Why we should talk about option generation in decision-making research

被引:21
|
作者
Kalis, Annemarie [1 ]
Kaiser, Stefan [2 ]
Mojzisch, Andreas [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Philosophy, NL-3512 BL Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Zurich Univ Hosp Psychiat, Dept Psychiat Psychotherapy & Psychosomat, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Hildesheim, Inst Psychol, D-31141 Hildesheim, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2013年 / 4卷
关键词
decision-making; option generation; option; goal; plan; action representation; AGENCY; SENSE; WILL;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00555
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Most empirical studies on decision-making start from a set of given options for action. However, in everyday life there is usually no one asking you to choose between A, B, and C. Recently, the question how people come up with options has been receiving growing attention. However, so far there has been neither a systematic attempt to define the construct of "option" nor an attempt to show why decision-making research really needs this construct. This paper aims to fill that void by developing definitions of "option" and "option generation" that can be used as a basis for decision-making research in a wide variety of decision-making settings, while clarifying how these notions relate to familiar psychological constructs. We conclude our analysis by arguing that there are indeed reasons to believe that option generation is an important and distinct aspect of human decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Why we should talk about institutional (dis)trustworthiness and medical machine learning
    De Proost, Michiel
    Pozzi, Giorgia
    MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2025, 28 (01) : 83 - 92
  • [22] The World to the Boards Why we should talk about the Audiences even beyond the Crises
    Bergmann, Holger
    THEATER HEUTE, 2023, (02): : 71 - 71
  • [23] HOW WE FOUND CONSENSUS ON PEDIATRIC DECISION-MAKING AND WHY IT MATTERS
    Salter, Erica K.
    Ross, Lainie Friedman
    Hester, Micah
    PERSPECTIVES IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2024, 67 (02) : 186 - 196
  • [24] WHO SHOULD DECIDE - SURVEY OF ATTITUDES ABOUT BIOETHICAL DECISION-MAKING
    HOLMES, C
    MARGETTS, J
    GIBBS, G
    ETHICS IN SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1979, 6 (03): : 137 - 144
  • [25] What we feel and why we buy: the influence of emotions on consumer decision-making
    Achar, Chethana
    So, Jane
    Agrawal, Nidhi
    Duhachek, Adam
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 10 : 166 - 170
  • [26] Why research methods matter: Essential skills for decision-making
    Myers, Samuel L., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AND NONPROFIT AFFAIRS, 2019, 5 (03): : 338 - 340
  • [27] Why research methods matter: Essential skills for decision-making
    Rubaii, Nadia
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS EDUCATION, 2019, 25 (02) : 277 - 279
  • [28] A Systematic Review of CBM Content in Practitioner-Focused Journals: Do We Talk About Instructional Decision-Making?
    Fry, Erica C.
    Toste, Jessica R.
    Feuer, Beth R.
    Espin, Christine A.
    JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2023,
  • [29] What we talk about when we talk about ebonics: Why definitions matter
    Lippi-Green, R
    BLACK SCHOLAR, 1997, 27 (02): : 7 - 11
  • [30] To talk better about vaccines, we should talk less about vaccines
    Gesualdo, Francesco
    Zamperini, Nicola
    Tozzi, Alberto E.
    VACCINE, 2018, 36 (34) : 5107 - 5108