Minimally-invasive lateral thoracic and lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with expandable interbody cages - Considerations, complications & outcomes

被引:2
|
作者
Stienen, Martin N. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fischer, Gregor [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Battig, Linda [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Veeravagu, Anand [4 ]
Martens, Benjamin [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cantonal Hosp St Gallen, Spine Ctr Eastern Switzerland, St Gallen, Switzerland
[2] Med Sch St Gallen, Rorschacher Str 95, CH-9007 St Gallen, Switzerland
[3] Cantonal Hosp St Gallen, Dept Neurosurg, St Gallen, Switzerland
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Stanford, CA USA
[5] Cantonal Hosp St Gallen, Dept Orthoped Surg, St Gallen, Switzerland
来源
BRAIN AND SPINE | 2024年 / 4卷
关键词
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Lateral thoracic interbody fusion; Expandable spacer; Complications; Sagittal parameters; Outcome; ANTERIOR COLUMN REALIGNMENT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bas.2024.102870
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Reports about lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody fusion (LLIF) using expandable interbody spacers are sparse. Research question: To report our experience with the use of expandable spacers for LLIF. Material and methods: We reviewed all consecutive LLIF patients with use of an expandable titanium interbody implant (ELSA (R) Expandable Integrated LLIF Spacer, Globus Medical Inc, PA (USA)) between September 2018 and January 2024. Results: We identified 503 patients, in which we performed LLIF at 732 levels. In 63 patients (12.5%) and 70 levels (9.6%) an expandable spacer was used. The mean age was 61.4 years, 57.1% were females. LLIF was performed between T11/12 - L4/5 in the setting of fusion procedures (mono-/bisegmental (20; 28.6%), 3-7 segments (29; 41.4%); >7 segments (21; 30.0%)), of which 21 (33.3%), 20 (31.8%) and 22 (34.9%) were for traumatic, deformity/revision and other diagnoses. Surgery included release of the anterior longitudinal ligament in 30 cases (42.9%). Intraoperative adverse events (AEs) were noted in 2 (3.2%), postoperative AEs in 27 (42.9%) at discharge, 17 (27.0%) at 3 months and 14 (22.2%) at 12 months. Segmental sagittal Cobb angle changed from 1.3 degrees (preoperative) to 13.0 degrees at discharge (p < 0.001), 12.7 degrees at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 13.3 degrees at 12 months (p < 0.001). Functional outcome was excellent/good in 43 (68.3%; 5 missing) at 3 months and in 37 (58.7%; 10 missing) at 12 months. Discussion and conclusion: The use of LLIF with an expandable spacer was safe, promoted solid fusion and enabled powerful correction of sagittal segmental Cobb angle, which was maintained during follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature
    Joseph, Jacob R.
    Smith, Brandon W.
    La Marca, Frank
    Park, Paul
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2015, 39 (04)
  • [32] Minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Foley, KT
    Lefkowitz, MA
    NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (02) : 568 - 569
  • [33] Retrospective Review of Immediate Restoration of Lordosis in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison of Static and Expandable Interbody Cages
    Vaishnav, Avani S.
    Saville, Philip
    McAnany, Steven
    Kirnaz, Sertac
    Wipplinger, Christoph
    Navarro-Ramirez, Rodrigo
    Hartl, Roger
    Yang, Jingyan
    Gang, Catherine Himo
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 18 (05) : 518 - 523
  • [34] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a novel minimally invasive expandable interbody cage: patient-reported outcomes and radiographic parameters
    Woodward, Josha
    Malone, Hani
    Witiw, Christopher D.
    Kolcun, John Paul G.
    Koro, Lacin
    Keegan, Kevin C.
    Ahmad, Shahjehan
    Kerolus, Mena G.
    David, Brian T.
    Fessler, R. David
    Fessler, Richard G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 35 (02) : 170 - 176
  • [35] Comparison of Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion with Percutaneous Posterior Fixation in Lateral Position and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Koike, Yoshinao
    Kotani, Yoshihisa
    Terao, Hidemasa
    Iwasaki, Norimasa
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (01) : 97 - 106
  • [36] Combining Expandable Interbody Cage Technology With a Minimally Invasive Technique to Harvest Iliac Crest Autograft Bone to Optimize Fusion Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery
    Virk, Sohrab
    Vaishnav, Avani S.
    Sheha, Evan
    Urakawa, Hikari
    Sato, Kosuke
    Othman, Yahya
    Chaudhary, Chirag
    Lee, Ryan
    Cong, Guang-Ting
    Chaudhary, Saad
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (09): : E522 - E530
  • [37] Stand-alone minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: Multicenter clinical outcomes
    Ahmadian, Arnir
    Bach, Konrad
    Bolinger, Bryan
    Malham, Gregory M.
    Okonkwo, David O.
    Kanter, Adam S.
    Uribe, Juan S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 22 (04) : 740 - 746
  • [38] Static versus Expandable Interbody Fusion Devices: A Comparison of 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Ledesma, Jonathan Andrew
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Dees, Azra
    Thomas, Terence
    Hiranaka, Cannon Greco
    Kurd, Mark Faisal
    Radcliff, Kris E.
    Anderson, David Greg
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 17 (01)
  • [39] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Review of Techniques and Outcomes
    Karikari, Isaac O.
    Isaacs, Robert E.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (26) : S294 - S301
  • [40] Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive surgery during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion/posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Heary, Robert F.
    Kaiser, Michael G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 24 (03) : 413 - 414