Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guided focal cryoablation for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Sidana, Abhinav [1 ,2 ]
Tayebi, Shima [3 ]
Blank, Fernando [1 ]
Lama, Daniel J. [1 ]
Meyer, Meredith [1 ]
Saeed, Yusef [1 ]
Tobler, Juliana [3 ]
Hsu, Wei-Wen [4 ]
Verma, Sadhna [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Surg, Sect Urol, Med & Biol Sci, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Cincinnati, OH USA
[4] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Div Biostat & Bioinformat, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
Prostate cancer; Focal therapy; Cryoablation; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion; Outcomes; Failure; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Focal therapy (FT) is a form of ablative treatment offered to men with localized, organ-confined prostate cancer (CaP). Pelvic multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and mpMRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion (MRI-US) guidance enable the precise delivery of FT with limited ablation of adjacent benign tissue or vital genitourinary structures. This article presents our findings on using MRI-US to perform FT as a primary treatment for men with intermediate-risk CaP. Methods: Thirty-six men underwent MRI-US fusion-guided FT cryoablation at a single center from 2018 to 2023 as a primary treatment for intermediate-risk CaP. Following FT, quarterly prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and a 6 to 9 month mpMRI and combined MRIUS targeted and systematic biopsy were performed. Oncological outcomes were determined using several endpoints containing biochemical recurrence, imaging failure, and pathological failure. Functional outcomes were measured using reported erectile dysfunction/potency rates, urinary incontinence rates, and the American Urologic Association Symptom Score (AUA-SS) and Sexual Health Inventory for Men Results: Median follow-up was 29.1 months, most (75%) of whom had grade group 2 CaP. Out of the 36 men, 32 (88.9%) completed the combined MRI-targeted and systematic biopsy follow-up after treatment. The study had no major complications, but 12 (33.3%) patients experienced Clavien-Dindo grade II or lower complications. For oncological outcomes, 6 (16.7%) men had biochemical recurrence, 9 (25%) showed imaging failure, and 8 (22.2%) met the criteria for positive biopsy- out-of-field vs. in-field. 88.2% of previously potent patients remained potent postoperatively at 12 months. All patients were continent at 12 months. There were no statistically significant changes in the AUA-SS and SHIM scores postoperatively. Conclusion: MRI-US-guided cryoablation to target lesions in intermediate-risk CaP appears to be a safe treatment option, with functional outcomes indicating minimal short and intermediate-term morbidity and acceptable oncological outcomes. However, despite close monitoring and follow-up, there is still a limitation in accurately predicting/detecting pathological failure after FT. The long-term durability of FT for intermediate-risk, organ-confined CaP remains uncertain. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:158e1 / 158e10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OFFICE BASED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-ULTRASOUND FUSION GUIDED FOCAL CRYOTHERAPY OF PROSTATE CANCER
    Patel, Neal A.
    Hu, Jim C.
    Bianco, Fernando
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E1240 - E1240
  • [2] Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer: Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion for Guidance
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Jones, Tonye A.
    Priester, Alan M.
    Geoghegan, Rory
    Lieu, Patricia
    Delfin, Merdie
    Felker, Ely
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Sisk, Anthony
    Pantuck, Allan
    Grundfest, Warren
    Marks, Leonard S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (04): : 839 - 846
  • [3] Target detection: Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy
    Sonn, Geoffrey A.
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 32 (06) : 903 - 911
  • [4] Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer: Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion for Guidance EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Ghai, Sangeet
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (04): : 846 - 846
  • [5] MAGNETIC RESONANCE / ULTRASOUND FUSION-GUIDED CRYOABLATION OF THE PROSTATE
    Wang, Robert
    Davenport, Matthew
    Curci, Nicole
    Shankar, Prasad
    Miller, David
    George, Arvin
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E849 - E849
  • [6] Prostate cancer risk stratification using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion vs systematic prostate biopsy
    Khajir, Ghazal
    Press, Benjamin
    Lokeshwar, Soum
    Ghabili, Kamyar
    Rahman, Syed
    Gardezi, Mursal
    Washington, Samuel
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Sprenkle, Preston
    Leapman, Michael S.
    JNCI CANCER SPECTRUM, 2023, 7 (06)
  • [7] COMPARING THE CANCER DETECTION RATE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-ULTRASOUND FUSION GUIDED VERSUS COGNITIVE-MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY FOR SMALL PROSTATE LESIONS
    Mare, Anton
    Bergersen, Phil
    Chalasani, Venu
    Goolam, Ahmed
    Dias, Max
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E310 - E310
  • [8] INCREASED PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION WITH MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-ULTRASOUND FUSION BIOPSY IN MEN REQUIRING REPEAT BIOPSY
    Narayanan, Ramkishen
    Chevli, K. Kent
    Cipolla, David
    Geary, William
    Suraf, Margaret
    Duff, Michael
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E1080 - E1080
  • [9] Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy - a new era of prostate cancer diagnosis
    Lai, T. C. T.
    Ma, W. K.
    Lam, A. K. C.
    Lam, A. C. S.
    Tsang, C. F.
    Lam, W.
    Ho, B. S. H.
    Ng, A. T. L.
    Tsu, J. H. L.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 123 : 6 - 6
  • [10] USING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING TO DEFINE FOCAL THERAPY TEMPLATES IN PATIENTS WITH INTERMEDIATE-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Pieretti, Alberto
    Kang, Hyunseon
    Choi, Haesun
    Zhang, Miao
    Chapin, Brian
    Ward, John
    Troncoso, Patricia
    Gregg, Justin
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E937 - E937