Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocortisone, Ascorbic Acid, and Thiamine Combination Therapy for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

被引:1
|
作者
Deng, Jiawen [1 ,2 ]
Zuo, Qi Kang [3 ]
Venugopal, Kaden [4 ]
Hung, Jay [5 ]
Zubair, Areeba [1 ,2 ]
Blais, Sara [3 ]
Porter, Victoria [3 ]
Moskalyk, Myron [6 ]
Heybati, Kiyan [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, UBC Fac Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Fac Hlth Sci, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Queens Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Kingston, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Biostat Div, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Mayo Clin, Alix Sch Med Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL USA
关键词
Hydrocortisone; Ascorbic acid; Thiamine; Sepsis; Septic shock; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; CRITICAL-CARE TRIALS; FUNNEL-PLOT; VITAMIN-C; MORTALITY; CORTICOSTEROIDS; CONSENSUS; GRADE; GUIDELINES; FAILURE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1159/000538959
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid, and thiamine (HAT) combination therapy in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Methods: We conducted a database search in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CNKI for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HAT against placebo/standard of care or against hydrocortisone in sepsis/septic shock patients. Outcomes included mortality, ICU/hospital length of stay (LOS), vasopressor durations, mechanical ventilation durations, change in SOFA at 72 h, and adverse events. RCT results were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Results: Fifteen RCTs (N = 2,594) were included. At 72 h, HAT reduced SOFA scores from baseline (mean difference [MD] -1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.58 to -0.74, I2 = 0%) compared to placebo/SoC, based on moderate quality of evidence. HAT also reduced the duration of vasopressor use (MD -18.80 h, 95% CI: -23.67 to -13.93, I2 = 64%) compared to placebo/SoC, based on moderate quality of evidence. HAT increased hospital LOS (MD 2.05 days, 95% CI: 0.15-3.95, I2 = 57%) compared to placebo/SoC, based on very low quality of evidence. HAT did not increase incidence of adverse events compared to placebo/SoC. Conclusions: HAT appears beneficial in reducing vasopressor use and improving organ function in sepsis/septic shock patients. However, its advantages over hydrocortisone alone remain unclear. Future research should use hydrocortisone comparators and distinguish between sepsis-specific and comorbidity- or care-withdrawal-related mortality.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The efficacy of randomised controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy for perfectionism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Galloway, Ricky
    Watson, Hunna
    Greene, Danyelle
    Shafran, Roz
    Egan, Sarah J.
    COGNITIVE BEHAVIOUR THERAPY, 2022, 51 (02) : 170 - 184
  • [42] Safety and Efficacy of Corticosteroids for the Treatment of Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sligl, Wendy I.
    Milner, Danny A., Jr.
    Sundar, Sugantha
    Mphatswe, Wendy
    Majumdar, Sumit R.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2009, 49 (01) : 93 - 101
  • [43] Prognosis of β-adrenergic blockade therapy on septic shock and sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Li, Ji'an
    Sun, Wanli
    Guo, Yuqi
    Ren, Yunxia
    Li, Yangjun
    Yang, Zhenhua
    CYTOKINE, 2020, 126
  • [44] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF COMBINATION OF THREE OR MORE BP LOWERING DRUGS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Mohammad, Abdul Salam
    Atkins, Emily
    Hsu, Benjumin
    Webster, Ruth
    Rodgers, Anthony
    Patel, Anushka
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2016, 34 : E442 - E442
  • [45] Blood Purification and Mortality in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
    Putzu, Alessandro
    Schorer, Raoul
    Carlos Lopez-Delgado, Juan
    Cassina, Tiziano
    Landoni, Giovanni
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 131 (03) : 580 - 593
  • [46] Comparative efficacy of Chinese tonic medicines for treating sepsis or septic shock: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Yang, Rui
    Hu, Cheng
    Zhuo, Yuxin
    Tan, Qingyuan
    Shen, Yuxin
    Jiang, Kun
    Xia, Qing
    Deng, Lihui
    PHYTOMEDICINE, 2025, 136
  • [47] Safety and efficacy of tirofiban in the management of stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Al-Salihi, Mohammed Maan
    Ayyad, Ali
    Al-Jebur, Maryam Sabah
    Al-Salihi, Yezan
    Saha, Ram
    Morsi, Rami Z.
    Kass-Hout, Tareq
    Al Kasab, Sami
    Spiotta, Alejandro M.
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 232
  • [48] The efficacy and safety of menatetrenone in the management of osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Su, S.
    He, N.
    Men, P.
    Song, C.
    Zhai, S.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 30 (06) : 1175 - 1186
  • [49] The efficacy and safety of menatetrenone in the management of osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    S. Su
    N. He
    P. Men
    C. Song
    S. Zhai
    Osteoporosis International, 2019, 30 : 1175 - 1186
  • [50] Efficacy and Safety of Oral Herbal Drugs Used as Adjunctive Therapy for Melasma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
    Tang, Qingti
    Yang, Hongjie
    Liu, Xiarong
    Zou, Yu
    Lv, Xintong
    Chen, Kai
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 2021