Patient, caregiver and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives: a scoping review protocol

被引：1

作者：

Munce, Sarah E. P. ^{[1
,2
]}

Wong, Elliott ^{[3
,4
]}

Luong, Dorothy ^{[1
]}

Rao, Justin ^{[3
]}

Cunningham, Jessie ^{[5
]}

Bailey, Katherine ^{[3
,6
]}

John, Tomisin ^{[4
]}

Barber, Claire ^{[7
]}

Batthish, Michelle ^{[8
]}

Chambers, Kyle ^{[9
]}

Cleverley, Kristin ^{[10
,11
]}

Crabtree, Marilyn ^{[9
,12
]}

Diaz, Sanober ^{[9
,12
]}

Dimitropoulos, Gina ^{[9
,13
]}

Gorter, Jan Willem ^{[14
,15
]}

Grahovac, Danijela ^{[16
,17
]}

Grimes, Ruth ^{[18
]}

Guttman, Beverly ^{[12
]}

Hebert, Michele L. ^{[19
]}

Henze, Megan ^{[9
,20
]}

Higgins, Amanda ^{[9
,21
]}

Khodyakov, Dmitry ^{[22
]}

Li, Elaine ^{[9
]}

Lo, Lisha ^{[23
]}

Macgregor, Laura ^{[9
,24
]}

Mooney, Sarah ^{[9
,25
]}

Severino, Samadhi Mora ^{[9
,26
]}

Mukerji, Geetha ^{[27
]}

Penner, Melanie ^{[9
,28
]}

Pidduck, Jacklynn ^{[9
,21
]}

Shulman, Rayzel ^{[3
,29
,30
]}

Stromquist, Lisa ^{[9
,31
]}

Trbovich, Patricia ^{[6
,32
]}

Wan, Michelle ^{[9
]}

Williams, Laura ^{[9
,33
]}

Yates, Darryl ^{[4
,9
]}

Toulany, Alene ^{[3
,34
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Hlth Network, KITE Toronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada

[2] Univ Toronto, Rehabil Sci Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada

[3] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada

[4] Hosp Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada

[5] Hosp Sick Children, Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada

[6] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada

[7] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Med, Calgary, AB, Canada

[8] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada

[9] Integrated Knowledge Translat Panel Member, Toronto, ON, Canada

[10] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth Queen St Site, Toronto, ON, Canada

[11] Univ Toronto, Lawrence Bloomberg Fac Nursing, Toronto, ON, Canada

[12] Prov Council Maternal & Child Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada

[13] Univ Calgary, Fac Social Work, Calgary, AB, Canada

[14] McMaster Univ, CanChild Ctr Childhood Disabil Res, Dept Pediat, Hamilton, ON, Canada

[15] Univ Med Ctr, Wilhelmina Childrens Hosp, Dept Rehabil Phys Therapy Sci & Sports, Utrecht, Netherlands

[16] Childrens Healthcare Canada, Natl Hlth Hub Transit, Hamilton, ON, Canada

[17] McMaster Univ, CanChild Ctr Childhood Disabil Res, Hamilton, ON, Canada

[18] Canadian Pediat Soc, Winnipeg, MB, Canada

[19] Univ Alberta, Fac Rehabil Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada

[20] Surrey Pl Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada

[21] IWK Hlth Ctr, Halifax, NS, Canada

[22] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA

[23] Univ Toronto, Ctr Qual Improvement & Patient Safety, Toronto, ON, Canada

[24] Martin Luther Univ Coll, Waterloo, ON, Canada

[25] Stollery Childrens Hosp, Edmonton, AB, Canada

[26] York Univ, Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Toronto, ON, Canada

[27] Womens Coll Hosp, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada

[28] Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabil Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada

[29] Univ Toronto, Div Endocrinol, Toronto, ON, Canada

[30] Univ Toronto, Dept Paediat, Toronto, ON, Canada

[31] Natl Hlth Hub Transit, Childrens Healthcare Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada

[32] North York Gen Hosp, Patient Safety & Qual Improvement, Toronto, ON, Canada

[33] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

[34] Hosp Sick Children, Div Adolescent Med, Toronto, ON, Canada

来源：

BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 05期

关键词：

patients; patient participation; literature; NOMINAL GROUP; DELPHI METHOD; PARTICIPATION; CORE;

