Being a happy farmer: Technology adoption and subjective well-being

被引:2
|
作者
Liu, Yan [1 ]
Chen, Minjie [2 ]
Yu, Jianyu [3 ]
Wang, Xiaobing [4 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Univ, Business Coll, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Res Inst Econ & Management, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, China Ctr Agr Policy, Sch Adv Agr Sci, Yiheyuan Rd 5, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家社会科学基金;
关键词
Farmers; Subjective well-being; Agricultural mechanization services; AGRICULTURAL MECHANIZATION SERVICES; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD-ESTIMATION; INCOME COMPARISONS; IMPACT; TIME; HAPPINESS; LEISURE; CHINA; PRODUCTIVITY; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2024.03.028
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper empirically investigates the impact of technology adoption on farmers' subjective well-being, as measured by happiness and life satisfaction. A theoretical framework is constructed to link farmers' subjective well-being to technology adoption, with a particular emphasis on mechanization services in agricultural production. By fitting a nationally representative panel dataset - China Family Panel Studies - into an endogenous switching regression model that addresses potential selection bias, we find that technology adoption leads to a 0.194 standard deviation increase in happiness and a 0.065 standard deviation increase in life satisfaction. Further analysis reveals that the effect is more pronounced for individuals engaged in off-farm employment and varies across farm sizes. To underpin the causal effect, we test three plausible mechanisms - absolute income, relative income, and leisure - which are well-documented in the literature for their correlations with happiness and life satisfaction. Our empirical analysis indicates that the adoption of agricultural mechanization services indeed increases the absolute income of farmers and allows them to allocate more time to leisure activities.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 405
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Innovativeness and Subjective Well-Being
    Martin Binder
    Social Indicators Research, 2013, 111 : 561 - 578
  • [32] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AND EVENTS
    Yu, Nanyi Nicole
    Mair, Judith
    Lee, Andy
    Ong, Faith
    EVENT MANAGEMENT, 2022, 26 (01): : 7 - 24
  • [33] Effects of organic farming adoption on farmer's subjective well-being: evidence from Xiangxi Prefecture, China
    Xiang, Pingan
    Wen, Chi
    Lin, Zhifen
    Xia, Maosen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 23 (01)
  • [34] Subjective positive well-being
    Bech, Per
    WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 11 (02) : 105 - 106
  • [35] Culture and subjective well-being
    Brinkman, R
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2002, 36 (03) : 830 - 833
  • [36] Measuring Subjective Well-Being
    Layard, Richard
    SCIENCE, 2010, 327 (5965) : 534 - 535
  • [37] Retirement and subjective well-being
    Bonsang, Eric
    Klein, Tobias J.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2012, 83 (03) : 311 - 329
  • [38] Subjective Well-Being of Orphans
    Dahlan, Tina Hayati
    Wyandini, Diah Zaleha
    Hasanah, Viena Rusmiati
    ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2019, 25 (01) : 216 - 220
  • [39] Economy and Subjective Well-Being
    You, Meiqin
    Miao, Yuanjiang
    Zhu, Xiaohong
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING (ESME 2011), VOLS 1-5, 2011, : 2675 - 2679
  • [40] Psychopathy and subjective well-being
    Love, Ashley B.
    Holder, Mark D.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 66 : 112 - 117