HOW WE FOUND CONSENSUS ON PEDIATRIC DECISION-MAKING AND WHY IT MATTERS

被引:0
|
作者
Salter, Erica K. [1 ,5 ]
Ross, Lainie Friedman [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hester, Micah [2 ]
机构
[1] St Louis Univ, Gnaegi Ctr Hlth Care Ethics, Hlth Care Ethics & Pediat, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas Med Sci UAMS, Coll Med, Dept Med Humanities & Bioeth, Little Rock, AR USA
[3] Univ Arkansas Med Sci UAMS, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Little Rock, AR USA
[4] Arkansas Childrens Hosp, Little Rock, AR USA
[5] St Louis Univ, Salus Ctr, 3545 Lafayette Ave,Room 481, St Louis, MO 63104 USA
关键词
INTEREST STANDARD; MEDICAL DECISIONS; HARM PRINCIPLE; INTERESTS; THRESHOLD; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1353/pbm.2024.a929017
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
This article describes the process engaged by 17 expert scholars in the development of a set of six consensus recommendations about the normative foundations of pediatric decision -making. The process began with a robust pre -reading assignment, followed by three days of in -person symposium discussions that resulted in a publication in Pediatrics entitled "Pediatric Decision -Making: Consensus Recommendations" (Salter et al. 2023). This article next compares the six recommendations to existing statements about pediatric decision -making (specifically those developed by the American Academy of Pediatrics), highlighting similarities and differences. Finally, the article discusses the value of finding consensus in the field of pediatric bioethics.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 196
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Computational modelling for decision-making: where, why, what, who and how
    Calder, Muffy
    Craig, Claire
    Culley, Dave
    de Cani, Richard
    Donnelly, Christl A.
    Douglas, Rowan
    Edmonds, Bruce
    Gascoigne, Jonathon
    Gilbert, Nigel
    Hargrove, Caroline
    Hinds, Derwen
    Lane, David C.
    Mitchell, Dervilla
    Pavey, Giles
    Robertson, David
    Rosewell, Bridget
    Sherwin, Spencer
    Walport, Mark
    Wilson, Alan
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2018, 5 (06):
  • [32] How Do We Teach Reading as a Strategic, Decision-Making Process?
    Ellery, Valerie
    READING TEACHER, 2010, 63 (05): : 434 - 436
  • [33] Why we should talk about option generation in decision-making research
    Kalis, Annemarie
    Kaiser, Stefan
    Mojzisch, Andreas
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
  • [34] A novel approach for No Fault Found decision-making
    Khan, Samir
    Farnsworth, Michael
    Erkoyuncu, John
    CIRP JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 17 : 18 - 31
  • [35] How We Misunderstand Economics and Why it Matters
    Bischoff, Ivo
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 78 : 181 - 182
  • [36] How We Use Stories and Why That Matters
    不详
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2022, 37 (05) : 581 - 581
  • [37] PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN DECISION-MAKING IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
    Ofak, Lana
    CROATIAN AND COMPARATIVE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2009, 9 (02): : 443 - 470
  • [38] Why it Matters How We Frame the Environment
    Lakoff, George
    ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE, 2010, 4 (01): : 70 - 81
  • [39] How to move forward in shared decision-making in pediatric palliative care
    Joren, Chantal Y.
    Aris-Meijer, Judith L.
    Verhagen, A. A. Eduard
    Lantos, John
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT HEALTH CARE, 2024, 54 (01)
  • [40] How We See Area and Why It Matters
    Yousif, Sami R.
    Keil, Frank C.
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (07) : 554 - 557