Health professionals implicit bias of patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) and its effects on clinical decision-making: a scoping review

被引:2
|
作者
Job, Claire [1 ]
Adenipekun, Bami [1 ]
Cleves, Anne [1 ]
Gill, Paul [2 ]
Samuriwo, Ray [3 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, Wales
[2] Northumbria Univ, Dept Nursing Midwifery & Hlth, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[3] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Edinburgh, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 07期
关键词
Clinical Decision-Making; Health Equity; Stereotyping; Systematic Review; SOCIAL-CLASS BIAS; UNCONSCIOUS RACE; NONMEDICAL INFLUENCES; CARE DISPARITIES; CANCER-TREATMENT; WEAK CRITICISMS; ASSOCIATION; MANAGEMENT; PAIN; CONTRIBUTE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081723
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Research indicates that people with lower socioeconomic status (SES) receive inferior healthcare and experience poorer health outcomes compared with those with higher SES, in part due to health professional (HP) bias. We conducted a scoping review of the impact of HP bias about SES on clinical decision-making and its effect on the care of adults with lower SES.Design JBI scoping review methods were used to perform a systematic comprehensive search for literature. The scoping review protocol has been published in BMJ Open.Data sources Medline, Embase, ASSIA, Scopus and CINAHL were searched, from the first available start date of the individual database to March 2023. Two independent reviewers filtered and screened papers.Eligibility criteria Studies of all designs were included in this review to provide a comprehensive map of the existing evidence of the impact of HP bias of SES on clinical decision-making and its effect on the care for people with lower SES.Data extraction and synthesis Data were gathered using an adapted JBI data extraction tool for systematic scoping reviews.Results Sixty-seven papers were included from 1975 to 2023. 35 (73%) of the included primary research studies reported an association between HP SES bias and decision-making. Thirteen (27%) of the included primary research studies did not find an association between HP SES bias and decision-making. Stereotyping and bias can adversely affect decision-making when the HP is fatigued or has a high cognitive load. There is evidence of intersectionality which can have a powerful cumulative effect on HP assessment and subsequent decision-making. HP implicit bias may be mitigated through the assertiveness of the patient with low SES.Conclusion HP decision-making is at times influenced by non-medical factors for people of low SES, and assumptions are made based on implicit bias and stereotyping, which compound or exacerbate health inequalities. Research that focuses on decision-making when the HP has a high cognitive load, would help the health community to better understand this potential influence.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Shared Decision-Making Tools Implemented in the Electronic Health Record: Scoping Review
    Pierce, Joni H.
    Weir, Charlene
    Taft, Teresa
    Richards Ii, William
    Mcfarland, Mary M.
    Kawamoto, Kensaku
    Del Fiol, Guilherme
    Butler, Jorie M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2025, 27
  • [42] The Use of AI in Mental Health Services to Support Decision-Making: Scoping Review
    Auf, Hassan
    Svedberg, Petra
    Nygren, Jens
    Nair, Monika
    Lundgren, Lina E.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2025, 27
  • [43] Economic evaluations of big data analytics for clinical decision-making: a scoping review
    Bakker, Lytske
    Aarts, Jos
    Uyl-de Groot, Carin
    Redekop, William
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 27 (09) : 1466 - 1475
  • [44] Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status
    Joosten, E. A. G.
    DeFuentes-Merillas, L.
    de Weert, G. H.
    Sensky, T.
    van der Staak, C. P. F.
    de Jong, C. A. J.
    PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2008, 77 (04) : 219 - 226
  • [45] Public and patient involvement in health policy decision-making on the health system level - A scoping review
    Baumann, Lisa Ann
    Reinhold, Anna Katharina
    Bruett, Anna Levke
    HEALTH POLICY, 2022, 126 (10) : 1023 - 1038
  • [46] Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: Update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions
    Legare, France
    Ratte, Stephane
    Gravel, Karine
    Graham, Ian D.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2008, 73 (03) : 526 - 535
  • [47] The effects of socioeconomic status on complex ventral hernia repair operative decision-making and outcomes
    Collins, Courtney M.
    Renshaw, Savannah
    Olson, Molly A.
    Poulose, Benjamin
    Collins, Courtney E.
    SURGERY, 2024, 176 (04) : 1131 - 1137
  • [48] The significance for decision-making of information that is not exchanged by patients and health professionals during consultations
    Bugge, Carol
    Entwistle, Vikki A.
    Watt, Ian S.
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 63 (08) : 2065 - 2078
  • [49] Shared decision-making: A vehicle for participation and individualized clinical care pathways? A Scoping review on patients' and physicians' perceived facilitators and barriers for shared decision-making for frail and elderly patients in the clinical setting
    Vogel, Amyn
    Fuerstenau, Daniel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2022, 22
  • [50] Shared Decision-Making in Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
    Li, Xuejing
    Meng, Meiqi
    Zhao, Junqiang
    Zhang, Xiaoyan
    Yang, Dan
    Fang, Jiaxin
    Wang, Junxin
    Han, Liu
    Hao, Yufang
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2021, 15 : 2763 - 2781