A group decision-making method for technology selection of petrochemical enterprises

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Xiaofang [1 ]
Liao, Huchang [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Energy conservation and emission reduction; Petrochemical enterprises; Large-scale group decision making; Rank centrality; Individual differences; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS; PREFERENCE RELATIONS; RANK CENTRALITY; MODEL; CONSENSUS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2024.114443
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Selecting appropriate energy conservation and emission reduction technologies is essential for the sustainable developments of petrochemical enterprises. It usually involves experienced experts from multi -domain and thus can be regarded as a large-scale group decision -making problem. Existing methods assumed that different experts use the same linguistic term set following the same semantics to express their evaluation values, and derived the ranking of alternatives by an indirectly obtained group preference matrix. Such an approach may induce information loss. To avoid these defects, this study introduces a model based on rank centrality and expert differences to choose appropriate technologies for petrochemical enterprises. First, an attitude parameter is introduced into a linguistic scale function to unify different judgment benchmarks of experts regarding the same linguistic term. Next, a direct weight elicitation method based on rank centrality is developed to deduce the individual rank vector of alternatives. A grey clustering method based on the similarities of individual rank vectors is extended to cluster experts into small groups, and the silhouette coefficient is used to determine clusters weights. Afterwards, the rank vectors of alternatives corresponding to subgroups and the global rank vector are calculated by the weighted averaging operator. Alternatives are ranked by the rank vector of the global group. Finally, four technologies were evaluated by the model, and the preferred technology was identified. The findings indicate that the proposed technology selection model alleviates information loss, elevates group consensus level, and provides a perspective for petrochemical enterprises in search of energy conservation and emission reduction technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Data Science Technology Selection: Development of a Decision-Making Approach
    Nazliel, Kerem
    Kayabay, Kerem
    Gokalp, Mert Onuralp
    Gokalp, Ebru
    Eren, Erhan
    2022 IEEE TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (TEMSCON EUROPE), 2022, : 172 - 178
  • [32] A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making method and its application to healthcare waste treatment technology selection
    Goldani, Nastaran
    Ishizaka, Alessio
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [33] The Application of VE in Business Decision-making Evaluation of Technology Selection
    Zhang, Tie-shan
    Huang, Wei
    ICVE&VM 2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VALUE ENGINEERING AND VALUE MANAGEMENT, 2009, : 552 - 558
  • [34] A simple decision-making approach for information technology solution selection
    Zelenkov Y.
    International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology, 2019, 14 (01): : 56 - 79
  • [35] A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method
    R. V. Rao
    J. P. Davim
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2008, 35 : 751 - 760
  • [36] A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method
    Rao, R. V.
    Davim, J. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 35 (7-8): : 751 - 760
  • [37] International market selection by small enterprises: Cognitive biases and heuristics in decision-making
    Likhareva, Natalya D.
    Gafforova, Elena B.
    Novikov, Igor A.
    UPRAVLENETS-THE MANAGER, 2022, 13 (01): : 84 - 99
  • [38] The Selection of Sales Managers in Enterprises by Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-Making
    Wang, Yu-Jie
    Kao, Chao-Shun
    Liu, Li-Jen
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, AICI 2010, PT II, 2010, 6320 : 142 - 151
  • [39] MES System Selection Decision-Making Approach for Automobile Parts Manufacturing Enterprises
    Wang Qifeng
    Hong Chunyan
    PROGRESS IN MEASUREMENT AND TESTING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2010, 108-111 : 736 - 740
  • [40] NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUE - A METHOD OF DECISION-MAKING BY COMMITTEE
    HORTON, JN
    ANAESTHESIA, 1980, 35 (08) : 811 - 814