Integration of Sustainability in Risk Management and Operational Excellence through the VIKOR Method Considering Comparisons between Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods

被引:4
|
作者
Yazo-Cabuya, Eliana Judith [1 ]
Ibeas, Asier [2 ]
Herrera-Cuartas, Jorge Aurelio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bogota Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Fac Ciencias Nat & Ingn, Carrera 4 22-61, Bogota 110311, Colombia
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Telecomunicac & Ingn Sistemas, Barcelona 08193, Spain
关键词
organizational risk management; organizational risks with a focus on sustainability; multi-criteria decision making (MCDM); VI & scaron; ekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR); analytical hierarchy process (AHP); analytical network process (ANP); operational excellence management system (OEMS); PERFORMANCE; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/su16114585
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the current context, organizations face an important challenge in managing risks related to environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. This research presents a general method for prioritizing organizational risks with a focus on sustainability based on the characterization of five typologies of organizational risks and their respective sub-risks, based on an analysis of global reports. Subsequently, paired surveys are administered to a group of experts from various sectors, who assign importance to the organizational sub-risks. Their responses serve as the basis for the prioritization of these risks, using the VI & scaron;ekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) method, which highlights the following most relevant organizational sub-risks for each type of risk: (1) Lack of ethics in the conduct of business (geopolitical risk); (2) Deficit in economic growth (economic risk); (3) Chemical safety (social risk); (4) Massive data fraud or theft incidents (technological risk); and (5) Water depletion (environmental risk). Additionally, a sensitivity analysis is performed to determine the robustness of the results of the VIKOR method and then compare the correlation coefficients with respect to the results obtained in previous studies for the AHP and ANP methods. Finally, we propose the implementation of a model to manage organizational risks, which are addressed proactively through an integral vision, allowing for continuous improvement and alignment with corporate strategy by means of an operational excellence management system (OEMS).
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Bipolar Fuzzy Environment
    M. A. Alghamdi
    Noura Omair Alshehri
    Muhammad Akram
    International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 20 : 2057 - 2064
  • [42] A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for bioenergy systems
    Scott, James A.
    Ho, William
    Dey, Prasanta K.
    ENERGY, 2012, 42 (01) : 146 - 156
  • [43] Stochastic multi-criteria decision-making: an overview to methods and applications
    Celik, Erkan
    Gul, Muhammet
    Yucesan, Melih
    Mete, Suleyman
    BENI-SUEF UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2019, 8 (01)
  • [44] Multi-criteria decision-making applied to the sustainability of building structures based on Modern Methods of Construction
    Sanchez-Garrido, Antonio J.
    Navarro, Ignacio J.
    Yepes, Victor
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 330
  • [45] Stochastic multi-criteria decision-making: an overview to methods and applications
    Erkan Celik
    Muhammet Gul
    Melih Yucesan
    Suleyman Mete
    Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8
  • [46] A Comparison of the Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methods for the Selection of Researchers
    Kaya, Gulsum Kubra
    Ozturk, Fatih
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING IN THE INTERNET-OF-THINGS WORLD, GJCIE 2020, 2022, : 147 - 159
  • [47] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Hodgett, Richard Edgar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 85 (5-8): : 1145 - 1157
  • [48] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Richard Edgar Hodgett
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 85 : 1145 - 1157
  • [49] Vague Set Methods of Multi-criteria Fuzzy Decision-making
    Yan, Ruixia
    Zheng, Jianguo
    Wang, Xiang
    2010 CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 2010, : 658 - 661
  • [50] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Bipolar Fuzzy Environment
    Alghamdi, M. A.
    Alshehri, Noura Omair
    Akram, Muhammad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 20 (06) : 2057 - 2064