Assessing the influence of research and development, environmental policies, and green technology on ecological footprint for achieving environmental sustainability

被引:18
|
作者
Nketiah, Emmanuel [1 ]
Song, Huaming [1 ,3 ]
Adjei, Mavis [1 ]
Obuobi, Bright [2 ]
Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Green technology; Industrialization environmental policies; Environmental sustainability; Research & development; RENEWABLE ENERGY; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; ASYMMETRIC IMPACT; EMISSIONS; CONSUMPTION; NEXUS; INDUSTRIALIZATION; AGRICULTURE; INNOVATIONS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2024.114508
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Recently, there has been rising global concern regarding the importance of achieving environmental sustainability. Consequently, researchers and policymakers have focused on identifying and evaluating the various elements that contribute to an individual 's ecological footprint and environmental consequences. Therefore, this study provides an in-depth understanding of the roles of green technology, research and development (R &D), and environmental policies that help attain environmental sustainability in Ghana. The present study utilized both the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) and autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) techniques to evaluate the long and short -run relationships between explanatory variables from 1990 to 2022. The study compares the results of NARDL and ARDL techniques. The findings reveal that the NARDL (0.999) analysis had a greater impact on the ecological footprint in Ghana than the ARDL (0.996) analysis. Under the ARDL technique, green technology has a negative impact on ECF in both the short and long run, and R &D also decreases ecological footprint (ECF) in the long run. Environmental policies had a negative impact on ECF in both the short and long run. Based on the NARDL approach, an adverse change in GT had a negative impact (0.004) on the ECF in both the short and long run. In contrast, a negative change in R &D has a negative impact (0.007) on the ECF in the short run, and a positive change in R &D negatively affects the ecological footprint in the long run. Notably, a positive change in environmental policies had a significant negative impact (0.040) on the ECF in the short and long run. This study suggests that policymakers should encourage and support the adoption and application of green technology and the development of robust environmental policies, as these measures can significantly contribute to decreasing the ecological footprint and fostering environmental sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does economic complexity matter for environmental sustainability? Using ecological footprint as an indicator
    Rafique, Muhammad Zahid
    Nadeem, Abdul Majeed
    Xia, Wanjun
    Ikram, Majid
    Shoaib, Hafiz Muhammad
    Shahzad, Umer
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (04) : 4623 - 4640
  • [42] Does economic complexity matter for environmental sustainability? Using ecological footprint as an indicator
    Muhammad Zahid Rafique
    Abdul Majeed Nadeem
    Wanjun Xia
    Majid Ikram
    Hafiz Muhammad Shoaib
    Umer Shahzad
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2022, 24 : 4623 - 4640
  • [43] An environmental measure of Japan's economic development: The ecological footprint
    Parker, P
    GEOGRAPHISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 1998, 86 (02) : 106 - 119
  • [44] Seeing green: achieving environmental sustainability through Lean and Six Sigma
    Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo
    Kumar, Vikas
    Chen, F. Frank
    Wang, Yi-Chi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2017, 8 (01) : 2 - 6
  • [45] Editorial: Green innovation and industrial ecosystem reconstruction in achieving environmental sustainability
    Sun, Huaping
    Fang, Kai
    Shi, Yongjiang
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [46] Assessing the environmental sustainability corridor: Linking natural resources, renewable energy, human capital, and ecological footprint in BRICS.
    Nathaniel, Solomon Prince
    Yalciner, Kursat
    Bekun, Festus Victor
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 70
  • [47] ACHIEVING LEADERSHIP IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT
    CHATTERJI, D
    RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1995, 38 (02) : 37 - 42
  • [48] The mediating role of green energy and environmental policies in sustainable development for BRICS economies: A tripartite impact of entrepreneurial activities, urban development and economic growth on ecological footprint
    Udemba, Edmund Ntom
    Shah, Syed Ale Raza
    Philip, Lucy Davou
    Zhao, Guangyuan
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 32 (05) : 4649 - 4670
  • [49] Green technology, green electricity, and environmental sustainability in Western European countries
    Oyebanji, Modupe Oluyemisi
    Kirikkaleli, Dervis
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (13) : 38525 - 38534
  • [50] Assessing subsidy policies for green products: operational and environmental perspectives
    Zhang, Linghong
    Xue, Bowen
    Li, Kevin W.
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (05) : 3081 - 3106