Assessing the influence of research and development, environmental policies, and green technology on ecological footprint for achieving environmental sustainability

被引:18
|
作者
Nketiah, Emmanuel [1 ]
Song, Huaming [1 ,3 ]
Adjei, Mavis [1 ]
Obuobi, Bright [2 ]
Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Green technology; Industrialization environmental policies; Environmental sustainability; Research & development; RENEWABLE ENERGY; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; ASYMMETRIC IMPACT; EMISSIONS; CONSUMPTION; NEXUS; INDUSTRIALIZATION; AGRICULTURE; INNOVATIONS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2024.114508
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Recently, there has been rising global concern regarding the importance of achieving environmental sustainability. Consequently, researchers and policymakers have focused on identifying and evaluating the various elements that contribute to an individual 's ecological footprint and environmental consequences. Therefore, this study provides an in-depth understanding of the roles of green technology, research and development (R &D), and environmental policies that help attain environmental sustainability in Ghana. The present study utilized both the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) and autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) techniques to evaluate the long and short -run relationships between explanatory variables from 1990 to 2022. The study compares the results of NARDL and ARDL techniques. The findings reveal that the NARDL (0.999) analysis had a greater impact on the ecological footprint in Ghana than the ARDL (0.996) analysis. Under the ARDL technique, green technology has a negative impact on ECF in both the short and long run, and R &D also decreases ecological footprint (ECF) in the long run. Environmental policies had a negative impact on ECF in both the short and long run. Based on the NARDL approach, an adverse change in GT had a negative impact (0.004) on the ECF in both the short and long run. In contrast, a negative change in R &D has a negative impact (0.007) on the ECF in the short run, and a positive change in R &D negatively affects the ecological footprint in the long run. Notably, a positive change in environmental policies had a significant negative impact (0.040) on the ECF in the short and long run. This study suggests that policymakers should encourage and support the adoption and application of green technology and the development of robust environmental policies, as these measures can significantly contribute to decreasing the ecological footprint and fostering environmental sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental Sustainability in India: The Effects of Financial Development and Green Energy on Ecological Footprint
    Ozbek, Bahar
    Ozbek, Sefa
    ACTA MONTANISTICA SLOVACA, 2024, 29 (01) : 203 - 215
  • [2] Assessing environmental sustainability of particleboard production process by ecological footprint
    Saravia-Cortez, A. M.
    Herva, M.
    Garcia-Dieguez, C.
    Roca, E.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 52 : 301 - 308
  • [3] Achieving environmental sustainability through information technology: "Digital Pakistan" initiative for green development
    Nizam, Hassan Ahmad
    Zaman, Khalid
    Khan, Khan Burhan
    Batool, Rubeena
    Khurshid, Muhammad Adnan
    Shoukry, Alaa Mohamed
    Sharkawy, Mohamed A.
    Aldeek, Fares
    Khader, Jameel
    Gani, Showkat Hussain
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (09) : 10011 - 10026
  • [4] Achieving environmental sustainability through information technology: “Digital Pakistan” initiative for green development
    Hassan Ahmad Nizam
    Khalid Zaman
    Khan Burhan Khan
    Rubeena Batool
    Muhammad Adnan Khurshid
    Alaa Mohamd Shoukry
    Mohamed A. Sharkawy
    Fares Aldeek
    Jameel Khader
    Showkat Gani
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 10011 - 10026
  • [5] Environmental Sustainability: The Ecological Footprint in West Africa
    Marquart-Pyatt, Sandra T.
    HUMAN ECOLOGY REVIEW, 2015, 22 (01) : 73 - 92
  • [6] Environmental sustainability in Turkey: an environmental Kuznets curve estimation for ecological footprint
    Bulut, Umit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03): : 227 - 237
  • [7] The Heterogeneous Effect of Energy Transition, Environmental Policies and Green Financial Policies on Ecological Footprint: An OECD Perspective
    Dao, Ngoc Bich
    Truong, Huong Hoang Diep
    Shahbaz, Muhammad
    Chu, Lan Khanh
    Hoang, Dung Phuong
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (05) : 953 - 969
  • [8] Capitalism and ecological sustainability: the shaping of environmental policies
    Vlachou, A
    REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2004, 11 (05) : 926 - 952
  • [9] Research on environmental green technology under the development of green building
    Jing, Xiaolei
    Wu, Pei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 23 (2-4) : 172 - 184
  • [10] Towards achieving environmental sustainability: environmental quality versus economic growth in a developing economy on ecological footprint via dynamic simulations of ARDL
    Solarin, Sakiru Adebola
    Nathaniel, Solomon P.
    Bekun, Festus Victor
    Okunola, Akinbode Michael
    Alhassan, Abdulkareem
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (14) : 17942 - 17959