Patient, caregiver and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives: a scoping review protocol

被引：1

作者：

Munce, Sarah E. P. ^{[1
,2
]}

Wong, Elliott ^{[3
,4
]}

Luong, Dorothy ^{[1
]}

Rao, Justin ^{[3
]}

Cunningham, Jessie ^{[5
]}

Bailey, Katherine ^{[3
,6
]}

John, Tomisin ^{[4
]}

Barber, Claire ^{[7
]}

Batthish, Michelle ^{[8
]}

Chambers, Kyle ^{[9
]}

Cleverley, Kristin ^{[10
,11
]}

Crabtree, Marilyn ^{[9
,12
]}

Diaz, Sanober ^{[9
,12
]}

Dimitropoulos, Gina ^{[9
,13
]}

Gorter, Jan Willem ^{[14
,15
]}

Grahovac, Danijela ^{[16
,17
]}

Grimes, Ruth ^{[18
]}

Guttman, Beverly ^{[12
]}

Hebert, Michele L. ^{[19
]}

Henze, Megan ^{[9
,20
]}

Higgins, Amanda ^{[9
,21
]}

Khodyakov, Dmitry ^{[22
]}

Li, Elaine ^{[9
]}

Lo, Lisha ^{[23
]}

Macgregor, Laura ^{[9
,24
]}

Mooney, Sarah ^{[9
,25
]}

Severino, Samadhi Mora ^{[9
,26
]}

Mukerji, Geetha ^{[27
]}

Penner, Melanie ^{[9
,28
]}

Pidduck, Jacklynn ^{[9
,21
]}

Shulman, Rayzel ^{[3
,29
,30
]}

Stromquist, Lisa ^{[9
,31
]}

Trbovich, Patricia ^{[6
,32
]}

Wan, Michelle ^{[9
]}

Williams, Laura ^{[9
,33
]}

Yates, Darryl ^{[4
,9
]}

Toulany, Alene ^{[3
,34
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Hlth Network, KITE Toronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada

[2] Univ Toronto, Rehabil Sci Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada

[3] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada

[4] Hosp Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada

[5] Hosp Sick Children, Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada

[6] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada

[7] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Med, Calgary, AB, Canada

[8] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada

[9] Integrated Knowledge Translat Panel Member, Toronto, ON, Canada

[10] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth Queen St Site, Toronto, ON, Canada

[11] Univ Toronto, Lawrence Bloomberg Fac Nursing, Toronto, ON, Canada

[12] Prov Council Maternal & Child Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada

[13] Univ Calgary, Fac Social Work, Calgary, AB, Canada

[14] McMaster Univ, CanChild Ctr Childhood Disabil Res, Dept Pediat, Hamilton, ON, Canada

[15] Univ Med Ctr, Wilhelmina Childrens Hosp, Dept Rehabil Phys Therapy Sci & Sports, Utrecht, Netherlands

[16] Childrens Healthcare Canada, Natl Hlth Hub Transit, Hamilton, ON, Canada

[17] McMaster Univ, CanChild Ctr Childhood Disabil Res, Hamilton, ON, Canada

[18] Canadian Pediat Soc, Winnipeg, MB, Canada

[19] Univ Alberta, Fac Rehabil Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada

[20] Surrey Pl Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada

[21] IWK Hlth Ctr, Halifax, NS, Canada

[22] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA

[23] Univ Toronto, Ctr Qual Improvement & Patient Safety, Toronto, ON, Canada

[24] Martin Luther Univ Coll, Waterloo, ON, Canada

[25] Stollery Childrens Hosp, Edmonton, AB, Canada

[26] York Univ, Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Toronto, ON, Canada

[27] Womens Coll Hosp, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada

[28] Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabil Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada

[29] Univ Toronto, Div Endocrinol, Toronto, ON, Canada

[30] Univ Toronto, Dept Paediat, Toronto, ON, Canada

[31] Natl Hlth Hub Transit, Childrens Healthcare Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada

[32] North York Gen Hosp, Patient Safety & Qual Improvement, Toronto, ON, Canada

[33] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

[34] Hosp Sick Children, Div Adolescent Med, Toronto, ON, Canada

来源：

BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 05期

关键词：

patients; patient participation; literature; NOMINAL GROUP; DELPHI METHOD; PARTICIPATION; CORE;