D O I：

10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080822

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

Introduction Patient engagement and integrated knowledge translation (iKT) processes improve health outcomes and care experiences through meaningful partnerships in consensus-building initiatives and research. Consensus-building is essential for engaging a diverse group of experienced knowledge users in co-developing and supporting a solution where none readily exists or is less optimal. Patients and caregivers provide invaluable insights for building consensus in decision-making around healthcare, policy and research. However, despite emerging evidence, patient engagement remains sparse within consensus-building initiatives. Specifically, our research has identified a lack of opportunity for youth living with chronic health conditions and their caregivers to participate in developing consensus on indicators/benchmarks for transition into adult care. To bridge this gap and inform our consensus-building approach with youth/caregivers, this scoping review will synthesise the extent of the literature on patient and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives.Methods and analysis Following the scoping review methodology from Joanna Briggs Institute, published literature will be searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases from inception to July 2023. Grey literature will be hand-searched. Two independent reviewers will determine the eligibility of articles in a two-stage process, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Included studies must be consensus-building studies within the healthcare context that involve patient engagement strategies. Data from eligible studies will be extracted and charted on a standardised form. Abstracted data will be analysed quantitatively and descriptively, according to specific consensus methodologies, and patient engagement models and/or strategies.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review protocol. The review process and findings will be shared with and informed by relevant knowledge users. Dissemination of findings will also include peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. The results will offer new insights for supporting patient engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives.Protocol registration https://osf.io/beqjr

引用

页数：7

共 50 条

[21] Using Patient and Family Engagement Strategies to Improve Outcomes of Health Information Technology Initiatives: Scoping Review
Leung, Kevin
Lu-Mclean, Drew
Kuziemsky, Craig
Booth, Richard G.
Rossetti, Sarah Collins
Borycki, Elizabeth
Strudwick, Gillian
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (10)
[22] User engagement with technology-mediated self-guided interventions for addictions: scoping review protocol
Brazeau, Brad W.
Hodgins, David C.
BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (08):
[23] Reflective and reflexive practices in tertiary healthcare students following cancer patient engagement: A scoping review
Johnstone, Daniel
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 20 : 177 - 178
[24] Instruments for assessing healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding deprescribing: a scoping review protocol
Modesto, Ana Carolina Figueiredo
Lopes, Luis Phillipe Nagem
Pantuzza, Lais Lessa Neiva
Moura, Mariana Del Grossi
de Oliveira, Jardel Correa
Lopes, Luciane Cruz
BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (01):
[25] User interface approaches implemented with automated patient deterioration surveillance tools: protocol for a scoping review
Wan, Yik-Ki Jacob
Del Fiol, Guilherme
McFarland, Mary M.
Wright, Melanie C.
BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (01):
[26] Strategies and impacts of patient and family engagement in collaborative mental healthcare: protocol for a systematic and realist review
Menear, Matthew
Gervais, Michel
Careau, Emmanuelle
Chouinard, Maud-Christine
Cloutier, Guylaine
Delorme, Andre
Dogba, Maman Joyce
Dugas, Michele
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
Gilbert, Michel
Harvey, Diane
Houle, Janie
Kates, Nick
Knowles, Sara
Martin, Neasa
Nease, Donald, Jr.
Pluye, Pierre
Samson, Esther
Zomahoun, Herve Tchala Vignon
Legare, France
BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (09):
[27] The use of theories, frameworks, or models in knowledge translation studies in healthcare settings in China: a scoping review protocol
Zhao, Junqiang
Li, Xuejing
Yan, Lijiao
Yu, Yamei
Hu, Jiale
Li, Shelly-Anne
Chen, Wenjun
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
[28] Patient, Public, and Healthcare Professionals' Sepsis Awareness, Knowledge, and Information Seeking Behaviors: A Scoping Review
Fiest, Kirsten M.
Krewulak, Karla D.
Brundin-Mather, Rebecca
Leia, Madison P.
Fox-Robichaud, Alison
Lamontagne, Francois
Leigh, Jeanna Parsons
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (08) : 1187 - 1197
[29] The use of theories, frameworks, or models in knowledge translation studies in healthcare settings in China: a scoping review protocol
Junqiang Zhao
Xuejing Li
Lijiao Yan
Yamei Yu
Jiale Hu
Shelly-Anne Li
Wenjun Chen
Systematic Reviews, 10
[30] Benefits and limitations of business process model notation in modelling patient healthcare trajectory: a scoping review protocol
Kassim, Said Abasse
Gartner, Jean-Baptiste
Labbe, Laurence
Landa, Paolo
Paquet, Catherine
Bergeron, Frederic
Lemaire, Celia
Cote, Andre
BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05):

← 1 2 3 4 5 →