Implementation of an electronic prospective surveillance model for cancer rehabilitation: a mixed methods study protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Lopez, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E. [3 ,4 ]
Campbell, Kristin L. [5 ]
Langelier, David M. [6 ]
Strudwick, Gillian [7 ]
Bender, Jackie L. [1 ]
Greenland, Jonathan [8 ,9 ]
Reiman, Tony [10 ,11 ]
Jones, Jennifer M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Support Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Med Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Natl Collaborating Ctr Methods & Tools, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Dept Phys Therapy, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Univ Calgary, Dept Clin Neurosci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Fac Med, St John, NF, Canada
[9] Eastern Hlth, Dr H Bliss Murphy Canc Ctr, St John, NF, Canada
[10] St Johns Hosp, Dept Oncol, St John, NB, Canada
[11] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Med, St John, NB, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 09期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Implementation Science; oncology; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Self-Management; eHealth; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; SURVIVORS; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090449
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction An electronic prospective surveillance model (ePSM) uses patient-reported outcomes to monitor impairments along the cancer pathway for timely management. Randomised controlled trials show that ePSMs can effectively manage cancer-related impairments. However, ePSMs are not routinely embedded into practice and evidence-based approaches to implement them are limited. As such, we developed and implemented an ePSM, called REACH, across four Canadian centres. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact and quality of the implementation of REACH and explore implementation barriers and facilitators.Methods and analysis We will conduct a 16-month formative evaluation, using a single-arm mixed methods design to routinely monitor key implementation outcomes, identify barriers and adapt the implementation plan as required. Adult (>= 18 years) breast, colorectal, lymphoma or head and neck cancer survivors will be eligible to register for REACH. Enrolled patients complete brief assessments of impairments over the course of their treatment and up to 2 years post-treatment and are provided with a personalised library of self-management education, community programmes and when necessary, suggested referrals to rehabilitation services. A multifaceted implementation plan will be used to implement REACH within each clinical context. We will assess several implementation outcomes including reach, acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, fidelity, cost and sustainability. Quantitative implementation data will be collected using system usage data and evaluation surveys completed by patient participants. Qualitative data will be collected through focus groups with patient participants and interviews with clinical leadership and management, and analysis will be guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Ethics and dissemination Site-specific ethics approvals were obtained. The results from this study will be presented at academic conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. Additionally, knowledge translation materials will be co-designed with patient partners and will be disseminated to diverse knowledge users with support from our national and community partners.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of implementation mapping to develop a multifaceted implementation strategy for an electronic prospective surveillance model for cancer rehabilitation
    Lopez, Christian J.
    Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E.
    Tanyoas, Mounir
    Campbell, Kristin L.
    Bender, Jackie L.
    Strudwick, Gillian
    Langelier, David M.
    Reiman, Tony
    Greenland, Jonathan
    Jones, Jennifer M.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 5 (01):
  • [2] A pre-implementation examination of barriers and facilitators of an electronic prospective surveillance model for cancer rehabilitation: a qualitative study
    Lopez, Christian J.
    Jones, Jennifer M.
    Campbell, Kristin L.
    Bender, Jackie L.
    Strudwick, Gillian
    Langelier, David M.
    Reiman, Tony
    Greenland, Jonathan
    Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [3] A pre-implementation examination of barriers and facilitators of an electronic prospective surveillance model for cancer rehabilitation: a qualitative study
    Christian J. Lopez
    Jennifer M. Jones
    Kristin L. Campbell
    Jackie L. Bender
    Gillian Strudwick
    David M. Langelier
    Tony Reiman
    Jonathan Greenland
    Sarah E. Neil-Sztramko
    BMC Health Services Research, 24
  • [4] Stakeholder perspectives on dissemination and implementation of a prospective surveillance model of rehabilitation for breast cancer treatment
    Stout, Nicole L.
    Andrews, Kimberly
    Binkley, Jill M.
    Schmitz, Kathryn H.
    Smith, Robert A.
    CANCER, 2012, 118 : 2331 - 2334
  • [5] Establishing injury surveillance in emergency departments in Nepal: protocol for mixed methods prospective study
    Magnus, Dan
    Bhatta, Santosh
    Mytton, Julie
    Joshi, Elisha
    Bird, Emma L.
    Bhatta, Sumiksha
    Manandhar, Sunil Raja
    Joshi, Sunil Kumar
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [6] Establishing injury surveillance in emergency departments in Nepal: protocol for mixed methods prospective study
    Dan Magnus
    Santosh Bhatta
    Julie Mytton
    Elisha Joshi
    Emma L. Bird
    Sumiksha Bhatta
    Sunil Raja Manandhar
    Sunil Kumar Joshi
    BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [7] A prospective surveillance model for rehabilitation for women with breast cancer
    Stout, Nicole L.
    Binkley, Jill M.
    Schmitz, Kathryn H.
    Andrews, Kimberly
    Hayes, Sandra C.
    Campbell, Kristin L.
    McNeely, Margaret L.
    Soballe, Peter W.
    Berger, Ann M.
    Cheville, Andrea L.
    Fabian, Carol
    Gerber, Lynn H.
    Harris, Susan R.
    Johansson, Karin
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Prosnitz, Robert G.
    Smith, Robert A.
    CANCER, 2012, 118 : 2191 - 2200
  • [8] Readiness for cancer rehabilitation in Denmark: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed methods study
    Kristiansen, Maria
    Adamsen, Lis
    Hendriksen, Carsten
    BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (11):
  • [9] A prospective surveillance model for physical rehabilitation of women with breast cancer
    Stubblefield, Michael D.
    McNeely, Margaret L.
    Alfano, Catherine M.
    Mayer, Deborah K.
    CANCER, 2012, 118 : 2250 - 2260
  • [10] Implementation of electronic prospective surveillance models in cancer care: a scoping review
    Lopez, Christian J.
    Teggart, Kylie
    Ahmed, Mohammed
    Borhani, Anita
    Kong, Jeffrey
    Fazelzad, Rouhi
    Langelier, David M.
    Campbell, Kristin L.
    Reiman, Tony
    Greenland, Jonathan
    Jones, Jennifer M.
    Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2023, 18 (01)