Quantifying marginal utilities of ecosystem services for sustainable management

被引:2
|
作者
Bai, Yang [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ali, Maroof [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhou, Yi [5 ]
Yang, Shiliang [6 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Ctr Integrat Conservat, Mengla 666303, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Yunnan Key Lab Conservat Trop Rainforests & Asian, Xishuangbanna Trop Bot Garden, Mengla 666303, Peoples R China
[3] Yunnan Int Joint Lab Southeast Asia Biodivers Cons, Menglun 666303, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[5] Yangtze River Delta Ecol Dev Co LTD, Jiaxing 314050, Peoples R China
[6] Guizhou Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Guiyang 550025, Peoples R China
关键词
Cultural ecosystem service; Regulatory ecosystem service; Marginal characteristics; Wetland park; Impact factors; SOIL-EROSION; RESTORATION; PERCEPTIONS; COVER; AREA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143353
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Understanding the marginal characteristics of ecosystem services (ESs) is crucial for sustainable management. However, there is limited research on quantifying thresholds for ESs, making it challenging for policymakers to plan effectively. This study established a framework to assess the influencing factors and marginal characteristics of cultural and regulatory ecosystem services (RES) in the Taihu Lake Basin of China and its wetland parks. The framework uses a Structural Equation Model to analyze the impact of visitors' attributes on the perception of different types of cultural ecosystem services (CES). It also employed the InVEST model to quantify the spatial patterns of RES in the basin. Multiple regression analysis and marginal utility theory were used to examine the influencing factors and marginal utilities for different types of cultural and regulatory services. The findings reveal that 1) Education level, income, gender, and age significantly influence the perception of five types of CES provision, with different factors affecting each type. 2) Most park characteristics influence the CES provision score, with their maximum and marginal utility peaks. For instance, as patch density (PD) increases, the score for recreational services initially decreases, then increases, and finally decreases again, reaching a peak of 0.50 at a PD of 325.60. The marginal utility of PD follows a similar pattern, initially increasing and then decreasing, with an increase in utility observed in the range of 0 < PD < 187.80. When PD reaches 187.80, it attains its maximum utility, indicating the point of highest efficiency for PD's impact on recreational services. 3) Heterogeneity exists in the spatial distribution of RES within the basin, with different landscape features providing varying marginal benefits for services like water supply, water purification, carbon storage, and soil erosion prevention. Carbon storage demonstrates an 'increase-then-decrease' pattern in response to rising FP (Percentage of forest area), reaching a maximum value of 13129.3 t/km2 2 at FP of 66.4. The marginal utility of FP also exhibits a 'rise-then- fall' trend, increasing up to FP of 30.4, where it peaks at 230.5. This peak represents the point of maximum efficiency in FP's influence on carbon storage services. 4) The effects of park and landscape characteristics on cultural and regulatory services exhibit marginal utilities that can be used to determine the optimal scale and location of these features to maximize ecological benefits. This research aims to expand the scope of ESs assessment and provide insights from wetland parks for broader environmental planning and optimization.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A framework for sustainable management of ecosystem services and disservices in perennial grassland agroecosystems
    Paudel, Shishir
    Cobb, Adam B.
    Boughton, Elizabeth H.
    Spiegal, Sheri
    Boughton, Raoul K.
    Silveira, Maria L.
    Swain, Hilary M.
    Reuter, Ryan
    Goodman, Laura E.
    Steiner, Jean L.
    ECOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (11):
  • [22] ASSESSMENT OF ECOSYSTEMS AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES FOR SUSTAINABLE LAND USE MANAGEMENT IN LATVIA
    Konstantinova, Elina
    Brunina, Liga
    Persevica, Aija
    Honavko, Inga
    16TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2017, : 1145 - 1150
  • [23] Multiple values for the management and sustainable use of coastal and marine ecosystem services
    Chakraborty, Shamik
    Gasparatos, Alexandros
    Blasiak, Robert
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 41
  • [24] A Perspective on the Impact of Grassland Degradation on Ecosystem Services for the Purpose of Sustainable Management
    Lyu, Xin
    Li, Xiaobing
    Dang, Dongliang
    Dou, Huashun
    Wang, Kai
    Gong, Jirui
    Wang, Hong
    Liu, Shiliang
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [25] Quantifying the Contribution of Organisms to the Provision of Ecosystem Services
    Luck, Gary W.
    Harrington, Richard
    Harrison, Paula A.
    Kremen, Claire
    Berry, Pam M.
    Bugter, Rob
    Dawson, Terence P.
    de Bello, Francesco
    Diaz, Sandra
    Feld, Christian K.
    Haslett, John R.
    Hering, Daniel
    Kontogianni, Areti
    Lavorel, Sandra
    Rounsevell, Mark
    Samways, Michael J.
    Sandin, Leonard
    Settele, Josef
    Sykes, Martin T.
    van den Hove, Sybille
    Vandewalle, Marie
    Zobel, Martin
    BIOSCIENCE, 2009, 59 (03) : 223 - 235
  • [26] METHODS AND TECHNIQUES FOR QUANTIFYING THE VALUE OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
    Gradinaru, Giani
    ROMANIAN STATISTICAL REVIEW, 2013, (05) : 29 - 44
  • [27] A review of methods for quantifying urban ecosystem services
    Ma, Yue
    Yang, Jun
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2025, 253
  • [28] The theoretical model for quantifying the value of ecosystem services
    Zhao, Sheng
    Wu, Changwen
    Hong, Huasheng
    Wang, Weiping
    JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2008, 136 : S767 - S767
  • [29] From sustainable development to ecosystem services
    Montes, C.
    ECOSISTEMAS, 2007, 16 (03): : 1 - 3
  • [30] Ecosystem Provisioning Services Automated Valuation Process Model for Sustainable Land Management
    Holms, Jurijs
    Arhipova, Irina
    Tulbure, Ildiko
    Vitols, Gatis
    ICTE 2016, 2017, 104 : 65 - 72