Key Points of Discussion in Scientific Research Evaluation: Peer Review, Bibliometrics and Relevance

被引：7
|
作者：
Fernanda Sarthou, Nerina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Nacl San Martin, Ciencia Polit, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, RA-1033 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Univ Nacl Ctr Prov, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
来源：
REVISTA DE ESTUDIOS SOCIALES | 2016年 / 58期
关键词：
Bibliometrics (Thesaurus); research evaluation; peer review; relevance (Author's keywords); SCIENCE; IMPACT; POLICY; STATE; BIAS;
D O I：
10.7440/res58.2016.06
中图分类号：
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号：
摘要：
This article seeks to bring together in a single document the set of issues surrounding the definition and implementation of mechanisms and criteria relating to the evaluation of scientific research. It revisits and orders the basic agreements regarding their defects and the proposals for countering them based on a bibliographical review revolving around three questions: who participates in the assessment; how the assessment is carried out; and what is to be evaluated. Finally, it briefly presents some notes referring to the specific literature generated from Latin America, highlighting the limited space dedicated to this topic until now.
引用
收藏
页码：76 / 86
页数：11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Peer review: The key to quality and relevance
    Perkins, David
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2009, 17 (05) : 229 - 230
  • [2] Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics
    Giovanni Abramo
    Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo
    Scientometrics, 2011, 87 : 499 - 514
  • [3] Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics
    Abramo, Giovanni
    D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 87 (03) : 499 - 514
  • [4] Limits of bibliometrics indicators in biomedical scientific research evaluation
    Camps, Diego
    COLOMBIA MEDICA, 2008, 39 (01): : 74 - 79
  • [5] Use of bibliometrics for research evaluation in emerging markets economies: a review and discussion of bibliometric indicators
    Al-Jamimi, Hamdi A.
    BinMakhashen, Galal M.
    Bornmann, Lutz
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2022, 127 (10) : 5879 - 5930
  • [6] Use of bibliometrics for research evaluation in emerging markets economies: a review and discussion of bibliometric indicators
    Hamdi A. Al-Jamimi
    Galal M. BinMakhashen
    Lutz Bornmann
    Scientometrics, 2022, 127 : 5879 - 5930
  • [7] Democratising research evaluation: Achieving greater public engagement with bibliometrics-informed peer review
    Derrick, Gemma E.
    Pavone, Vincenzo
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2013, 40 (05) : 563 - 575
  • [8] Peer review: The key to quality in scientific communication
    Hibbard, JL
    Applewhite, LB
    Armbruster, DL
    SOCIETY FOR TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION 44TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 1997 PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 188 - 188
  • [9] Assessment of the relevance of journals in research libraries using bibliometrics (a review)
    Gureev V.N.
    Mazov N.A.
    Sci. Global Secur. Tech. Inf. Process., 1 (30-40): : 30 - 40
  • [10] Scientific Research Problems with peer review
    Henderson, Mark
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 340 : c1409
12345