Key Points of Discussion in Scientific Research Evaluation: Peer Review, Bibliometrics and Relevance

被引：7

作者：

Fernanda Sarthou, Nerina ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Nacl San Martin, Ciencia Polit, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina

[2] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, RA-1033 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina

[3] Univ Nacl Ctr Prov, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina

来源：

REVISTA DE ESTUDIOS SOCIALES | 2016年 / 58期

关键词：

Bibliometrics (Thesaurus); research evaluation; peer review; relevance (Author's keywords); SCIENCE; IMPACT; POLICY; STATE; BIAS;

D O I：

10.7440/res58.2016.06

中图分类号：

D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];

学科分类号：

摘要：

This article seeks to bring together in a single document the set of issues surrounding the definition and implementation of mechanisms and criteria relating to the evaluation of scientific research. It revisits and orders the basic agreements regarding their defects and the proposals for countering them based on a bibliographical review revolving around three questions: who participates in the assessment; how the assessment is carried out; and what is to be evaluated. Finally, it briefly presents some notes referring to the specific literature generated from Latin America, highlighting the limited space dedicated to this topic until now.

引用

页码：76 / 86

页数：11

共 50 条

[31] Quality control of epidemiological lectures online: Scientific evaluation of peer review
Linkov, Faina
Lovalekar, Mita
LaPorte, Ronald
CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 48 (02) : 249 - 255
[32] PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - RELEVANCE FOR RESEARCH IN CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
CICCHETTI, DV
ROURKE, BP
WASS, P
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 14 (06) : 976 - 980
[33] Determinants of peer review engagement and quality in scientific journals: insights for academic research and the sustainability of the peer-review system
Horta, Hugo
Santos, Joao M.
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2024, 49 (09) : 1553 - 1568
[34] Students' experiences of peer learning in an accounting research module: Discussion forums, peer review and group work
Steenkamp, Gretha
Brink, Sophia Magaretha
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, 2024, 22 (03):
[35] Scientific peer review in the humanities: Genre, research, texts: collective. monograph
Dubrovskaya, Svetlana A.
Kirzhaeva, Vera P.
VESTNIK TOMSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA FILOLOGIYA-TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY, 2021, 71 : 327 - 332
[36] Principles of scientific research conduct, peer review, and publication: an editor's perspective
Marian, Ali J.
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR AGING, 2022, 2 (01):
[37] ON REPLACING PEER-REVIEW WITH LEGAL CHALLENGE IN SCIENTIFIC-RESEARCH - AN OPINION
HELD, PJ
PORT, FK
WOLFE, RA
LEVIN, NW
TURENNE, MN
SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS, 1994, 7 (02) : 98 - 102
[38] Polarity of comments and internal consistency in peer review reports on scientific research articles
Astudillo, Cesar
Squadrito, Karem
Varas, German
Gonzalez, Carlos
Sabaj, Omar
ACTA BIOETHICA, 2016, 22 (01): : 119 - 128
[39] Bibliometrics Evaluation of Scientific Journals and Country Research Output of Dental Research in Latin America Using Scimago Journal and Country Rank
Vaccaro, Gustavo
Sanchez-Nunez, Pablo
Witt-Rodriguez, Patricia
PUBLICATIONS, 2022, 10 (03)
[40] Autism behind bars: a review of the research literature and discussion of key issues
Robertson, Caitlin E.
McGillivray, Jane A.
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY & PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 26 (06): : 719 - 736

← 1 2 3 4 5 →