Research Priorities in the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy Among Diploma Therapists: An International Delphi Study

被引:1
|
作者
Chiba, Hiroki [1 ]
Handa, Yusuke [1 ]
Kikkawa, Kazuki [1 ]
Takasaki, Hiroshi [2 ]
机构
[1] Saitama Prefectural Univ, Hlth & Social Serv, Koshigaya, Japan
[2] Saitama Prefectural Univ, Phys Therapy, Koshigaya, Japan
关键词
mckenzie method; musculoskeletal; research priority; physical therapy; delphi method; LOW-BACK-PAIN; NECK PAIN; EXERCISE; DISABILITY; CONSENSUS; SYSTEM; TRIAL;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.62492
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MDT) is the most researched approach in musculoskeletal physical therapy and involves classifying patients into sub -groups based on their response to loading strategies. MDT diploma therapists (Dip-MDTs) fully recognize the value of MDT in musculoskeletal physical therapy. MDT is updating its system based on the latest research, but the system has not yet been fully established. Therefore, more research is required to increase the comprehensibility of the system. Thus, we aimed to identify future research priorities of MDT. Methods We conducted a modified Delphi study with three rounds. The Research Advisory Committee (RAC) members (n=7) of the McKenzie Institute International were invited to participate in the initial idea generation round. In the subsequent two consensus rounds, Dip-MDTs (n=299) were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the results of the idea generation round using a five -point Likert scale. The criteria for consensus were mean score >4.0, coefficient of variation <= 30%, percent agreement >75%, and quartile deviation <= 1. A post -hoc analysis of the consensus was conducted when the number of participants from a certain country exceeded one-third of the total number of participants. Results The participation rates for each round were 57.1%, 52.2%, and 49.8%. The USA accounted for 43.6% and 44.3% of all participants at the two consensus rounds, respectively. Finally, nine items reached consensus in the second consensus round. After the post -hoc analysis, eight items reached consensus: (1) costeffectiveness, (2) cervical and thoracic spine, (3) extremity classifications, (4) filtered randomized controlled trials (RCTs), (5) spinal source classification, (6) centralization and directional preferences, (7) predictive factors for recurrence, and (8) patient education. Conclusion In this study, we identified the research priorities of MDT that would enhance the completion of the MDT system.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Top 10 International Priorities for Physical Fitness Research and Surveillance Among Children and Adolescents: A Twin-Panel Delphi Study
    Justin J. Lang
    Kai Zhang
    César Agostinis-Sobrinho
    Lars Bo Andersen
    Laura Basterfield
    Daniel Berglind
    Dylan O. Blain
    Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez
    Christine Cameron
    Valerie Carson
    Rachel C. Colley
    Tamás Csányi
    Avery D. Faigenbaum
    Antonio García-Hermoso
    Thayse Natacha Q. F. Gomes
    Aidan Gribbon
    Ian Janssen
    Gregor Jurak
    Mónika Kaj
    Tetsuhiro Kidokoro
    Kirstin N. Lane
    Yang Liu
    Marie Löf
    David R. Lubans
    Costan G. Magnussen
    Taru Manyanga
    Ryan McGrath
    Jorge Mota
    Tim Olds
    Vincent O. Onywera
    Francisco B. Ortega
    Adewale L. Oyeyemi
    Stephanie A. Prince
    Robinson Ramírez-Vélez
    Karen C. Roberts
    Lukáš Rubín
    Jennifer Servais
    Diego Augusto Santos Silva
    Danilo R. Silva
    Jordan J. Smith
    Yi Song
    Gareth Stratton
    Brian W. Timmons
    Grant R. Tomkinson
    Mark S. Tremblay
    Stephen H. S. Wong
    Brooklyn J. Fraser
    Sports Medicine, 2023, 53 : 549 - 564
  • [32] CONSENSUS BUILDING TO IDENTIFY NURSING RESEARCH PRIORITIES AMONG ONCOLOGY NURSES: A DELPHI STUDY
    Hacker, Eileen
    Forbes, Sheryl
    Martinez, Ashley
    Fadol, Anecita
    Vaughn, Jessica
    Dains, Joyce
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2024, 51 (02)
  • [33] Research Priorities for Health Care Chaplaincy in The Netherlands: A Delphi Study Among Dutch Chaplains
    Damen, Annelieke
    Schuhmann, Carmen
    Lensvelt-Mulders, Gerty
    Leget, Carlo
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE CHAPLAINCY, 2020, 26 (03) : 87 - 102
  • [34] International research priorities for integrated care and cross-boundary working: an electronic Delphi study
    Scott, Jason
    Waring, Justin
    Abuosi, Aaron Asibi
    Agada-Amade, Yakubu Adole
    Bashar, Jibril Muhammad
    De Brun, Aoife
    Cann, Henry
    Crowley, Philip
    Dewa, Lindsay H.
    Spanos, Samantha
    Wiig, Siri
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2024, 36 (04)
  • [35] Research Priorities for NCD Prevention and Climate Change: An International Delphi Survey
    Colagiuri, Ruth
    Boylan, Sinead
    Morrice, Emily
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 12 (10): : 12941 - 12957
  • [36] A Delphi study to identify research priorities for the therapies in Ireland
    Kelly, G. P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2011, 74 : 114 - 114
  • [37] Research priorities for parenting and child health: a Delphi study
    Hauck, Yvonne
    Kelly, Robyn Gail
    Fenwick, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2007, 59 (02) : 129 - 139
  • [38] Trends and Priorities of Educational Technology Research: A Delphi Study
    Wang, Xiaoman
    Hampton, John
    Ritzhaupt, Albert D.
    Dawson, Kara
    CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [39] Research priorities in pediatric palliative care: a Delphi study
    Johnston, Meaghen Fletcher
    Bosma, Harvey
    Siden, Hal
    Straatman, Lynn
    Fleming, Carly
    Cadell, Susan
    Davies, Betty
    Steele, Rose
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2007, 23 (03) : 226 - 226
  • [40] Identification of priorities for nursing research in Spain:: a Delphi study
    Moreno-Casbas, T
    Martín-Arribas, C
    Orts-Cortés, I
    Comet-Cortés, P
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2001, 35 (06) : 857 - 863