Avoidable admissions after minimally invasive hysterectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Manorot, Amanda [1 ]
Uppal, Shitanshu [1 ]
de Bear, Olivia [1 ]
Stroup, Cynthia [1 ]
Dalton, Liam [2 ]
Rolston, Aimee [1 ]
McCool, Kevin [3 ]
Reynolds, R. Kevin [1 ]
McLean, Karen [4 ]
Siedel, Jean [1 ]
Straubhar, Alli M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Obstet & Gynecol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Beaumont Hlth Syst, Royal Oak, MI USA
[4] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Buffalo, NY USA
关键词
Hysterectomy; SAME-DAY DISCHARGE; GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2024-005391
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the rate of avoidable admissions following anticipated same-day discharge for patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy and to identify risk factors associated with such admissions. Methods A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent a minimally invasive hysterectomy between March 2019 and July 2021 for a suspected gynecologic malignancy at a single tertiary care center. Pre-operatively, patients were assessed for same-day discharge versus planned admission. Reasons for day-of-surgery admission despite anticipated same-day discharge were categorized as anesthesia-related, system issues, intra-operative factors, post-operative pain, and social factors. Patients deemed not candidates for same-day discharge were defined as planned admissions. Indications were categorized as necessary or potentially avoidable. Descriptive and comparative statistics were used to summarize the cohort. Results In total, 372 patients were identified: 261 (70.2%) anticipated same-day discharges and 111 (29.8%) planned admissions. Of anticipated same-day discharges, 230/261 (88.1%) were successfully discharged, while 31/261 (11.9%) required admission. Reasons for unplanned admissions were anesthesia-related (14/31, 45.2%), system issues (7/31, 22.6%), intra-operative factors (5/31, 16.1%), post-operative pain (3/31, 9.7%), and social factors (2/31, 6.5%). Among the 111 pre-operatively planned admissions, 81 (73.0%) were necessary due to comorbidities or surgical complexity, while 30 (27.0%) were potentially avoidable because patients could have been optimized for same-day discharge. Opportunities for optimization pre-operatively included comorbidities (13/30, 43.3%), system issues (8/30, 26.7%), social factors (6/30, 20.0%), and provider preference (3/30, 10.0%). Conclusion Most patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy can be safely discharged the same day. Potentially avoidable admissions were primarily related to patient comorbidities that can be better optimized pre-operatively.
引用
收藏
页码:1431 / 1436
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Survival differences by race after minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy.
    Summey, Rebekah
    Pike, Jordyn
    Williams-Brown, Marian Yvette
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [43] Patient-reported symptoms after minimally invasive hysterectomy and association with postoperative complications
    Feinberg, Jacqueline
    Zivanovic, Oliver
    Hannon, Michael
    McCready, Taylor
    Desai, Priyanka
    Kim, Sarah H.
    Aviki, Emeline M.
    Mueller, Jennifer J.
    Jewell, Elizabeth L.
    Roche, Kara Long
    Gardner, Ginger J.
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Sonoda, Yukio
    Brown, Carol L.
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    Cracchiolo, Jennifer R.
    Leitao, Mario M.
    Broach, Vance
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 175 : 163 - 168
  • [44] Additional benefit of minimally invasive surgery to improve functional outcomes after radical hysterectomy
    Park, Jeong-Yeol
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 (02)
  • [45] Same Day Discharge after Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy in the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Baker, M.
    Ding, T.
    Zhao, Z.
    Murarka, S.
    Butler, B.
    Adam, R.
    Prescott, L.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 2) : S194 - S195
  • [46] COVID-19 as a Catalyst for Same Day Discharge After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
    Baker, Mary V.
    Zhao, Zhiguo
    Murarka, Shivani M.
    Adam, Rony A.
    Prescott, Lauren S.
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2023, 39 (04) : 170 - 176
  • [47] Regarding Effect of Regional Block on Quality of Recovery After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Reply
    Jalloul, Randa
    Hernandez, Nadia
    Pedroza, Claudia
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 31 (10) : 892 - 893
  • [48] Evaluation of Perioperative Factors Influencing Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
    Brescia, Sara
    Davitt, Katlin
    Galaviz, Veronica
    Gibbs, Jennifer
    Khan, Sameer
    Paolillo, Salvatore
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 141 : 24S - 24S
  • [49] Long-term mesh exposure after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy
    Matthews, Catherine A.
    Myers, Erinn M.
    Henley, Barbara R.
    Kenton, Kimberly
    Weaver, Erica
    Wu, Jennifer M.
    Geller, Elizabeth J.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 (01) : 291 - 296
  • [50] Predictors of same-day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications
    AlAshqar, Abdelrahman
    Wildey, Brian
    Yazdy, Golsa
    Goktepe, Metin E.
    Kilic, Gokhan S.
    Borahay, Mostafa A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 158 (02) : 308 - 317