D O I：

10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080822

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

Introduction Patient engagement and integrated knowledge translation (iKT) processes improve health outcomes and care experiences through meaningful partnerships in consensus-building initiatives and research. Consensus-building is essential for engaging a diverse group of experienced knowledge users in co-developing and supporting a solution where none readily exists or is less optimal. Patients and caregivers provide invaluable insights for building consensus in decision-making around healthcare, policy and research. However, despite emerging evidence, patient engagement remains sparse within consensus-building initiatives. Specifically, our research has identified a lack of opportunity for youth living with chronic health conditions and their caregivers to participate in developing consensus on indicators/benchmarks for transition into adult care. To bridge this gap and inform our consensus-building approach with youth/caregivers, this scoping review will synthesise the extent of the literature on patient and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives.Methods and analysis Following the scoping review methodology from Joanna Briggs Institute, published literature will be searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases from inception to July 2023. Grey literature will be hand-searched. Two independent reviewers will determine the eligibility of articles in a two-stage process, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Included studies must be consensus-building studies within the healthcare context that involve patient engagement strategies. Data from eligible studies will be extracted and charted on a standardised form. Abstracted data will be analysed quantitatively and descriptively, according to specific consensus methodologies, and patient engagement models and/or strategies.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review protocol. The review process and findings will be shared with and informed by relevant knowledge users. Dissemination of findings will also include peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. The results will offer new insights for supporting patient engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives.Protocol registration https://osf.io/beqjr

引用

页数：7

共 50 条

[41] Structured approaches to promote patient and family engagement in treatment in acute care hospital settings: protocol for a systematic scoping review
Goodridge, Donna
Henry, Chrysanthus
Watson, Erin
McDonald, Meghan
New, Lucia
Harrison, Elizabeth L.
Scharf, Murray
Penz, Erika
Campbell, Steve
Rotter, Thomas
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
[42] Management of Fracture Risk in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Building a UK Consensus Through Healthcare Professional and Patient Engagement
Gupta, Ayushman
Jayes, Leah R.
Holmes, Steve
Sahota, Opinder
Canavan, Melissa
Elkin, Sarah L.
Lim, Kelvin
Murphy, Anna C.
Singh, Sally
Towlson, Elizabeth A.
Ward, Helen
Scullion, Jane
McKeever, Tricia M.
Bolton, Charlotte E.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2020, 15 : 1377 - 1390
[43] Benefits of Patient/Caregiver Engagement in Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Compared With Other Sources of Reporting in the Inpatient Setting: A Systematic Review
Prakasam, Dhanuvarshini
Wong, Adrian L.
Smithburger, Pamela L.
Buckley, Mitchell S.
Kane-Gill, Sandra L.
JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2021, 17 (08) : E765 - E772
[44] How current law and policy supports providers of NHS healthcare in England to respond to patient harm: A scoping review protocol
Assame, Naomi
Greenhalgh, Susan
Tingle, John
Wright, Julie
Yeowell, Gillian
PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (03):
[45] Using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approach in trainee-led research: a scoping review protocol
Cassidy, Christine E.
Beck, Amy Jane
Conway, Aislinn
Demery Varin, Melissa
Laur, Celia
Lewis, Krystina B.
Ramage, Emily R.
Nguyen, Tram
Steinwender, Sandy
Ormel, Ilja
Stratton, Lillian
Shin, Hwayeon Danielle
BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (05):
[46] Patient-public engagement interventions for health system improvement in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic scoping review protocol
Ankomah, Samuel Egyakwa
Fusheini, Adam
Ballard, Christy
Kumah, Emmanuel
Gurung, Gagan
Derrett, Sarah
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 36 (02): : 273 - 281
[47] Mapping knowledge, attitudes and perceptions regarding antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance among healthcare providers in Africa: a scoping review protocol
Sarele, Tebello Violet
Thamae, Palesa Juliet
Ojewole, Elizabeth Bolanle
BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (03):
[48] Patient engagement, treatment preferences and shared decision-making in the treatment of opioid use disorder in adults: a scoping review protocol
Marshall, Tyler
Kinnard, Elizabeth N.
Hancock, Myles
King-Jones, Susanne
Olson, Karin
Abba-Aji, Adam
Rittenbach, Katherine
Vohra, Sunita
BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (10):
[49] Capacity-building and continuing professional development in healthcare and rehabilitation in low- and middle-income countries—a scoping review protocol
Dalton Deprez
Angela J. Busch
Paola Andrea Ramirez
Eliany Pedrozo Araque
Julia Bidonde
Systematic Reviews, 12
[50] Impact of Telemedicine Use by Oncology Physicians on the Patient and Informal Caregiver Experience of Receiving Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review in the Context of COVID-19
Thiessen, Maclean
Soriano, Andrea Michelle
Loewen, Hal John
Decker, Kathleen Margaret
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2020, 9 (12):

← 1 2 3 4 5 →