Avoidable admissions after minimally invasive hysterectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Manorot, Amanda [1 ]
Uppal, Shitanshu [1 ]
de Bear, Olivia [1 ]
Stroup, Cynthia [1 ]
Dalton, Liam [2 ]
Rolston, Aimee [1 ]
McCool, Kevin [3 ]
Reynolds, R. Kevin [1 ]
McLean, Karen [4 ]
Siedel, Jean [1 ]
Straubhar, Alli M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Obstet & Gynecol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Beaumont Hlth Syst, Royal Oak, MI USA
[4] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Buffalo, NY USA
关键词
Hysterectomy; SAME-DAY DISCHARGE; GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2024-005391
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the rate of avoidable admissions following anticipated same-day discharge for patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy and to identify risk factors associated with such admissions. Methods A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent a minimally invasive hysterectomy between March 2019 and July 2021 for a suspected gynecologic malignancy at a single tertiary care center. Pre-operatively, patients were assessed for same-day discharge versus planned admission. Reasons for day-of-surgery admission despite anticipated same-day discharge were categorized as anesthesia-related, system issues, intra-operative factors, post-operative pain, and social factors. Patients deemed not candidates for same-day discharge were defined as planned admissions. Indications were categorized as necessary or potentially avoidable. Descriptive and comparative statistics were used to summarize the cohort. Results In total, 372 patients were identified: 261 (70.2%) anticipated same-day discharges and 111 (29.8%) planned admissions. Of anticipated same-day discharges, 230/261 (88.1%) were successfully discharged, while 31/261 (11.9%) required admission. Reasons for unplanned admissions were anesthesia-related (14/31, 45.2%), system issues (7/31, 22.6%), intra-operative factors (5/31, 16.1%), post-operative pain (3/31, 9.7%), and social factors (2/31, 6.5%). Among the 111 pre-operatively planned admissions, 81 (73.0%) were necessary due to comorbidities or surgical complexity, while 30 (27.0%) were potentially avoidable because patients could have been optimized for same-day discharge. Opportunities for optimization pre-operatively included comorbidities (13/30, 43.3%), system issues (8/30, 26.7%), social factors (6/30, 20.0%), and provider preference (3/30, 10.0%). Conclusion Most patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy can be safely discharged the same day. Potentially avoidable admissions were primarily related to patient comorbidities that can be better optimized pre-operatively.
引用
收藏
页码:1431 / 1436
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: An Analysis of Different Techniques
    Ridgeway, Beri M.
    Buechel, Megan
    Nutter, Benjamin
    Falcone, Tommaso
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 58 (04): : 732 - 739
  • [32] DETERMINANTS OF DISPARITIES IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE HYSTERECTOMY.
    Christy, Alicia Y.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 112 (03) : E353 - E353
  • [33] Minimally invasive hysterectomy in Coatis (Nasua nasua)
    Minto, Bruno W.
    Nagatsuyu, Claudia E.
    Teixeira, Carlos R.
    Zanuzzo, Felipe S.
    Candido, Thaisa D.
    Diogo, Lucia M. I.
    Macedo, Aline S.
    PESQUISA VETERINARIA BRASILEIRA, 2017, 37 (06): : 627 - 629
  • [34] Perioperative opioid management for minimally invasive hysterectomy
    Madsen, Annetta M.
    Martin, Jessica M.
    Linder, Brian J.
    Gebhart, John B.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 85 : 68 - 80
  • [35] Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy at a University Teaching Hospital
    Mitri, Michael
    Fanning, James
    Davies, Matthew
    Kesterson, Joshua
    Ural, Serdar
    Kunselman, Allen
    Harkins, Gerald
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2014, 18 (03)
  • [36] Advantages of minimally invasive hysterectomy in the era of ERAS
    Klein, Friederike
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2024, 84 (02)
  • [37] Abdominal vs Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Reply
    Wright, Jason D.
    Hershman, Dawn L.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (24): : 2677 - 2678
  • [38] Clinical Relevance of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Minimally Invasive versus Open Hysterectomy
    Eoh, Kyung Jin
    Lee, Young Joo
    Nam, Eun Ji
    Jung, Hye In
    Kim, Young Tae
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (08)
  • [39] Long-term mesh exposure after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy
    Catherine A. Matthews
    Erinn M. Myers
    Barbara R. Henley
    Kimberly Kenton
    Erica Weaver
    Jennifer M. Wu
    Elizabeth J. Geller
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2023, 34 : 291 - 296
  • [40] Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Melamed, Alexander
    Margul, Daniell J.
    Chen, Ling
    Keating, Nancy L.
    del Carmen, Marcela G.
    Yang, Junhua
    Seagle, Brandon-Luke L.
    Alexander, Amy
    Barber, Emma L.
    Rice, Laurel W.
    Wright, Jason D.
    Kocherginsky, Masha
    Shahabi, Shohreh
    Rauh-Hain, J. Alejandro
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (20): : 1905 - 1914