Key Points of Discussion in Scientific Research Evaluation: Peer Review, Bibliometrics and Relevance

被引：7
|
作者：
Fernanda Sarthou, Nerina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Nacl San Martin, Ciencia Polit, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, RA-1033 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Univ Nacl Ctr Prov, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
来源：
REVISTA DE ESTUDIOS SOCIALES | 2016年 / 58期
关键词：
Bibliometrics (Thesaurus); research evaluation; peer review; relevance (Author's keywords); SCIENCE; IMPACT; POLICY; STATE; BIAS;
D O I：
10.7440/res58.2016.06
中图分类号：
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号：
摘要：
This article seeks to bring together in a single document the set of issues surrounding the definition and implementation of mechanisms and criteria relating to the evaluation of scientific research. It revisits and orders the basic agreements regarding their defects and the proposals for countering them based on a bibliographical review revolving around three questions: who participates in the assessment; how the assessment is carried out; and what is to be evaluated. Finally, it briefly presents some notes referring to the specific literature generated from Latin America, highlighting the limited space dedicated to this topic until now.
引用
收藏
页码：76 / 86
页数：11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Study on Peer Review and Multi-indicators Evaluation in Scientific and Technological Assessment
    Yu Liping
    Pan Yuntao
    Yang chun
    Wu Yishan
    KAM: 2008 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION AND MODELING, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 794 - 798
  • [42] The peer review and the training of the researcher: evaluation of scientific knowledge in the perspective of an intellectual ontogenesis
    Nascimento da Silva, Claudio Nei
    Machado Mueller, Suzana Pinheiro
    BIBLIOS-REVISTA DE BIBLIOTECOLOGIA Y CIENCIAS DE LA INFORMACION, 2019, (76): : 23 - 34
  • [43] Supporting Scientific Writing and Evaluation in a Conceptual Physics Course with Calibrated Peer Review
    Price, Edward
    Goldberg, Fred
    Patterson, Scott
    Heft, Paul
    2012 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2013, 1513 : 318 - 321
  • [44] Relevance and Rigour with Qualitative Entrepreneurship Research: A Literature-Review Based Discussion
    Leick, Birgit
    Tuitjer, Gesine
    ENTREPRENEURSHIP RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2025,
  • [45] Peer review research - Reviewed - Sociological shortcomings of academic evaluation
    Hirschauer, S
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE, 2004, 33 (01): : 62 - 83
  • [46] Peer Review Research Evaluation in Iran: Strengths, Weaknesses and Suggestions
    Eftekhari, Monir-Baradaran
    Ebachfar, Asghar
    Ghalenoee, Elham
    Falahat, Katayoun
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 50 (06) : 1260 - 1265
  • [47] IDA urges ILA to review and clarify key points in dyslexia research advisory
    Annals of Dyslexia, 2016, 66 : 251 - 255
  • [48] IDA urges ILA to review and clarify key points in dyslexia research advisory
    不详
    ANNALS OF DYSLEXIA, 2016, 66 (03) : 251 - 255
  • [49] A retrospective analysis of the effect of discussion in teleconference and face-to-face scientific peer-review panels
    Carpenter, Afton S.
    Sullivan, Joanne H.
    Deshmukh, Arati
    Glisson, Scott R.
    Gallo, Stephen A.
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (09):
  • [50] Ninth international congress on peer review and scientific publication: call for research Help to improve the conduct, reporting, quality, and integrity of scientific research
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Berkwits, Michael
    Flanagin, Annette
    Godlee, Fiona
    Bloom, Theodora
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 366
12345