Health professionals implicit bias of patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) and its effects on clinical decision-making: a scoping review

被引:2
|
作者
Job, Claire [1 ]
Adenipekun, Bami [1 ]
Cleves, Anne [1 ]
Gill, Paul [2 ]
Samuriwo, Ray [3 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, Wales
[2] Northumbria Univ, Dept Nursing Midwifery & Hlth, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[3] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Edinburgh, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 07期
关键词
Clinical Decision-Making; Health Equity; Stereotyping; Systematic Review; SOCIAL-CLASS BIAS; UNCONSCIOUS RACE; NONMEDICAL INFLUENCES; CARE DISPARITIES; CANCER-TREATMENT; WEAK CRITICISMS; ASSOCIATION; MANAGEMENT; PAIN; CONTRIBUTE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081723
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Research indicates that people with lower socioeconomic status (SES) receive inferior healthcare and experience poorer health outcomes compared with those with higher SES, in part due to health professional (HP) bias. We conducted a scoping review of the impact of HP bias about SES on clinical decision-making and its effect on the care of adults with lower SES.Design JBI scoping review methods were used to perform a systematic comprehensive search for literature. The scoping review protocol has been published in BMJ Open.Data sources Medline, Embase, ASSIA, Scopus and CINAHL were searched, from the first available start date of the individual database to March 2023. Two independent reviewers filtered and screened papers.Eligibility criteria Studies of all designs were included in this review to provide a comprehensive map of the existing evidence of the impact of HP bias of SES on clinical decision-making and its effect on the care for people with lower SES.Data extraction and synthesis Data were gathered using an adapted JBI data extraction tool for systematic scoping reviews.Results Sixty-seven papers were included from 1975 to 2023. 35 (73%) of the included primary research studies reported an association between HP SES bias and decision-making. Thirteen (27%) of the included primary research studies did not find an association between HP SES bias and decision-making. Stereotyping and bias can adversely affect decision-making when the HP is fatigued or has a high cognitive load. There is evidence of intersectionality which can have a powerful cumulative effect on HP assessment and subsequent decision-making. HP implicit bias may be mitigated through the assertiveness of the patient with low SES.Conclusion HP decision-making is at times influenced by non-medical factors for people of low SES, and assumptions are made based on implicit bias and stereotyping, which compound or exacerbate health inequalities. Research that focuses on decision-making when the HP has a high cognitive load, would help the health community to better understand this potential influence.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using nudges to promote clinical decision making of healthcare professionals: A scoping review
    Wolf, Axel
    Sant'Anna, Anita
    Vilhelmsson, Andreas
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 164
  • [22] Person-Centred Decision-Making in Mental Health: A Scoping Review
    Hormazabal-Salgado, Raul
    Whitehead, Dean
    Osman, Abdi D.
    Hills, Danny
    ISSUES IN MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2024, 45 (03) : 294 - 310
  • [23] Key attributes of health and environmental risk decision-making: A scoping review
    Bhuller, Yadvinder
    Bancroft, Xaand
    Deonandan, Raywat
    Grudniewicz, Agnes
    Wiles, Anne
    Krewski, Daniel
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2025,
  • [24] A scoping review of distributed cognition in acute care clinical decision-making
    Wilson, Eric
    Daniel, Michelle
    Rao, Aditi
    Torre, Dario
    Durning, Steven
    Anderson, Clare
    Goldhaber, Nicole H.
    Townsend, Whitney
    Seifert, Colleen M.
    DIAGNOSIS, 2023, 10 (02) : 68 - 88
  • [25] Conceptualizations of clinical decision-making: a scoping review in geriatric emergency medicine
    Maria Louise Gamborg
    Mimi Mehlsen
    Charlotte Paltved
    Gitte Tramm
    Peter Musaeus
    BMC Emergency Medicine, 20
  • [26] A Systematic Review of the Impact of Physician Implicit Racial Bias on Clinical Decision Making
    Dehon, Erin
    Weiss, Nicole
    Jones, Jonathan
    Faulconer, Whitney
    Hinton, Elizabeth
    Sterling, Sarah
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 24 (08) : 895 - 904
  • [27] Conceptualizations of clinical decision-making: a scoping review in geriatric emergency medicine
    Gamborg, Maria Louise
    Mehlsen, Mimi
    Paltved, Charlotte
    Tramm, Gitte
    Musaeus, Peter
    BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [28] A review of shared decision-making A call to arms for health care professionals
    Bukstein, Don A.
    Guerra, Daniel G. Jr Jr
    Huwe, Ted
    Davis, Ray A.
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 125 (03) : 273 - 279
  • [29] Clinical decision support systems in mental health: A scoping review of health professionals' experiences
    Tong, Fangziyun
    Lederman, Reeva
    D'Alfonso, Simon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2025, 199
  • [30] Shared decision-making with patients with complex care needs: a scoping review
    Perron, M. E.
    Hudon, C.
    Roux-Levy, P. H.
    Poitras, M. E.
    BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2024, 25 (01):