Being a happy farmer: Technology adoption and subjective well-being

被引:2
|
作者
Liu, Yan [1 ]
Chen, Minjie [2 ]
Yu, Jianyu [3 ]
Wang, Xiaobing [4 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Univ, Business Coll, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Res Inst Econ & Management, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, China Ctr Agr Policy, Sch Adv Agr Sci, Yiheyuan Rd 5, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家社会科学基金;
关键词
Farmers; Subjective well-being; Agricultural mechanization services; AGRICULTURAL MECHANIZATION SERVICES; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD-ESTIMATION; INCOME COMPARISONS; IMPACT; TIME; HAPPINESS; LEISURE; CHINA; PRODUCTIVITY; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2024.03.028
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper empirically investigates the impact of technology adoption on farmers' subjective well-being, as measured by happiness and life satisfaction. A theoretical framework is constructed to link farmers' subjective well-being to technology adoption, with a particular emphasis on mechanization services in agricultural production. By fitting a nationally representative panel dataset - China Family Panel Studies - into an endogenous switching regression model that addresses potential selection bias, we find that technology adoption leads to a 0.194 standard deviation increase in happiness and a 0.065 standard deviation increase in life satisfaction. Further analysis reveals that the effect is more pronounced for individuals engaged in off-farm employment and varies across farm sizes. To underpin the causal effect, we test three plausible mechanisms - absolute income, relative income, and leisure - which are well-documented in the literature for their correlations with happiness and life satisfaction. Our empirical analysis indicates that the adoption of agricultural mechanization services indeed increases the absolute income of farmers and allows them to allocate more time to leisure activities.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 405
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dimensions of Subjective Well-Being
    Kapteyn, Arie
    Lee, Jinkook
    Tassot, Caroline
    Vonkova, Hana
    Zamarro, Gema
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2015, 123 (03) : 625 - 660
  • [42] Pleasures and subjective well-being
    Oishi, S
    Schimmack, U
    Diener, E
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2001, 15 (02) : 153 - 167
  • [43] AGE AND SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING
    Hansen, T.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2010, 50 : 190 - 190
  • [44] Weekends and Subjective Well-Being
    John F. Helliwell
    Shun Wang
    Social Indicators Research, 2014, 116 : 389 - 407
  • [45] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AND AGE
    HORLEY, J
    LAVERY, JJ
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1995, 34 (02) : 275 - 282
  • [46] Culture and subjective well-being
    Mio, JS
    CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY-APA REVIEW OF BOOKS, 2003, 48 (02): : 195 - 197
  • [47] SUBJECTIVE MEASURES OF WELL-BEING
    CAMPBELL, A
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1976, 31 (02) : 117 - 124
  • [48] The science of subjective well-being
    Adu-Gyamfi, Samuel
    AFRICAN REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE-AREF, 2015, 7 (01): : 124 - 126
  • [49] In defence of subjective well-being
    Dolan, Paul
    HEALTH ECONOMICS POLICY AND LAW, 2008, 3 (01) : 93 - 95
  • [50] The anatomy of subjective well-being
    van Praag, BMS
    Frijters, P
    Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2003, 51 (01) : 29 - 49