Assessing the influence of research and development, environmental policies, and green technology on ecological footprint for achieving environmental sustainability

被引:18
|
作者
Nketiah, Emmanuel [1 ]
Song, Huaming [1 ,3 ]
Adjei, Mavis [1 ]
Obuobi, Bright [2 ]
Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Green technology; Industrialization environmental policies; Environmental sustainability; Research & development; RENEWABLE ENERGY; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; ASYMMETRIC IMPACT; EMISSIONS; CONSUMPTION; NEXUS; INDUSTRIALIZATION; AGRICULTURE; INNOVATIONS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2024.114508
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Recently, there has been rising global concern regarding the importance of achieving environmental sustainability. Consequently, researchers and policymakers have focused on identifying and evaluating the various elements that contribute to an individual 's ecological footprint and environmental consequences. Therefore, this study provides an in-depth understanding of the roles of green technology, research and development (R &D), and environmental policies that help attain environmental sustainability in Ghana. The present study utilized both the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) and autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) techniques to evaluate the long and short -run relationships between explanatory variables from 1990 to 2022. The study compares the results of NARDL and ARDL techniques. The findings reveal that the NARDL (0.999) analysis had a greater impact on the ecological footprint in Ghana than the ARDL (0.996) analysis. Under the ARDL technique, green technology has a negative impact on ECF in both the short and long run, and R &D also decreases ecological footprint (ECF) in the long run. Environmental policies had a negative impact on ECF in both the short and long run. Based on the NARDL approach, an adverse change in GT had a negative impact (0.004) on the ECF in both the short and long run. In contrast, a negative change in R &D has a negative impact (0.007) on the ECF in the short run, and a positive change in R &D negatively affects the ecological footprint in the long run. Notably, a positive change in environmental policies had a significant negative impact (0.040) on the ECF in the short and long run. This study suggests that policymakers should encourage and support the adoption and application of green technology and the development of robust environmental policies, as these measures can significantly contribute to decreasing the ecological footprint and fostering environmental sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Harnessing the synergistic impacts of environmental innovations, financial development, green growth, and ecological footprint through the lens of SDGs policies for countries exhibiting high ecological footprints
    Saqib, Najia
    Usman, Muhammad
    Ozturk, Ilhan
    Sharif, Arshian
    ENERGY POLICY, 2024, 184
  • [32] Research on environmental green development technology by sustainable utilisation of green sports buildings
    Wang, Xi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 23 (2-4) : 162 - 171
  • [33] The nexus between environmental regulations, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: linking environmental patents to ecological footprint reduction in South Asia
    Murshed, Muntasir
    Rahman, Md Aminur
    Alam, Md Shabbir
    Ahmad, Paiman
    Dagar, Vishal
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (36) : 49967 - 49988
  • [34] The nexus between environmental regulations, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: linking environmental patents to ecological footprint reduction in South Asia
    Muntasir Murshed
    Md. Aminur Rahman
    Md Shabbir Alam
    Paiman Ahmad
    Vishal Dagar
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 49967 - 49988
  • [35] Promotion of Green Technology under Different Environmental Policies
    Strandholm, John C.
    GAMES, 2020, 11 (03): : 1 - 23
  • [36] Measuring sustainability: Why the ecological footprint is bad economics and bad environmental science
    Fiala, Nathan
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 67 (04) : 519 - 525
  • [37] Role of renewable energy and globalization on ecological footprint in the USA: implications for environmental sustainability
    Ojonugwa Usman
    Seyi Saint Akadiri
    Ibrahim Adeshola
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 30681 - 30693
  • [38] Role of renewable energy and globalization on ecological footprint in the USA: implications for environmental sustainability
    Usman, Ojonugwa
    Akadiri, Seyi Saint
    Adeshola, Ibrahim
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (24) : 30681 - 30693
  • [39] The Sustainability evaluation of county ecosystem based on ecological footprint and environmental friendship index
    Zhao Dingtao
    Huang Xibing
    Li Haidong
    Wei, Qi
    GLOBALIZATION CHALLENGE AND MANAGEMENT TRANSFORMATION, VOLS I - III, 2007, : 1755 - 1761
  • [40] Assessment and prediction of environmental sustainability in China based on a modified ecological footprint model
    Wang, Zhaohua
    Yang, Lin
    Yin, Jianhua
    Zhang, Bin
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 132 : 301 - 313