Exploring resource recovery from diverted organics: Life cycle assessment comparison of options for managing the organic fraction of municipal solid waste

被引:1
|
作者
Marten, Brooke M. [1 ]
Cook, Sherri M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Boulder, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Global warming; Biochar; Waste management; Compost; Anaerobic digestion; Pyrolysis; PYROLYSIS BIOCHAR SYSTEMS; ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; FOOD WASTE; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; ENERGY; CARBON; TECHNOLOGIES; COMPONENTS; GASIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175960
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Diversion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) from landfills is increasing. Previous life cycle assessment studies have evaluated subsets of OFMSW management options, but conclusions are inconsistent, and none have evaluated diverse applications of material by-products. The primary objective of this work was to identify sustainability-based improvements to the selection, design, implementation, and operation of organics waste diversion management technologies. Process modeling and life cycle assessment were used to compare OFMSW composting, anaerobic digestion, and pyrolysis, with biochar used as a landfill cover, leachate treatment sorbent, and land applicant. Material and energy flows, calculated by newly developed models for the defined functional unit (1 kg MSW over a 20-year timeframe), were translated to environmental performance using ecoinvent and USLCI databases and TRACI method. Additionally, uncertainty, sensitivity, and scenario analyses were conducted to evaluate the implications of model uncertainties, design decisions, and resource recovery tradeoffs. OFMSW pyrolysis usually (65 % of uncertainty assessment simulations) had the best global warming performance mostly due to energy recovery and biochar's carbon sequestration benefit, which was independent of fate. Pyrolyzing the biosolids from OFMSW anaerobic digestion recovered the most energy and had the best performance in 34 % of uncertainty simulations. Material recovery amounts were large (e.g., more biochar was produced than required for novel uses) and warrant feasibility considerations. Global warming performance was more sensitive to uncertainty in carbon sequestration and primary energy production than in fertilizer offset, energy conversion, or heat offset approach. Practical implications include the potential for biochar supply to outweigh demand, and inconsistent revenue from the sale of recovered energy and carbon credits; future research could focus on evaluating the relative social and economic sustainability of the OFMSW management technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life cycle assessment of reusing fly ash from municipal solid waste incineration
    Huang, T. Y.
    Chuieh, P. T.
    DEFINING THE FUTURE OF SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE IN DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 118 : 984 - 991
  • [42] Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste treatment to energy options: Case study of KARTAMANTUL region, Yogyakarta
    Gunamantha, Made
    Sarto
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2012, 41 : 277 - 284
  • [43] Application of life cycle assessment for municipal solid waste management options in Hohhot, People's Republic of China
    Liu, Meichun
    Tan, Zhengze
    Fan, Xuechun
    Chang, Yuzhi
    Wang, Liping
    Yin, Xuefeng
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2021, 39 (01) : 63 - 72
  • [44] Substitution modelling in life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management
    Viau, S.
    Majeau-Bettez, G.
    Spreutels, L.
    Legros, R.
    Margni, M.
    Samson, R.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 102 (102) : 795 - 803
  • [45] Life cycle assessment of sanitary landfill of municipal solid waste in Nanchang
    南昌市生活垃圾卫生填埋生命周期评价
    Huang, He-Ping (hphuang2004@163.com), 2018, Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences (38):
  • [46] Evaluation of hydrothermal carbonization in urban mining for the recovery of phosphorus from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste
    Oliver-Tomas, Borja
    Hitzl, Martin
    Owsianiak, Mikolaj
    Renz, Michael
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 147 : 111 - 118
  • [47] Life cycle assessment of the French municipal solid waste incineration sector
    Beylot, Antoine
    Muller, Stephanie
    Descat, Marie
    Menard, Yannick
    Villeneuve, Jacques
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 80 : 144 - 153
  • [48] Comparison of different biological treatment scenarios for the organic fraction of municipal solid waste
    L. Lombardi
    E. A. Carnevale
    A. Corti
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2015, 12 : 1 - 14
  • [49] Comparison of different biological treatment scenarios for the organic fraction of municipal solid waste
    Lombardi, L.
    Carnevale, E. A.
    Corti, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 12 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [50] Life cycle assessment of different strategies for energy and nutrient recovery from source sorted organic fraction of household waste
    Khoshnevisan, Benyamin
    Tsapekos, Panagiotis
    Alvarado-Morales, Merlin
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Tabatabaei, Meisam
    Angelidaki, Irini
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 180 : 360 - 374