, Dept Neurosurg, St Gallen, Switzerland
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Stanford, CA USA
[5] Cantonal Hosp St Gallen, Dept Orthoped Surg, St Gallen, Switzerland
来源
BRAIN AND SPINE | 2024年 / 4卷
关键词
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Lateral thoracic interbody fusion; Expandable spacer; Complications; Sagittal parameters; Outcome; ANTERIOR COLUMN REALIGNMENT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bas.2024.102870
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Reports about lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody fusion (LLIF) using expandable interbody spacers are sparse. Research question: To report our experience with the use of expandable spacers for LLIF. Material and methods: We reviewed all consecutive LLIF patients with use of an expandable titanium interbody implant (ELSA (R) Expandable Integrated LLIF Spacer, Globus Medical Inc, PA (USA)) between September 2018 and January 2024. Results: We identified 503 patients, in which we performed LLIF at 732 levels. In 63 patients (12.5%) and 70 levels (9.6%) an expandable spacer was used. The mean age was 61.4 years, 57.1% were females. LLIF was performed between T11/12 - L4/5 in the setting of fusion procedures (mono-/bisegmental (20; 28.6%), 3-7 segments (29; 41.4%); >7 segments (21; 30.0%)), of which 21 (33.3%), 20 (31.8%) and 22 (34.9%) were for traumatic, deformity/revision and other diagnoses. Surgery included release of the anterior longitudinal ligament in 30 cases (42.9%). Intraoperative adverse events (AEs) were noted in 2 (3.2%), postoperative AEs in 27 (42.9%) at discharge, 17 (27.0%) at 3 months and 14 (22.2%) at 12 months. Segmental sagittal Cobb angle changed from 1.3 degrees (preoperative) to 13.0 degrees at discharge (p < 0.001), 12.7 degrees at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 13.3 degrees at 12 months (p < 0.001). Functional outcome was excellent/good in 43 (68.3%; 5 missing) at 3 months and in 37 (58.7%; 10 missing) at 12 months. Discussion and conclusion: The use of LLIF with an expandable spacer was safe, promoted solid fusion and enabled powerful correction of sagittal segmental Cobb angle, which was maintained during follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and midline lumbar interbody fusion in patients with spondylolisthesis
    Wang, Yang-Yi
    Chung, Yu-Hsuan
    Huang, Chun-Hsien
    Hu, Ming-Hsien
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [42] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis
    Zhang, Qing-Yi
    Tan, Jie
    Huang, Kai
    Xie, Hui-Qi
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [43] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis
    Qing-Yi Zhang
    Jie Tan
    Kai Huang
    Hui-Qi Xie
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22
  • [44] Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Clinical Adjacent Segment Pathology A Comparative Study With Conventional Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Park, Hyung-Youl
    Kim, Young-Hoon
    Ha, Kee-Yong
    Kim, Sang-Il
    Min, Hyung-Ki
    Oh, In-Soo
    Seo, Jun-Yeong
    Chang, Dong-Gune
    Park, Jong-Tae
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (10): : 2019 - E433
  • [45] Neurological complications using a novel retractor system for direct lateral minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion
    Sedra, Fady
    Lee, Robert
    Dominguez, Ignacio
    Wilson, Lester
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 31 : 81 - 87
  • [46] Commentary: Retrospective Review of Immediate Restoration of Lordosis in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison of Static and Expandable Interbody Cages
    Chou, Dean
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 18 (05) : E153 - E154
  • [47] Two-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Expandable Interbody Spacers Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Study
    Kim, Choll
    Cohen, Dan S.
    Smith, Mark D.
    Dix, Gary A.
    Luna, Ingrid Y.
    Joshua, Gita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 (04): : 518 - 526
  • [48] Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review
    Xu, David S.
    Walker, Corey T.
    Godzik, Jakub
    Turner, Jay D.
    Smith, William
    Uribe, Juan S.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (06)
  • [49] Minimally Invasive Far Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Doria, Carlo
    Balsano, Massimo
    Rampal, Virginie
    Solla, Federico
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 8 (05) : 512 - 516
  • [50] Management of aortic injury during minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Safaee, Michael M.
    Zarkowsky, Devin
    Eichler, Charles M.
    Pekmezci, Murat
    Clark, Aaron J.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 : S538 - S543