Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocortisone, Ascorbic Acid, and Thiamine Combination Therapy for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

被引:1
|
作者
Deng, Jiawen [1 ,2 ]
Zuo, Qi Kang [3 ]
Venugopal, Kaden [4 ]
Hung, Jay [5 ]
Zubair, Areeba [1 ,2 ]
Blais, Sara [3 ]
Porter, Victoria [3 ]
Moskalyk, Myron [6 ]
Heybati, Kiyan [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, UBC Fac Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Fac Hlth Sci, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Queens Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Kingston, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Biostat Div, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Mayo Clin, Alix Sch Med Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL USA
关键词
Hydrocortisone; Ascorbic acid; Thiamine; Sepsis; Septic shock; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; CRITICAL-CARE TRIALS; FUNNEL-PLOT; VITAMIN-C; MORTALITY; CORTICOSTEROIDS; CONSENSUS; GRADE; GUIDELINES; FAILURE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1159/000538959
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid, and thiamine (HAT) combination therapy in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Methods: We conducted a database search in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CNKI for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HAT against placebo/standard of care or against hydrocortisone in sepsis/septic shock patients. Outcomes included mortality, ICU/hospital length of stay (LOS), vasopressor durations, mechanical ventilation durations, change in SOFA at 72 h, and adverse events. RCT results were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Results: Fifteen RCTs (N = 2,594) were included. At 72 h, HAT reduced SOFA scores from baseline (mean difference [MD] -1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.58 to -0.74, I2 = 0%) compared to placebo/SoC, based on moderate quality of evidence. HAT also reduced the duration of vasopressor use (MD -18.80 h, 95% CI: -23.67 to -13.93, I2 = 64%) compared to placebo/SoC, based on moderate quality of evidence. HAT increased hospital LOS (MD 2.05 days, 95% CI: 0.15-3.95, I2 = 57%) compared to placebo/SoC, based on very low quality of evidence. HAT did not increase incidence of adverse events compared to placebo/SoC. Conclusions: HAT appears beneficial in reducing vasopressor use and improving organ function in sepsis/septic shock patients. However, its advantages over hydrocortisone alone remain unclear. Future research should use hydrocortisone comparators and distinguish between sepsis-specific and comorbidity- or care-withdrawal-related mortality.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy and safety of aminoglycoside monotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Vidal, L.
    Gafter-Gvili, A.
    Borok, S.
    Fraser, A.
    Leibovici, L.
    Paul, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2007, 29 : S29 - S30
  • [32] Hydrocortisone with fludrocortisone for septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yamamoto, Ryo
    Nahara, Isao
    Toyosaki, Mitsunobu
    Fukuda, Tatsuma
    Masuda, Yoshiki
    Fujishima, Seitaro
    ACUTE MEDICINE & SURGERY, 2020, 7 (01):
  • [33] Intravenous thiamine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Qian, Xiangfeng
    Zhang, Zhe
    Li, Feng
    Wu, Longchuan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (12): : 2718 - 2722
  • [34] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF FLUDROCORTISONE PLUS HYDROCORTISONE VS HYDROCORTISONE ALONE OR PLACEBO IN PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Navalha, Denilsa
    Aljazeeri, Jafar
    Roberson, Manuel Villegas
    Pareja-Plata, Jose
    Guillen, Camilo
    Advani, Kavita
    CHEST, 2024, 166 (04) : 2337A - 2337A
  • [35] Efficacy and safety of Chinese tonic medicines for treating sepsis or septic shock: a protocol for a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Yang, Rui
    Hu, Cheng
    Zhuo, Yuxin
    Wang, Wen
    Tan, Qingyuan
    Shen, Yuxin
    Jiang, Kun
    Sun, Xin
    Xia, Qing
    Deng, Lihui
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [36] Efficacy and safety of local fibrinolytic therapy in intracranial hemorrhages: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Rajeswaran, Arun Babu
    Ali, Arshad
    Safi, Saleh
    Saleh, Ahmed Eid Abdulghani
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY-X, 2024, 22
  • [37] Effectiveness of Fludrocortisone Plus Hydrocortisone versus Hydrocortisone Alone in Septic Shock A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Teja, Bijan
    Berube, Megan
    Pereira, Tiago V.
    Law, Anica C.
    Schanock, Carly
    Pang, Brandon
    Wunsch, Hannah
    Walkey, Allan J.
    Bosch, Nicholas A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 209 (10) : 1219 - 1228
  • [38] Safety and efficacy of tetrastarches in surgery and trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Chappell, Daniel
    Linden, Philippe van der
    Ripolles-Melchor, Javier
    James, Michael F. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 127 (04) : 556 - 568
  • [39] COMBINATION THERAPY AS INITIAL TREATMENT FOR HYPERTENSION: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Salam, Mohammad Abdul
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2018, 36 : E148 - E148
  • [40] Effect of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone combination on mortality in septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Jheng-Yen
    Liu, Mei-Yuan
    Liu, Ting-Hui
    Huang, Po-Yu
    Restinia, Mita
    Hsu, Wan-Hsuan
    Tsai, Ya-Wen
    Chuang, Min-Hsiang
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    Lai, Chih-Cheng
    INFECTION, 2024, : 553 - 560