Minimally-invasive lateral thoracic and lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with expandable interbody cages - Considerations, complications & outcomes

被引:2
|
作者
Stienen, Martin N. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fischer, Gregor [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Battig, Linda [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Veeravagu, Anand [4 ]
Martens, Benjamin [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cantonal Hosp St Gallen, Spine Ctr Eastern Switzerland, St Gallen, Switzerland
[2] Med Sch St Gallen, Rorschacher Str 95, CH-9007 St Gallen, Switzerland
[3] Cantonal Hosp St Gallen, Dept Neurosurg, St Gallen, Switzerland
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Stanford, CA USA
[5] Cantonal Hosp St Gallen, Dept Orthoped Surg, St Gallen, Switzerland
来源
BRAIN AND SPINE | 2024年 / 4卷
关键词
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Lateral thoracic interbody fusion; Expandable spacer; Complications; Sagittal parameters; Outcome; ANTERIOR COLUMN REALIGNMENT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bas.2024.102870
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Reports about lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody fusion (LLIF) using expandable interbody spacers are sparse. Research question: To report our experience with the use of expandable spacers for LLIF. Material and methods: We reviewed all consecutive LLIF patients with use of an expandable titanium interbody implant (ELSA (R) Expandable Integrated LLIF Spacer, Globus Medical Inc, PA (USA)) between September 2018 and January 2024. Results: We identified 503 patients, in which we performed LLIF at 732 levels. In 63 patients (12.5%) and 70 levels (9.6%) an expandable spacer was used. The mean age was 61.4 years, 57.1% were females. LLIF was performed between T11/12 - L4/5 in the setting of fusion procedures (mono-/bisegmental (20; 28.6%), 3-7 segments (29; 41.4%); >7 segments (21; 30.0%)), of which 21 (33.3%), 20 (31.8%) and 22 (34.9%) were for traumatic, deformity/revision and other diagnoses. Surgery included release of the anterior longitudinal ligament in 30 cases (42.9%). Intraoperative adverse events (AEs) were noted in 2 (3.2%), postoperative AEs in 27 (42.9%) at discharge, 17 (27.0%) at 3 months and 14 (22.2%) at 12 months. Segmental sagittal Cobb angle changed from 1.3 degrees (preoperative) to 13.0 degrees at discharge (p < 0.001), 12.7 degrees at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 13.3 degrees at 12 months (p < 0.001). Functional outcome was excellent/good in 43 (68.3%; 5 missing) at 3 months and in 37 (58.7%; 10 missing) at 12 months. Discussion and conclusion: The use of LLIF with an expandable spacer was safe, promoted solid fusion and enabled powerful correction of sagittal segmental Cobb angle, which was maintained during follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Indications, complications and outcomes of minimally-invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion with anterior column realignment vs. standard LLIF using expandable interbody spacers
    Fischer, Gregor
    Battig, Linda
    Schofl, Thomas
    Schonfeld, Ethan
    Veeravagu, Anand
    Martens, Benjamin
    Stienen, Martin N.
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11
  • [2] MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WITH EXPANDABLE CAGES
    Buckland, Aaron J.
    Proctor, Dylan J.
    JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [3] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Interbody Fusion
    Stadler, James A., III
    Dandaleh, Nader S.
    Smith, Zachary A.
    Koski, Tyler R.
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 25 (02) : 377 - +
  • [4] Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF): An Update
    Rabau, Oded
    Navarro-Ramirez, Rodrigo
    Aziz, Mina
    Teles, Alisson
    Mengxiao Ge, Susan
    Quillo-Olvera, Javier
    Ouellet, Jean
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 : 17S - 21S
  • [5] Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion—Outcomes and Complications
    Salzmann S.N.
    Shue J.
    Hughes A.P.
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2017, 10 (4) : 539 - 546
  • [6] Utilization of Dual Expandable Cages in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery
    Omosor, Emmanuel
    Edelbach, Brandon M.
    Amer, Hammad
    Hussain, Namath S.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [7] Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
    Ozgur, BM
    Yoo, K
    Rodriguez, G
    Taylor, WR
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2005, 14 (09) : 887 - 894
  • [8] Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
    Burak M. Ozgur
    Kevin Yoo
    Gerardo Rodriguez
    William R. Taylor
    European Spine Journal, 2005, 14 : 887 - 894
  • [9] LATERAL LUMBAR FUSION, A MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL APPROACH FOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION
    Caetano, S. C.
    Sousa, L. C.
    Parente, M.
    Natal, R.
    Sousa, H.
    Goncalves, J. M.
    IRF2018: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTEGRITY-RELIABILITY-FAILURE, 2018, : 1165 - 1168
  • [10] Novel Titanium Cages for Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: First Assessment of Subsidence
    Krafft, Paul R.
    Osburn, Brooks
    Vivas, Andrew C.
    Rao, Gautam
    Alikhani, Puya
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 4 (02): : 171 - 177