Exploring resource recovery from diverted organics: Life cycle assessment comparison of options for managing the organic fraction of municipal solid waste

被引:1
|
作者
Marten, Brooke M. [1 ]
Cook, Sherri M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Boulder, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Global warming; Biochar; Waste management; Compost; Anaerobic digestion; Pyrolysis; PYROLYSIS BIOCHAR SYSTEMS; ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; FOOD WASTE; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; ENERGY; CARBON; TECHNOLOGIES; COMPONENTS; GASIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175960
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Diversion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) from landfills is increasing. Previous life cycle assessment studies have evaluated subsets of OFMSW management options, but conclusions are inconsistent, and none have evaluated diverse applications of material by-products. The primary objective of this work was to identify sustainability-based improvements to the selection, design, implementation, and operation of organics waste diversion management technologies. Process modeling and life cycle assessment were used to compare OFMSW composting, anaerobic digestion, and pyrolysis, with biochar used as a landfill cover, leachate treatment sorbent, and land applicant. Material and energy flows, calculated by newly developed models for the defined functional unit (1 kg MSW over a 20-year timeframe), were translated to environmental performance using ecoinvent and USLCI databases and TRACI method. Additionally, uncertainty, sensitivity, and scenario analyses were conducted to evaluate the implications of model uncertainties, design decisions, and resource recovery tradeoffs. OFMSW pyrolysis usually (65 % of uncertainty assessment simulations) had the best global warming performance mostly due to energy recovery and biochar's carbon sequestration benefit, which was independent of fate. Pyrolyzing the biosolids from OFMSW anaerobic digestion recovered the most energy and had the best performance in 34 % of uncertainty simulations. Material recovery amounts were large (e.g., more biochar was produced than required for novel uses) and warrant feasibility considerations. Global warming performance was more sensitive to uncertainty in carbon sequestration and primary energy production than in fertilizer offset, energy conversion, or heat offset approach. Practical implications include the potential for biochar supply to outweigh demand, and inconsistent revenue from the sale of recovered energy and carbon credits; future research could focus on evaluating the relative social and economic sustainability of the OFMSW management technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Carbon and life cycle implications of thermal recovery from the organic fractions of municipal waste
    Stephen Burnley
    Rhiannon Phillips
    Terry Coleman
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012, 17 : 1015 - 1027
  • [32] Life Cycle Assessment for Solid Waste Disposal Options in Malaysia
    Saheri, Sanaz
    Mir, Masoud Aghajani
    Basri, Noor Ezlin Ahmad
    Mahmood, Noor Zalina Binti
    Begum, Rawshan Ara
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2012, 21 (05): : 1377 - 1382
  • [33] Biogas production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste
    Demirbas, Ayhan
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2006, 28 (12) : 1127 - 1134
  • [34] ECONOMICS OF RESOURCE RECOVERY FROM MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE
    ABERT, JG
    ALTER, H
    BERNHEISEL, JF
    SCIENCE, 1974, 183 (4129) : 1052 - 1058
  • [35] Environmental impact scenarios of organic fraction municipal solid waste treatment with Black Soldier Fly larvae based on a life cycle assessment
    Ferronato N.
    Paoli R.
    Romagnoli F.
    Tettamanti G.
    Bruno D.
    Torretta V.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (12) : 17651 - 17669
  • [36] Techno-economic evaluation and life cycle assessment for sustainable alternative biorefinery concepts using the organic fraction of municipal solid waste
    Ioannidou, Sofia-Maria
    Lopez-Gomez, Jose Pablo
    Venus, Joachim
    Valera, Miguel Angel
    Essmann, Vera
    Alegria-Dallo, Irantzu
    Kookos, Ioannis K.
    Koutinas, Apostolis
    Ladakis, Dimitrios
    GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2023, 25 (11) : 4482 - 4500
  • [37] A biorefinery platform to valorize organic fraction of municipal solid waste to biofuels: An early environmental sustainability guidance based on life cycle assessment
    Ebrahimian, Farinaz
    Khoshnevisan, Benyamin
    Mohammadi, Ali
    Karimi, Keikhosro
    Birkved, Morten
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 283
  • [38] Managing municipal solid waste - Energetic and environmental comparison among different management options
    Beccali, G
    Cellura, M
    Mistretta, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2001, 6 (04): : 243 - 249
  • [39] Biogas Harvesting from Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste as a Renewable Energy Resource in Malaysia: A Review
    Khairuddin, Nuruljannah
    Abd Manaf, Latifah
    Hassan, Mohd Ali
    Halimoon, Normala
    Ab Karim, Wan Azlina Wan
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2015, 24 (04): : 1477 - 1490
  • [40] Comparison of municipal solid waste treatment technologies from a life cycle perspective in China
    Dong, Jun
    Chi, Yong
    Zou, Daoan
    Fu, Chao
    Huang, Qunxing
    Ni, Mingjiang
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2014, 32 (01) : 13 - 23