Implementation of an electronic prospective surveillance model for cancer rehabilitation: a mixed methods study protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Lopez, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E. [3 ,4 ]
Campbell, Kristin L. [5 ]
Langelier, David M. [6 ]
Strudwick, Gillian [7 ]
Bender, Jackie L. [1 ]
Greenland, Jonathan [8 ,9 ]
Reiman, Tony [10 ,11 ]
Jones, Jennifer M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Support Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Med Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Natl Collaborating Ctr Methods & Tools, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Dept Phys Therapy, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Univ Calgary, Dept Clin Neurosci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Fac Med, St John, NF, Canada
[9] Eastern Hlth, Dr H Bliss Murphy Canc Ctr, St John, NF, Canada
[10] St Johns Hosp, Dept Oncol, St John, NB, Canada
[11] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Med, St John, NB, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 09期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Implementation Science; oncology; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Self-Management; eHealth; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; SURVIVORS; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090449
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction An electronic prospective surveillance model (ePSM) uses patient-reported outcomes to monitor impairments along the cancer pathway for timely management. Randomised controlled trials show that ePSMs can effectively manage cancer-related impairments. However, ePSMs are not routinely embedded into practice and evidence-based approaches to implement them are limited. As such, we developed and implemented an ePSM, called REACH, across four Canadian centres. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact and quality of the implementation of REACH and explore implementation barriers and facilitators.Methods and analysis We will conduct a 16-month formative evaluation, using a single-arm mixed methods design to routinely monitor key implementation outcomes, identify barriers and adapt the implementation plan as required. Adult (>= 18 years) breast, colorectal, lymphoma or head and neck cancer survivors will be eligible to register for REACH. Enrolled patients complete brief assessments of impairments over the course of their treatment and up to 2 years post-treatment and are provided with a personalised library of self-management education, community programmes and when necessary, suggested referrals to rehabilitation services. A multifaceted implementation plan will be used to implement REACH within each clinical context. We will assess several implementation outcomes including reach, acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, fidelity, cost and sustainability. Quantitative implementation data will be collected using system usage data and evaluation surveys completed by patient participants. Qualitative data will be collected through focus groups with patient participants and interviews with clinical leadership and management, and analysis will be guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Ethics and dissemination Site-specific ethics approvals were obtained. The results from this study will be presented at academic conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. Additionally, knowledge translation materials will be co-designed with patient partners and will be disseminated to diverse knowledge users with support from our national and community partners.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implementation and evaluation of the WHO maternity care model: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol
    Abdolalipour, Somayeh
    Abbasalizadeh, Shamsi
    Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi, Sakineh
    Abbasalizadeh, Fatemeh
    Jahanfar, Shayesteh
    Mirghafourvand, Mojgan
    FRONTIERS IN GLOBAL WOMENS HEALTH, 2024, 5
  • [22] Protocol for a prospective, longitudinal mixed-methods case study: supporting a Model of Care for Healthier Adolescents (The MoCHA study)
    Hayes, Claire
    Palmer, Victoria J.
    Simmons, Magenta
    Hamilton, Bridget
    Simons, Christine
    Hopwood, Malcolm
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [23] The Influence of Context on Implementation and Improvement: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Secondary Analyses Study
    Estabrooks, Carole
    Song, Yuting
    Anderson, Ruth
    Beeber, Anna
    Berta, Whitney
    Chamberlain, Stephanie
    Cummings, Greta
    Duan, Yinfei
    Hayduk, Leslie
    Hoben, Matthias
    Iaconi, Alba
    Lanham, Holly
    Perez, Janelle
    Wang, Jing
    Norton, Peter
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2022, 11 (09):
  • [24] Factors influencing the implementation of shared decision-making in breast cancer care: protocol for a mixed-methods study
    Bravo, Paulina
    Dois, Angelina
    Villarroel, Luis
    Gonzalez-Agueero, Marcela
    Fernandez-Gonzalez, Loreto
    Sanchez, Cesar
    Martinez, Alejandra
    Turen, Valentina
    Quezada, Constanza
    Guasalaga, Maria Elisabeth
    Haerter, Martin
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [25] Linked symptom monitoring and depression treatment programmes for specialist cancer services: protocol for a mixed-methods implementation study
    Wanat, Marta
    Walker, Jane
    Burke, Katy
    Sevdalis, Nick
    Richardson, Alison
    Mulick, Amy
    Frost, Chris
    Sharpe, Michael
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (06):
  • [26] An exploration of men's experiences of undergoing active surveillance for favourable-risk prostate cancer: A mixed methods study protocol
    Ruane-McAteer, Eimear
    O'Sullivan, Joe
    Porter, Sam
    Venderbos, Lionne
    Prue, Gillian
    BMC CANCER, 2016, 16
  • [27] The stages of implementation completion for evidence-based practice: protocol for a mixed methods study
    Saldana, Lisa
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2014, 9
  • [28] An exploration of men's experiences of undergoing active surveillance for favourable-risk prostate cancer: a mixed methods study protocol
    Ruane-McAteer, Eimear
    O'Sullivan, Joe
    Porter, Sam
    Prue, Gillian
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 25 : 16 - 17
  • [29] An exploration of men’s experiences of undergoing active surveillance for favourable-risk prostate cancer: A mixed methods study protocol
    Eimear Ruane-McAteer
    Joe O’Sullivan
    Sam Porter
    Lionne Venderbos
    Gillian Prue
    BMC Cancer, 16
  • [30] Establishing cross-systems collaborations for implementation: protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study
    Bunger, Alicia C.
    Chuang, Emmeline
    Girth, Amanda
    Lancaster, Kathryn E.
    Gadel, Fawn
    Himmeger, Marla
    Saldana, Lisa
    Powell, Byron J.
    Aarons, Gregory A.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2020, 15 (01)