Integration of Sustainability in Risk Management and Operational Excellence through the VIKOR Method Considering Comparisons between Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods

被引:4
|
作者
Yazo-Cabuya, Eliana Judith [1 ]
Ibeas, Asier [2 ]
Herrera-Cuartas, Jorge Aurelio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bogota Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Fac Ciencias Nat & Ingn, Carrera 4 22-61, Bogota 110311, Colombia
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Telecomunicac & Ingn Sistemas, Barcelona 08193, Spain
关键词
organizational risk management; organizational risks with a focus on sustainability; multi-criteria decision making (MCDM); VI & scaron; ekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR); analytical hierarchy process (AHP); analytical network process (ANP); operational excellence management system (OEMS); PERFORMANCE; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/su16114585
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the current context, organizations face an important challenge in managing risks related to environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. This research presents a general method for prioritizing organizational risks with a focus on sustainability based on the characterization of five typologies of organizational risks and their respective sub-risks, based on an analysis of global reports. Subsequently, paired surveys are administered to a group of experts from various sectors, who assign importance to the organizational sub-risks. Their responses serve as the basis for the prioritization of these risks, using the VI & scaron;ekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) method, which highlights the following most relevant organizational sub-risks for each type of risk: (1) Lack of ethics in the conduct of business (geopolitical risk); (2) Deficit in economic growth (economic risk); (3) Chemical safety (social risk); (4) Massive data fraud or theft incidents (technological risk); and (5) Water depletion (environmental risk). Additionally, a sensitivity analysis is performed to determine the robustness of the results of the VIKOR method and then compare the correlation coefficients with respect to the results obtained in previous studies for the AHP and ANP methods. Finally, we propose the implementation of a model to manage organizational risks, which are addressed proactively through an integral vision, allowing for continuous improvement and alignment with corporate strategy by means of an operational excellence management system (OEMS).
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A VIKOR-based method for hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making
    Huchang Liao
    Zeshui Xu
    Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2013, 12 : 373 - 392
  • [32] A VIKOR-based method for hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making
    Liao, Huchang
    Xu, Zeshui
    FUZZY OPTIMIZATION AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 12 (04) : 373 - 392
  • [33] Multi-criteria group decision making with fuzzy data: an extension of the VIKOR method
    Jiang, Wenqi
    Shang, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND ELECTRONICS, 2015, 26 (04) : 764 - 773
  • [34] Multi-criteria group decision making with fuzzy data:an extension of the VIKOR method
    Wenqi Jiang
    Jennifer Shang
    JournalofSystemsEngineeringandElectronics, 2015, 26 (04) : 764 - 773
  • [35] Multi-criteria decision-making model for risk management in modular construction projects
    Khodabocus, Sabah
    Seyis, Senem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24 (02) : 240 - 250
  • [36] Agricultural sustainability assessment in Fars province of Iran through the lens of the elimination multi-criteria decision-making method
    Valizadeh, Naser
    Hayati, Dariush
    Karami, Ezatollah
    Rezaei-Moghaddam, Kurosh
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2024, 24
  • [37] Method of dynamic multi-criteria decision-making based on integration of absolute and relative differences
    Dong Qing-xing
    Guo Ya-jun
    He Zhi-yong
    2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTER CONTROL (ICACC 2010), VOL. 1, 2010, : 353 - 356
  • [38] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING FOR SOLVING TRANSPORT SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES: AN OVERVIEW
    Siksnelyte-butkiene, Indre
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Balezentis, Tomas
    Agnusdei, Leonardo
    TRANSPORT, 2024, 39 (03) : 264 - 286
  • [39] A multi-criteria decision-making framework for building sustainability assessment in Kazakhstan
    Akhanova, Gulzhanat
    Nadeem, Abid
    Kim, Jong R.
    Azhar, Salman
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 52
  • [40] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques for Improvement Sustainability Engineering Processes
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Pamucar, Dragan
    Stevic, Zeljko
    Mardani, Abbas
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (06):