Implementation of an electronic prospective surveillance model for cancer rehabilitation: a mixed methods study protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Lopez, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E. [3 ,4 ]
Campbell, Kristin L. [5 ]
Langelier, David M. [6 ]
Strudwick, Gillian [7 ]
Bender, Jackie L. [1 ]
Greenland, Jonathan [8 ,9 ]
Reiman, Tony [10 ,11 ]
Jones, Jennifer M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Support Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Med Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Natl Collaborating Ctr Methods & Tools, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Dept Phys Therapy, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Univ Calgary, Dept Clin Neurosci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Fac Med, St John, NF, Canada
[9] Eastern Hlth, Dr H Bliss Murphy Canc Ctr, St John, NF, Canada
[10] St Johns Hosp, Dept Oncol, St John, NB, Canada
[11] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Med, St John, NB, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 09期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Implementation Science; oncology; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Self-Management; eHealth; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; SURVIVORS; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090449
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction An electronic prospective surveillance model (ePSM) uses patient-reported outcomes to monitor impairments along the cancer pathway for timely management. Randomised controlled trials show that ePSMs can effectively manage cancer-related impairments. However, ePSMs are not routinely embedded into practice and evidence-based approaches to implement them are limited. As such, we developed and implemented an ePSM, called REACH, across four Canadian centres. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact and quality of the implementation of REACH and explore implementation barriers and facilitators.Methods and analysis We will conduct a 16-month formative evaluation, using a single-arm mixed methods design to routinely monitor key implementation outcomes, identify barriers and adapt the implementation plan as required. Adult (>= 18 years) breast, colorectal, lymphoma or head and neck cancer survivors will be eligible to register for REACH. Enrolled patients complete brief assessments of impairments over the course of their treatment and up to 2 years post-treatment and are provided with a personalised library of self-management education, community programmes and when necessary, suggested referrals to rehabilitation services. A multifaceted implementation plan will be used to implement REACH within each clinical context. We will assess several implementation outcomes including reach, acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, fidelity, cost and sustainability. Quantitative implementation data will be collected using system usage data and evaluation surveys completed by patient participants. Qualitative data will be collected through focus groups with patient participants and interviews with clinical leadership and management, and analysis will be guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Ethics and dissemination Site-specific ethics approvals were obtained. The results from this study will be presented at academic conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. Additionally, knowledge translation materials will be co-designed with patient partners and will be disseminated to diverse knowledge users with support from our national and community partners.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Establishing cross-systems collaborations for implementation: protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study
    Alicia C. Bunger
    Emmeline Chuang
    Amanda Girth
    Kathryn E. Lancaster
    Fawn Gadel
    Marla Himmeger
    Lisa Saldana
    Byron J. Powell
    Gregory A. Aarons
    Implementation Science, 15
  • [32] Development and testing of an implementation strategy for a complex housing intervention: protocol for a mixed methods study
    Watson, Dennis P.
    Young, Jeani
    Ahonen, Emily
    Xu, Huiping
    Henderson, Macey
    Shuman, Valery
    Tolliver, Randi
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2014, 9 : 138
  • [33] The stages of implementation completion for evidence-based practice: protocol for a mixed methods study
    Lisa Saldana
    Implementation Science, 9
  • [34] Development and testing of an implementation strategy for a complex housing intervention: protocol for a mixed methods study
    Dennis P Watson
    Jeani Young
    Emily Ahonen
    Huiping Xu
    Macey Henderson
    Valery Shuman
    Randi Tolliver
    Implementation Science, 9
  • [35] Development and implementation of an intraoperative documentation protocol for enhancing patient safety in the operating room: A mixed methods protocol study
    Akbari, Leila
    Bahrami, Masoud
    Aarabi, Akram
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [36] Implementation of a perioperative multimodal rehabilitation protocol in elective colorectal surgery. A prospective randomised controlled study
    Garcia-Botello, Stephanie
    Canovas de Lucas, Raul
    Tornero, Carlos
    Escamilla, Benjamin
    Espi-Macias, Alejandro
    Esclapez-Valero, Pedro
    Flor-Lorente, Blas
    Garcia-Granero, Eduardo
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2011, 89 (03): : 159 - 166
  • [37] Rehabilitation's Vital Role in Pediatric Cancer Care: A Mixed Methods Study
    L'Hotta, Allison J.
    Rice, Hannah E.
    Sijecic, Amela
    King, Allison A.
    Mcmanus, Beth M.
    Reando, Amy
    Housten, Ashley J.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2025, 72 (05)
  • [38] Measles surveillance in Kashmir: A mixed methods study
    Bashir, Khalid
    Wani, Khurshid
    Qurieshi, Mariya
    Khan, S.
    Haq, Inaamul
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 66 (03) : 251 - 256
  • [39] A Shared Cancer Follow-Up Model of Care Between General Practitioners and Radiation Oncologists for Patients With Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancer: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Implementation Study
    Sandell, Tiffany
    Schuetze, Heike
    Miller, Andrew
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2021, 10 (01):
  • [40] Process evaluation in practice based research networks: a study protocol for a mixed-methods implementation study
    Sanftenberg, Linda
    Dreischulte, Tobias
    Haerdtlein, Annette
    Kosub, Helena
    Gagyor, Ildiko
    Kurotschka, Peter Konstantin
    Kuehlein, Thomas
    Burggraf, Larissa
    Eck, Stefanie
    Roos, Marco
    Gensichen, Jochen
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (07):