Quantifying marginal utilities of ecosystem services for sustainable management

被引:2
|
作者
Bai, Yang [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ali, Maroof [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhou, Yi [5 ]
Yang, Shiliang [6 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Ctr Integrat Conservat, Mengla 666303, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Yunnan Key Lab Conservat Trop Rainforests & Asian, Xishuangbanna Trop Bot Garden, Mengla 666303, Peoples R China
[3] Yunnan Int Joint Lab Southeast Asia Biodivers Cons, Menglun 666303, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[5] Yangtze River Delta Ecol Dev Co LTD, Jiaxing 314050, Peoples R China
[6] Guizhou Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Guiyang 550025, Peoples R China
关键词
Cultural ecosystem service; Regulatory ecosystem service; Marginal characteristics; Wetland park; Impact factors; SOIL-EROSION; RESTORATION; PERCEPTIONS; COVER; AREA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143353
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Understanding the marginal characteristics of ecosystem services (ESs) is crucial for sustainable management. However, there is limited research on quantifying thresholds for ESs, making it challenging for policymakers to plan effectively. This study established a framework to assess the influencing factors and marginal characteristics of cultural and regulatory ecosystem services (RES) in the Taihu Lake Basin of China and its wetland parks. The framework uses a Structural Equation Model to analyze the impact of visitors' attributes on the perception of different types of cultural ecosystem services (CES). It also employed the InVEST model to quantify the spatial patterns of RES in the basin. Multiple regression analysis and marginal utility theory were used to examine the influencing factors and marginal utilities for different types of cultural and regulatory services. The findings reveal that 1) Education level, income, gender, and age significantly influence the perception of five types of CES provision, with different factors affecting each type. 2) Most park characteristics influence the CES provision score, with their maximum and marginal utility peaks. For instance, as patch density (PD) increases, the score for recreational services initially decreases, then increases, and finally decreases again, reaching a peak of 0.50 at a PD of 325.60. The marginal utility of PD follows a similar pattern, initially increasing and then decreasing, with an increase in utility observed in the range of 0 < PD < 187.80. When PD reaches 187.80, it attains its maximum utility, indicating the point of highest efficiency for PD's impact on recreational services. 3) Heterogeneity exists in the spatial distribution of RES within the basin, with different landscape features providing varying marginal benefits for services like water supply, water purification, carbon storage, and soil erosion prevention. Carbon storage demonstrates an 'increase-then-decrease' pattern in response to rising FP (Percentage of forest area), reaching a maximum value of 13129.3 t/km2 2 at FP of 66.4. The marginal utility of FP also exhibits a 'rise-then- fall' trend, increasing up to FP of 30.4, where it peaks at 230.5. This peak represents the point of maximum efficiency in FP's influence on carbon storage services. 4) The effects of park and landscape characteristics on cultural and regulatory services exhibit marginal utilities that can be used to determine the optimal scale and location of these features to maximize ecological benefits. This research aims to expand the scope of ESs assessment and provide insights from wetland parks for broader environmental planning and optimization.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bundling of ecosystem services to increase forestland value and enhance sustainable forest management
    Deal, Robert L.
    Cochran, Bobby
    LaRocco, Gina
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2012, 17 : 69 - 76
  • [32] Tools for Sustainable Soil Management: Soil Ecosystem Services, EROI and Economic Analysis
    Jonsson, Jon Orvar G.
    Davidsdottir, Brynhildur
    Nikolaidis, Nikolaos P.
    Giannakis, Georgios V.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 157 : 109 - 119
  • [33] SPATIAL DATA AS A CONDITION FOR SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF UTILITIES
    Mlittar, Jurij
    GEODETSKI VESTNIK, 2008, 52 (04) : 812 - 821
  • [34] Energy crops in marginal areas: Scenario-based assessment through ecosystem services, as support to sustainable development
    Cervelli, Elena
    di Perta, Ester Scotto
    Pindozzi, Stefania
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 113
  • [35] Natural ecosystem design and control imperatives for sustainable ecosystem services
    Patten, Bernard C.
    ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2010, 7 (03) : 282 - 291
  • [36] Quantifying impacts of livestock production on ecosystem services: Insights into grazing management under vegetation restoration
    Li, Ting
    Feng, Weihan
    Lu, Yihe
    Ma, Liyang
    Liu, Yuanxin
    Luo, Ying
    Liang, Haibin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 470
  • [37] Quantifying ecosystem services of rewetted peatlands - the MoorFutures methodologies
    Tanneberger, Franziska
    Berghoefer, Augustin
    Brust, Kristina
    Hammerich, Jenny
    Holsten, Bettina
    Joosten, Hans
    Michaelis, Dierk
    Moritz, Fiedje
    Reichelt, Felix
    Schaefer, Achim
    Scheid, Aaron
    Trepel, Michael
    Wahren, Andreas
    Couwenberg, John
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 163
  • [38] Assessing, quantifying and valuing the ecosystem services of coastal lagoons
    Newton, Alice
    Brito, Ana C.
    Icely, John D.
    Derolez, Valerie
    Clara, Ines
    Angus, Stewart
    Schernewski, Gerald
    Inacio, Miguel
    Lillebo, Ana I.
    Sousa, Ana I.
    Bejaoui, Bechir
    Solidoro, Cosimo
    Tosic, Marko
    Canedo-Arguelles, Miguel
    Yamamuro, Masumi
    Reizopoulou, Sofia
    Tseng, Hsiao-Chun
    Canu, Donata
    Roselli, Leonilde
    Maanan, Mohamed
    Cristina, Sonia
    Carolina Ruiz-Fernandez, Ana
    de Lima, Ricardo F.
    Kjerfve, Bjorn
    Rubio-Cisneros, Nadia
    Perez-Ruzafa, Angel
    Marcos, Concepcion
    Pastres, Roberto
    Pranovi, Fabio
    Snoussi, Maria
    Turpie, Jane
    Tuchkovenko, Yurii
    Dyack, Brenda
    Brookes, Justin
    Povilanskas, Ramunas
    Khokhlov, Valeriy
    JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2018, 44 : 50 - 65
  • [39] SUSTAINABLE USE AND ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT
    PELL, B
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1995, 9 (02) : 239 - 240
  • [40] Quantifying the contribution of riparian soils to the provision of ecosystem services
    de Sosa, Laura L.
    Glanville, Helen C.
    Marshall, Miles R.
    Williams, A. Prysor
    Jones, Davey L.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 624 : 807 - 819