Why we should talk about option generation in decision-making research

被引:21
|
作者
Kalis, Annemarie [1 ]
Kaiser, Stefan [2 ]
Mojzisch, Andreas [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Philosophy, NL-3512 BL Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Zurich Univ Hosp Psychiat, Dept Psychiat Psychotherapy & Psychosomat, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Hildesheim, Inst Psychol, D-31141 Hildesheim, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2013年 / 4卷
关键词
decision-making; option generation; option; goal; plan; action representation; AGENCY; SENSE; WILL;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00555
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Most empirical studies on decision-making start from a set of given options for action. However, in everyday life there is usually no one asking you to choose between A, B, and C. Recently, the question how people come up with options has been receiving growing attention. However, so far there has been neither a systematic attempt to define the construct of "option" nor an attempt to show why decision-making research really needs this construct. This paper aims to fill that void by developing definitions of "option" and "option generation" that can be used as a basis for decision-making research in a wide variety of decision-making settings, while clarifying how these notions relate to familiar psychological constructs. We conclude our analysis by arguing that there are indeed reasons to believe that option generation is an important and distinct aspect of human decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Option generation in decision-making research: why just talk?
    Kolodny, Oren
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
  • [2] Why should we talk about it
    Wulf, Hinnerk
    ANASTHESIOLOGIE INTENSIVMEDIZIN NOTFALLMEDIZIN SCHMERZTHERAPIE, 2010, 45 (10): : 638 - 639
  • [3] Why do we need for timeliness of research in decision-making?
    de Jong, Judith
    Hansen, J.
    Groenewegen, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 29
  • [4] Why and how we should talk about pedagogical tact
    Krinninger, Dominik
    Mueller, Hans-Ruediger
    ETHICS AND EDUCATION, 2024, 19 (03) : 262 - 274
  • [5] Why do we argue about risk? The invisibility of worldviews in marine decision-making
    Le Heron, Erena
    Le Heron, Richard
    Blackett, Paula
    Awatere, Shaun
    Logie, June
    Hyslop, Jade
    ELEMENTA-SCIENCE OF THE ANTHROPOCENE, 2024, 12 (01):
  • [6] We Should Talk About This
    Donix, Markus
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 172 (07): : 614 - 615
  • [7] Deliberative perfectionism: Why we can and should talk about the good
    Bonotti, Matteo
    PHILOSOPHY & SOCIAL CRITICISM, 2015, 41 (07) : 637 - 653
  • [8] What we (should) talk about when we talk about fruitfulness
    Silvia Ivani
    European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2019, 9
  • [9] What we (should) talk about when we talk about fruitfulness
    Ivani, Silvia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2019, 9 (01)
  • [10] SHOULD WE HAVE CHILDREN - A DECISION-MAKING GROUP FOR COUPLES
    KIMBALL, KK
    MCCABE, ME
    PERSONNEL AND GUIDANCE JOURNAL, 1981, 60 (03): : 153 - 156