Research Priorities in the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy Among Diploma Therapists: An International Delphi Study

被引:1
|
作者
Chiba, Hiroki [1 ]
Handa, Yusuke [1 ]
Kikkawa, Kazuki [1 ]
Takasaki, Hiroshi [2 ]
机构
[1] Saitama Prefectural Univ, Hlth & Social Serv, Koshigaya, Japan
[2] Saitama Prefectural Univ, Phys Therapy, Koshigaya, Japan
关键词
mckenzie method; musculoskeletal; research priority; physical therapy; delphi method; LOW-BACK-PAIN; NECK PAIN; EXERCISE; DISABILITY; CONSENSUS; SYSTEM; TRIAL;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.62492
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MDT) is the most researched approach in musculoskeletal physical therapy and involves classifying patients into sub -groups based on their response to loading strategies. MDT diploma therapists (Dip-MDTs) fully recognize the value of MDT in musculoskeletal physical therapy. MDT is updating its system based on the latest research, but the system has not yet been fully established. Therefore, more research is required to increase the comprehensibility of the system. Thus, we aimed to identify future research priorities of MDT. Methods We conducted a modified Delphi study with three rounds. The Research Advisory Committee (RAC) members (n=7) of the McKenzie Institute International were invited to participate in the initial idea generation round. In the subsequent two consensus rounds, Dip-MDTs (n=299) were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the results of the idea generation round using a five -point Likert scale. The criteria for consensus were mean score >4.0, coefficient of variation <= 30%, percent agreement >75%, and quartile deviation <= 1. A post -hoc analysis of the consensus was conducted when the number of participants from a certain country exceeded one-third of the total number of participants. Results The participation rates for each round were 57.1%, 52.2%, and 49.8%. The USA accounted for 43.6% and 44.3% of all participants at the two consensus rounds, respectively. Finally, nine items reached consensus in the second consensus round. After the post -hoc analysis, eight items reached consensus: (1) costeffectiveness, (2) cervical and thoracic spine, (3) extremity classifications, (4) filtered randomized controlled trials (RCTs), (5) spinal source classification, (6) centralization and directional preferences, (7) predictive factors for recurrence, and (8) patient education. Conclusion In this study, we identified the research priorities of MDT that would enhance the completion of the MDT system.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Research priorities in trans health: a Delphi-study
    Jurek, Lucie
    de la Cheneliere, Marie
    Lapoirie, Marion
    Neuville, Paul
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12
  • [42] A Delphi study on metadata: Curriculum implications & research priorities
    Hsieh-Yee, I
    ASIST 2001: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 64TH ASIST ANNUAL MEETING, VOL 38, 2001, 2001, 38 : 646 - 646
  • [43] Occupational health research priorities in Malaysia: a Delphi study
    Sadhra, S
    Beach, JR
    Aw, TC
    Sheikh-Ahmed, K
    OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2001, 58 (07) : 426 - 431
  • [44] Research Priorities in Pediatric Palliative Care: a Delphi Study
    Steele, Rose
    Bosma, Harvey
    Johnston, Meaghen Fletcher
    Cadell, Susan
    Davies, Betty
    Siden, Hal
    Straatman, Lynn
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2008, 24 (04) : 229 - 239
  • [45] Nursing administration research priorities - A national Delphi study
    Lynn, MR
    Layman, EL
    Englebardt, SP
    JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 1998, 28 (05): : 7 - 11
  • [46] To establish nurse research priorities in Spain: Delphi study
    Comet-Cortes, Pilar
    Escobar-Aguilar, Gema
    Gonzalez-Gil, Teresa
    De Ormijana-Saenz Hernandez, Amaia
    Rich-Ruiz, Manuel
    Vidal-Thomas, Clara
    Corcoles-Jimenez, Pilar
    Izquierdo-Mora, Dolores
    Silvestre-Busto, Carmen
    ENFERMERIA CLINICA, 2010, 20 (02): : 88 - 96
  • [47] Priorities in occupational health research: A Delphi study in The Netherlands
    vanderBeek, AJ
    FringsDresen, MHW
    vanDijk, FJH
    Houtman, ILD
    OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1997, 54 (07) : 504 - 510
  • [48] A Delphi study of district nursing research priorities in Australia
    Annells, M
    DeRoche, M
    Koch, T
    Lewin, G
    Lucke, J
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2005, 18 (01) : 36 - 43
  • [49] A Delphi Study to Establish Research Priorities for Neuroscience Nursing
    Bautista, Cynthia
    Hinkle, Janice L.
    Alexander, Sheila
    Hundt, Beth
    Rhudy, Lori
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE NURSING, 2022, 54 (02) : 74 - 79
  • [50] Developing international research priorities for occupational therapy
    Mackenzie, Lynette
    Jaramillo, Liliana Alvarez
    Ledgerd, Ritchard
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2019, 82 (03) : 139 - 140