A physics-informed neural network framework for multi-physics coupling microfluidic problems

被引:1
|
作者
Sun, Runze [1 ,2 ]
Jeong, Hyogu [2 ]
Zhao, Jiachen [2 ]
Gou, Yixing [1 ]
Sauret, Emilie [2 ]
Li, Zirui [1 ]
Gu, Yuantong [2 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Univ Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Mech Med & Proc Engn, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Microfluidic; Electrokinetic; Physics informed neural network; Deep learning; Electroosmotic flow; MG2+/LI+ RATIO BRINES; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; FLOW; EXTRACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.compfluid.2024.106421
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Microfluidic systems have various scientific and industrial applications, providing a powerful means to manipulate fluids and particles on a small scale. As a crucial method to underlying mechanisms and guiding the design of microfluidic devices, traditional numerical methods such as the Finite Element Method (FEM) simulating microfluidic systems are limited by the computational cost and mesh generating of resolving the smaller spatiotemporal features. Recently, a Physics-informed neural network (PINN) was introduced as a powerful numerical tool for solving partial differential equations (PDEs). PINN simplifies discretizing computational domains, ensuring accurate results and significantly improving computational efficiency after training. Therefore, we propose a PINN-based modeling framework to solve the governing equations of electrokinetic microfluidic systems. The neural networks, designed to respect the governing physics law such as Nernst-Planck, Poisson, and Navier-Stokes (NPN) equations defined by PDEs, are trained to approximate accurate solutions without requiring any labeled data. Several typical electrokinetic problems, such as Electromigration, Ion concentration polarization (ICP), and Electroosmotic flow (EOF), were investigated in this study. Notably, the findings demonstrate the exceptional capacity of the PINN framework to deliver high-precision outcomes for highly coupled multi-physics problems, particularly highlighted by the EOF case. When using 20 x 10 sample points to train the model (the same mesh nodes used for FEM), the relative error of EOF velocity from the PINN is similar to 0.02 %, whereas the relative error of the FEM is similar to 1.23 %. In addition, PINNs demonstrate excellent interpolation capability, the relative error of the EOF velocity decreases slightly at the interpolation points compared to training points, approximately 0.0001 %. More importantly, in simulating strongly nonlinear problems such as the ICP case, PINNs exhibit a unique advantage as they can provide accurate solutions with sparse sample points, whereas FEM fails to produce correct physical results using the same mesh nodes. Although the training time for PINN (100-200 min) is higher than the FEM computational time, the ability of PINN to achieve high accuracy results on sparse sample points, strong capability to fit nonlinear problems highlights its potential for reducing computational resources. We also demonstrate the ability of PINN to solve inverse problems in microfluidic systems and use transfer learning to accelerate PINN training for various species parameter settings. The numerical results demonstrate that the PINN model shows promising advantages in achieving high-accuracy solutions, modeling strong nolinear problems, strong interpolation capability, and inferring unknown parameters in simulating multi-physics coupling microfluidic systems.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Physics-Informed Recurrent Neural Network for RRAM Modeling
    Sha, Yanliang
    Lan, Jun
    Li, Yida
    Chen, Quan
    ELECTRONICS, 2023, 12 (13)
  • [22] A systematic resilience assessment framework for multi-state systems based on physics-informed neural network
    He, Yuxuan
    Zio, Enrico
    Yang, Zhaoming
    Xiang, Qi
    Fan, Lin
    He, Qian
    Peng, Shiliang
    Zhang, Zongjie
    Su, Huai
    Zhang, Jinjun
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2025, 257
  • [23] Physics-informed Neural Network for Quadrotor Dynamical Modeling
    Gu, Weibin
    Primatesta, Stefano
    Rizzo, Alessandro
    ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2024, 171
  • [24] Parareal with a Physics-Informed Neural Network as Coarse Propagator
    Ibrahim, Abdul Qadir
    Goetschel, Sebastian
    Ruprecht, Daniel
    EURO-PAR 2023: PARALLEL PROCESSING, 2023, 14100 : 649 - 663
  • [25] A physics-informed neural network for Kresling origami structures
    Liu, Chen-Xu
    Wang, Xinghao
    Liu, Weiming
    Yang, Yi-Fan
    Yu, Gui-Lan
    Liu, Zhanli
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 269
  • [26] Realizing the Potential of Physics-Informed Neural Network in Modelling
    Kheirandish, Zahra
    Schulz, Wolfgang
    JOURNAL OF LASER MICRO NANOENGINEERING, 2024, 19 (03): : 209 - 213
  • [27] Physics-informed deep neural network for image denoising
    Xypakis, Emmanouil
    De Turris, Valeria
    Gala, Fabrizio
    Ruocco, Giancarlo
    Leonetti, Marco
    OPTICS EXPRESS, 2023, 31 (26) : 43838 - 43849
  • [28] Physics-informed neural network for polarimetric underwater imaging
    Hu, Haofeng
    Han, Yilin
    Li, Xiaobo
    Jiang, Liubing
    Che, Li
    Liu, Tiegen
    Zhai, Jingsheng
    OPTICS EXPRESS, 2022, 30 (13) : 22512 - 22522
  • [29] Physics-informed neural network for diffusive wave model
    Hou, Qingzhi
    Li, Yixin
    Singh, Vijay P.
    Sun, Zewei
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2024, 637
  • [30] Outlier-resistant physics-informed neural network
    Duarte, D. H. G.
    Lima, P. D. S. de
    Araujo, J. M. de
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2025, 111 (02)