Multi-Model Machine Learning Approach Accurately Predicts Lake Dissolved Oxygen With Multiple Environmental Inputs

被引:1
|
作者
Lin, Shuqi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pierson, Donald C. [2 ,3 ]
Ladwig, Robert [4 ]
Kraemer, Benjamin M. [5 ]
Hu, Fenjuan R. S. [6 ]
机构
[1] Canada Ctr Inland Waters, Environm & Climate Change Canada, Burlington, ON, Canada
[2] Uppsala Univ, Erken Lab, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Limnol Dept, Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Ctr Limnol, Madison, WI USA
[5] IGB Leibniz Inst Freshwater Ecol & Inland Fisherie, Berlin, Germany
[6] VIA Univ Coll, Res Ctr Bldg Energy Water & Climate, Horsens, Denmark
关键词
LONG-TERM CHANGES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CENTRAL BASIN; NORTH SHORE; HYPOXIA; PHOSPHORUS; DEPLETION; MODEL; VARIABILITY; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1029/2023EA003473
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
As a key water quality parameter, dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, and particularly changes in bottom water DO is fundamental for understanding the biogeochemical processes in lake ecosystems. Based on two machine learning (ML) models, Gradient Boost Regressor (GBR) and long-short-term-memory (LSTM) network, this study developed three ML model approaches: direct GBR; direct LSTM; and a 2-step mixed ML model workflow combining both GBR and LSTM. They were used to simulate multi-year surface and bottom DO concentrations in five lakes. All approaches were trained with readily available environmental data as predictors. Indices of lake thermal structure and mixing provided by a one-dimensional (1-D) hydrodynamic model were also included as predictors in the ML models. The advantages of each ML approach were not consistent for all the tested lakes, but the best one of them was defined that can estimate DO concentration with coefficient of determination (R2) up to 0.6-0.7 in each lake. All three approaches have normalized mean absolute error (NMAE) under 0.15. In a polymictic lake, the 2-step mixed model workflow showed better representation of bottom DO concentrations, with a highest true positive rate (TPR) of hypolimnetic hypoxia detection of over 90%, while the other workflows resulted in, TPRs are around 50%. In most of the tested lakes, the predicted surface DO concentrations and variables indicating stratified conditions (i.e., Wedderburn number and the temperature difference between surface and bottom water) are essential for simulating bottom DO. The ML approaches showed promising results and could be used to support short- and long-term water management plans. Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations is the essential water quality parameter in lake systems. Nowadays, with the development of data-driven machine learning (ML) models, prediction of DO concentrations can be achieved via these models in lakes with long-term DO concentration observations. This study developed three ML model approaches with one mixed two kind of ML models, and test them in five lakes. Readily available environmental data and the derived hydrodynamic data from process-based hydrodynamic model were used as predictors. All three ML approaches showed promising results, and the mixed ML approach show better skill in the lake stratifying and mixing irregularly. To predict hypoxia in the bottom of the lake, the surface DO concentrations and variables indicating water column stratification are important. A 2-step machine learning workflow combining Gradient Boost Regressor and long-short-term-memory was applied to simulate dissolved oxygen A one-dimensional process-based hydrodynamic model provides ML models with indices of lake thermal structure and mixing In a polymictic lake, the 2-step mixed machine learning workflow showed over 90% true positive rate of hypolimnetic hypoxia detection
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multi-model ensemble approach for reservoir dissolved oxygen forecasting based on feature screening and machine learning
    Zhang, Peng
    Liu, Xinyang
    Dai, Huancheng
    Shi, Chengchun
    Xie, Rongrong
    Song, Gangfu
    Tang, Lei
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 166
  • [2] A multi-model approach to analysis of environmental phenomena
    Giustolisi, O.
    Doglioni, A.
    Savic, D. A.
    Webb, B. W.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2007, 22 (05) : 674 - 682
  • [3] Multi-Model Convolution: An Innovative Machine Learning Approach for Sign Language Recognition
    Rathi, Swaraj
    Mehta, Vedant
    MACHINE LEARNING AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2022, 269 : 623 - 637
  • [4] Dynamic flood risk prediction in Houston: a multi-model machine learning approach
    Mishra, Shuchi
    Bajpai, Aproorv
    Mohanta, Agradeep
    Banerjee, Biplab
    Rajput, Shrishti
    Kundu, Sudipta
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 39 (01)
  • [5] A machine learning based model accurately predicts cellular response to electric fields in multiple cell types
    Brett Sargent
    Mohammad Jafari
    Giovanny Marquez
    Abijeet Singh Mehta
    Yao-Hui Sun
    Hsin-ya Yang
    Kan Zhu
    Roslyn Rivkah Isseroff
    Min Zhao
    Marcella Gomez
    Scientific Reports, 12 (1)
  • [6] Reiniforcement learning approach of a multi-model controller
    Al-Akhras, MA
    Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Computational Intelligence, 2005, : 244 - 249
  • [7] A machine learning based model accurately predicts cellular response to electric fields in multiple cell types
    Sargent, Brett
    Jafari, Mohammad
    Marquez, Giovanny
    Mehta, Abijeet Singh
    Sun, Yao-Hui
    Yang, Hsin-ya
    Zhu, Kan
    Isseroff, Roslyn Rivkah
    Zhao, Min
    Gomez, Marcella
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [8] A Machine-Learning Model Accurately Predicts Projected Blood Glucose
    Goldner, Daniel R.
    Osborn, Chandra Y.
    Sears, Lindsay E.
    Huddleston, Brian
    Dachis, Jeff
    DIABETES, 2018, 67
  • [9] A joint multi-model machine learning prediction approach based on confidence for ship stability
    Chaicheng Jiang
    Xianbo Xiang
    Gong Xiang
    Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2024, 10 : 3873 - 3890
  • [10] A joint multi-model machine learning prediction approach based on confidence for ship stability
    Jiang, Chaicheng
    Xiang, Xianbo
    Xiang, Gong
    COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2024, 10 (03) : 3873 - 3890