A group decision-making method for technology selection of petrochemical enterprises

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Xiaofang [1 ]
Liao, Huchang [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Energy conservation and emission reduction; Petrochemical enterprises; Large-scale group decision making; Rank centrality; Individual differences; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS; PREFERENCE RELATIONS; RANK CENTRALITY; MODEL; CONSENSUS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2024.114443
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Selecting appropriate energy conservation and emission reduction technologies is essential for the sustainable developments of petrochemical enterprises. It usually involves experienced experts from multi -domain and thus can be regarded as a large-scale group decision -making problem. Existing methods assumed that different experts use the same linguistic term set following the same semantics to express their evaluation values, and derived the ranking of alternatives by an indirectly obtained group preference matrix. Such an approach may induce information loss. To avoid these defects, this study introduces a model based on rank centrality and expert differences to choose appropriate technologies for petrochemical enterprises. First, an attitude parameter is introduced into a linguistic scale function to unify different judgment benchmarks of experts regarding the same linguistic term. Next, a direct weight elicitation method based on rank centrality is developed to deduce the individual rank vector of alternatives. A grey clustering method based on the similarities of individual rank vectors is extended to cluster experts into small groups, and the silhouette coefficient is used to determine clusters weights. Afterwards, the rank vectors of alternatives corresponding to subgroups and the global rank vector are calculated by the weighted averaging operator. Alternatives are ranked by the rank vector of the global group. Finally, four technologies were evaluated by the model, and the preferred technology was identified. The findings indicate that the proposed technology selection model alleviates information loss, elevates group consensus level, and provides a perspective for petrochemical enterprises in search of energy conservation and emission reduction technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Selection Method for Kernel Function in Nonparametric Extrapolation Based on Multicriteria Decision-Making Technology
    Wang, Jixin
    Liu, Yan
    Zeng, Xiaohua
    Zhou, Zhenping
    Wang, Naixiang
    Shen, Wanghao
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2013, 2013
  • [22] A FUZZY MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHOD FOR TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER STRATEGY SELECTION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
    CHANG, PL
    CHEN, YC
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1994, 63 (02) : 131 - 139
  • [23] GROUP DECISION-MAKING
    VITEK, M
    EKONOMICKO-MATEMATICKY OBZOR, 1983, 19 (01): : 25 - 41
  • [24] A fuzzy multicriteria decision-making method for material selection
    Liao, TW
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 1996, 15 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [25] Research on Factors Affecting the Acceptance of E-business Technology and Decision-Making Method in Manufacturing Enterprises
    Lan, Xiaoyi
    Su, Bing
    Ji, Hao
    NINTH WUHAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS, VOLS I-III, 2010, : 1995 - 1999
  • [26] A PROJECT PORTFOLIO SELECTION PROBLEM IN A GROUP DECISION-MAKING CONTEXT
    Carazo, Ana F.
    Contreras, Ignacio
    Gomez, Trinidad
    Perez, Fatima
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION, 2012, 8 (01) : 243 - 261
  • [27] Hybrid Constructed Wetland Selection as a Group Decision-Making Problem
    Zorica Srđević
    Bojan Srđević
    Kosana Suvočarev
    Laslo Galamboš
    Water Resources Management, 2020, 34 : 295 - 310
  • [28] Hybrid Constructed Wetland Selection as a Group Decision-Making Problem
    Srdevic, Zorica
    Srdevic, Bojan
    Suvocarev, Kosana
    Galambos, Laslo
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2020, 34 (01) : 295 - 310
  • [29] A GROUP DECISION-MAKING APPROACH TO RESEARCH PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION
    KING, HT
    BUONGIORNO, J
    MONTREY, HM
    FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 1990, 40 (04) : 15 - 21
  • [30] The selection of surface mining technology using a decision-making system
    Zhang, R
    Zhang, Y
    Ren, TX
    Denby, B
    MINE PLANNING AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION 1998, 1998, : 3 - 8